
| QUESTION from:Eboni, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 10/6/1999: | |
| Dear Answerman: I am a new member and the only one in my family. I want to go on a mission one day and grow stronger in my faith. I need to be with a Mormon family in a Mormon community. Can you tell me how I can be an au pair or work for board and pocketchange in Salt Lake or Provo? Do you have any other suggestions? | |
I can't tell you about who might
be looking for that kind of
arrangement, but I can tell you
how you can grow strong in the
faith. Read the Book of Mormon
and the Bible, and stay with the
people you live and when thou are
converted, strengthen thy
brethren. (Luke 22:32)
Strengthen your family, work with
them.The gathering of Israel, of which you are a part, is taking place throughout the world, and it is important that people strengthen the stakes in which they live: D&C 115:6 And that the gathering together upon the land of Zion, and upon her stakes, may be for a defense, and for a refuge from the storm, and from wrath when it shall be poured out without mixture upon the whole earth. The stakes will help protect us when the wrath is poured out upon the earth by God. The so-called "tribulation." The prophet Ezra Taft Benson taught:
We will live in the midst of
economic, political, and spiritual
instability. When these signs are
observed-unmistakable evidences
that His coming is nigh-we need
not be troubled, but "stand in
holy places, and be not moved,
until the day of the Lord come"
(D&C 87:8). Holy men and women
stand in holy places, and these
holy places consist of our
temples, our chapels, our homes,
and stakes of Zion, which are, as
the Lord declares, "for a defense,
and for a refuge from the storm,
and from wrath when it shall be
poured out without mixture upon
the whole earth" (D&C 115:6). We
must heed the Lord's counsel to
the Saints of this dispensation:
"Prepare yourselves for the great
day of the Lord" (D&C 133:10).
Members of stakes are to be
models or standards of
righteousness. Stakes are to be a
defense (see D&C 115:6). They do
this as they unify under their
local priesthood officers and
dedicate themselves to do their
duty and keep their covenants.
Those covenants, if kept, become a
protection from error, evil, or
calamity. (El Paso Texas Regional
Conference, 25 January 1986.)
If you want to go on a mission, pray for it. The resurrected Christ taught the Nephites: 3 Nephi 18:20 And whatsoever ye shall ask the Father in my name, which is right, believing that ye shall receive, behold it shall be given unto you. |
| QUESTION from:Juan Perdo, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 10/7/1999: | |
| Where in the book of Mormon does it say that there is only one God My friend asked me this and I was unable to tell him. | |
2 Nephi 31:20 Wherefore, ye must
press forward with a steadfastness
in Christ, having a perfect
brightness of hope, and a love of
God and of all men. Wherefore, if
ye shall press forward, feasting
upon the word of Christ, and
endure to the end, behold, thus
saith the Father: Ye shall have
eternal life.21 And now, behold, my beloved brethren, this is the way; and there is none other way nor name given under heaven whereby man can be saved in the kingdom of God. And now, behold, this is the doctrine of Christ, and the only and true doctrine of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, which is one God, without end. Amen. Mosiah 15:1 AND now Abinadi said unto them: I would that ye should understand that God himself shall come down among the children of men, and shall redeem his people. 2 And because he dwelleth in flesh he shall be called the Son of God, and having subjected the flesh to the will of the Father, being the Father and the Son-- 3 The Father, because he was conceived by the power of God; and the Son, because of the flesh; thus becoming the Father and Son-- 4 And they are one God, yea, the very Eternal Father of heaven and of earth. 5 And thus the flesh becoming subject to the Spirit, or the Son to the Father, being one God, suffereth temptation, and yieldeth not to the temptation, but suffereth himself to be mocked, and scourged, and cast out, and disowned by his people. 6 And after all this, after working many mighty miracles among the children of men, he shall be led, yea, even as Isaiah said, as a sheep before the shearer is dumb, so he opened not his mouth. 7 Yea, even so he shall be led, crucified, and slain, the flesh becoming subject even unto death, the will of the Son being swallowed up in the will of the Father. 8 And thus God breaketh the bands of death, having gained the victory over death; giving the Son power to make intercession for the children of men-- 9 Having ascended into heaven, having the bowels of mercy; being filled with compassion towards the children of men; standing betwixt them and justice; having broken the bands of death, taken upon himself their iniquity and their transgressions, having redeemed them, and satisfied the demands of justice. |
| QUESTION from:Joshua James Taylor, Baptist Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 10/7/1999: | |
| when Jesus died on the cross did he die for all my sins or did he do an incomplete job | |
It all depends on you. Jesus did
not atone for the sins of the
unrepentant. So the question can
be answered by one's self as to
how complete and sincere has been
their repentance throughout their
life.
Alma 5:27
27 Have ye walked, keeping
yourselves blameless before God?
Could ye say, if ye were called to
die at this time, within
yourselves, that ye have been
sufficiently humble? That your
garments have been cleansed and
made white through the blood of
Christ, who will come to redeem
his people from their sins?
What this Book of Mormon prophet teaches us is that the Lord will redeem his people _from_ their sins, and not while in their sins. Speaking to the people on another occasion, the prophet Amulek had a public discussion with a prominent lawyer, Zeezrom, about this very matter:
Alma 11:32 And Zeezrom said again:
Who is he that shall come? Is it
the Son of God?
33 And he said unto him, Yea.
34 And Zeezrom said again:
Shall he save his people in their
sins? And Amulek answered and said
unto him: I say unto you he shall
not, for it is impossible for him
to deny his word.
35 Now Zeezrom said unto the
people: See that ye remember these
things; for he said there is but
one God; yet he saith that the Son
of God shall come, but he shall
not save his people--as though he
had authority to command God.
36 Now Amulek saith again unto
him: Behold thou hast lied, for
thou sayest that I spake as though
I had authority to command God
because I said he shall not save
his people in their sins.
37 And I say unto you again
that he cannot save them in their
sins; for I cannot deny his word,
and he hath said that no unclean
thing can inherit the kingdom of
heaven; therefore, how can ye be
saved, except ye inherit the
kingdom of heaven? Therefore, ye
cannot be saved in your sins.
|
| QUESTION from:Adam Black, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 10/8/1999: | |
| In Alma 40:11 it says, "...the spirits of all men, as soon as they are departed from this mortal body, yea, the spirits of all men, whether they be good or evil, are taken home to that God who gave them life." . What did Alma mean by this since we know that the wicked cannot endure the presence of God and not even the righteous can dwell with God until after the resurrection and the judgement? | |
Alma said that when a person dies,
their spirit is "taken home to
that God who gave them life" meaning that it returns
to live in the realm of spiritual
existence. (Eccles. 12:7.)
(source: MD, Judgment Day)The actual scripture passage taken in its entire context makes it clear that Alma was speaking of a spiritual realm that had a good side (paradise) and a bad side (spirit prison). We all know that nothing evil can dwell in the presence of God, so this place is not heaven. It is not the place where God dwells. It is a temporary "holding place" for the spirits of God awaiting their resurrection. There are a LOT of the servants of God there, or in other words, angels. There are also the angels of Lucifer there separated from the righteous (see D&C 138). The question might be, "who causes the spirits of the children of men to go to this place after they die?" God does. God's servants, or the representatives of God take the spirit to this place. This is the light that so many have talked about who have had a "near death experience." So in a sense, they meet God by virtue of meeting His representatives who take them to the Spirit World after death. But it is not the final judgement, and it is before the resurrection. Here is the scripture passage:
Alma 40:11 Now, concerning the
state of the soul between death
and the resurrection--Behold, it
has been made known unto me by an
angel, that the spirits of all
men, as soon as they are departed
from this mortal body, yea, the
spirits of all men, whether they
be good or evil, are taken home to
that God who gave them life.
12 And then shall it come to
pass, that the spirits of those
who are righteous are received
into a state of happiness, which
is called paradise, a state of
rest, a state of peace, where they
shall rest from all their troubles
and from all care, and sorrow.
13 And then shall it come to
pass, that the spirits of the
wicked, yea, who are evil--for
behold, they have no part nor
portion of the Spirit of the Lord;
for behold, they chose evil works
rather than good; therefore the
spirit of the devil did enter into
them, and take possession of their
house--and these shall be cast out
into outer darkness; there shall
be weeping, and wailing, and
gnashing of teeth, and this
because of their own iniquity,
being led captive by the will of
the devil.
14 Now this is the state of
the souls of the wicked, yea, in
darkness, and a state of awful,
fearful looking for the fiery
indignation of the wrath of God
upon them; thus they remain in
this state, as well as the
righteous in paradise, until the
time of their resurrection.
|
| QUESTION from:Bruce Larson, Non-Denominational Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 10/10/1999: | |
| I understand there are no significant archealogy finds supporting the Book of Mormon. With this how can the Book of Mormon be relied on as a valid and accurate source of information? | |
Dear Bruce: the fact is there ARE
many archealogical finds that
support the Book of Mormon. Many
books have been written. Many
unexplained artifacts that only
have explanation in the Book of
Mormon. Search the bookstores and
you will find these. But that is
not the real issue here. The real
issue is, if there WERE
archealogical finds that
thoroughly proved that the Book of
Mormon peoples existed, does that
make the gospel taught in the Book
of Mormon true?
I would not think that way. There are many false gospels, religions, and teachings in the world, which can be dated back many millennia. Age does not make a document true. Only God can tell us whether something is true, and that is why we encourage all who would, to pray about the Book of Mormon after sincere study of the book.
Moroni 10:3 Behold, I would exhort
you that when ye shall read these
things, if it be wisdom in God
that ye should read them, that ye
would remember how merciful the
Lord hath been unto the children
of men, from the creation of Adam
even down unto the time that ye
shall receive these things, and
ponder it in your hearts.
4 And when ye shall receive
these things, I would exhort you
that ye would ask God, the Eternal
Father, in the name of Christ, if
these things are not true; and if
ye shall ask with a sincere heart,
with real intent, having faith in
Christ, he will manifest the truth
of it unto you, by the power of
the Holy Ghost.
5 And by the power of the Holy
Ghost ye may know the truth of all
things.
6 And whatsoever thing is good
is just and true; wherefore,
nothing that is good denieth the
Christ, but acknowledgeth that he
is.
7 And ye may know that he is,
by the power of the Holy Ghost;
wherefore I would exhort you that
ye deny not the power of God; for
he worketh by power, according to
the faith of the children of men,
the same today and tomorrow, and
forever.
|
| QUESTION from:Kara Redlin, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 10/12/1999: | |
| Mormon wrote the title page to the Book of Mormon. In the second paragraph, he states that the Book of Ether is also contained in the Book of Mormon. My question is how did Mormon know that the Jaredite plates would be included? I thought that Moroni added that after Mormon had died. | |
Moroni had final edits, and added
to his father's record. Note that
while in the book of Mormon,
Moroni makes some changes or
additions that were commanded by
his father:Mormon 8:1 BEHOLD I, Moroni, do finish the record of my father, Mormon. Behold, I have but few things to write, which things I have been commanded by my father. And then follows the record of Ether about the Jaredites, and then follows his record, the book of Moroni. |
| QUESTION from:Denise Alicea, Non-Denominational Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 10/17/1999: | |
| I have been a visitor of the church of LDS for alittle over a year it feels right to go there. I was in sunday class 1 week before my being baptized and i was taught something that disturbed me. In oue of the teachings they stated and we shall be GODS.This pretty much disturbed me. Coming from a strict christian pentecostal faith, My understanding is that this is the reasons Lucifer was thrown from the heavens because he wanted to be GOD. Please explain. It has been explained by the elders to me but Maybe someone else could help me put these pieces of the puzzle together. Oh I did not get baptized. | |
Lucifer was not cast out of heaven
because he wanted to become a God.
That in an of itself is not evil,
it is a good desire for Jesus
taught us to try, no, He actually
taught is to BE perfect even as He
and Father in Heaven are
perfect.3 Nephi 12:48 Therefore I would that ye should be perfect even as I, or your Father who is in heaven is perfect. Why would Jesus command us to do the "impossible?" It is because it is possible, with God's help. They can do this for us. So you see, it is not an evil desire. So what was Satan's mistake? Rebellion. Insurrection. War. Greed, and complete and total selfishness and ingratitude for the God who gave him life. He fought God, rebelled, and powerless, he was cast out. The heavens wept over them. (see also Revelation 12) D&C 29:36 ...behold, the devil ... rebelled against me, saying, Give me thine honor, which is my power; and also a third part of the hosts of heaven turned he away from me because of their agency; Lucifer was cast out not for wanting to be like God, like Jesus commanded us to do, but for wanting to conquer God. There is BIG difference between that and what we believe God has in store for the obedient. |
| QUESTION from:Amy Henderson, Born Again Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 10/17/1999: | |
| If the book of mormon is true, then where did the people in the Book of Mormon live on this earth because there is no archeological study that proves that these people were real, and that the Book of Mormon is real. In the bible the places that some of the scripture talks about still exist today. Don't you think that if a culture that is described in the book of mormon as being a great culture and fighting many wars would leave behind some evidence of their existance? | |
Is evidence so important for our
faith?What if we looked for evidence of the City of Enoch (which got translated into heaven). We will never find any. So should we disbelieve the Bible because of a lack of evidence for these people, even a city? Even though there are evidences of the ancient American civilizations corresponding to the Book of Mormon peoples, that is not the message of the book of books. It is that Jesus is the Christ. It is a standard for the House of Israel. Here is what the Lord said to Nephi about it: 2 Nephi 29:2 And also, that I may remember the promises which I have made unto thee, Nephi, and also unto thy father, that I would remember your seed; and that the words of your seed should proceed forth out of my mouth unto your seed; and my words shall hiss forth unto the ends of the earth, for a standard unto my people, which are of the house of Israel; The book of Mormon words do hiss forth, even as Isaiah prophesied they would:
Isaiah 5:26 And he will lift up an
ensign to the nations from far,
and will hiss unto them from the
end of the earth: and, behold,
they shall come with speed
swiftly:
2 Nephi 29:3 And because my words
shall hiss forth--many of the
Gentiles shall say: A Bible! A
Bible! We have got a Bible, and
there cannot be any more Bible.
4 But thus saith the Lord God: O
fools, they shall have a Bible;
and it shall proceed forth from
the Jews, mine ancient covenant
people. And what thank they the
Jews for the Bible which they
receive from them? Yea, what do
the Gentiles mean? Do they
remember the travails, and the
labors, and the pains of the Jews,
and their diligence unto me, in
bringing forth salvation unto the
Gentiles?
5 O ye Gentiles, have ye
remembered the Jews, mine ancient
covenant people? Nay; but ye have
cursed them, and have hated them,
and have not sought to recover
them. But behold, I will return
all these things upon your own
heads; for I the Lord have not
forgotten my people.
6 Thou fool, that shall say: A
Bible, we have got a Bible, and we
need no more Bible. Have ye
obtained a Bible save it were by
the Jews?
7 Know ye not that there are
more nations than one? Know ye not
that I, the Lord your God, have
created all men, and that I
remember those who are upon the
isles of the sea; and that I rule
in the heavens above and in the
earth beneath; and I bring forth
my word unto the children of men,
yea, even upon all the nations of
the earth?
8 Wherefore murmur ye, because
that ye shall receive more of my
word? Know ye not that the
testimony of two nations is a
witness unto you that I am God,
that I remember one nation like
unto another? Wherefore, I speak
the same words unto one nation
like unto another. And when the
two nations shall run together the
testimony of the two nations shall
run together also.
9 And I do this that I may
prove unto many that I am the same
yesterday, today, and forever; and
that I speak forth my words
according to mine own pleasure.
And because that I have spoken one
word ye need not suppose that I
cannot speak another; for my work
is not yet finished; neither shall
it be until the end of man,
neither from that time henceforth
and forever.
|
| QUESTION from:Don Moore, Other Religion, Age 25-34, wrote on 10/18/1999: | |
| You'd agree that the LDS PR/marketing department must spend a great amount of money advertising free KJV bibles on TV. But if the Bible corrupted to the point that God HAD to send BoM--and if Mormons generally use the Bible the least of the four standard works--isn't it implicitly dishonest of the LDS to even offer the Bible on TV? You order it, and a few days later a pair of missionaries show up to hand- deliver the KJV. But then they want to tell you the Bible is not sufficient! They solemnly assure you that you really, REALLY need this "other testament of Jesus Christ" in your life! Isn't that an insulting, dishonest and deceptive tactic, kind of like a spiritual 'bait and switch' scam? How does it square with the Gospel Principles chapter on Honesty, which says that "complete honesty is necessary for our salvation" and that "telling only part of the truth" is lying, and therefore of Satan? | |
Dear Don:
I suppose that when viewed with a certain level of cynicism, it may all be viewed this way. But let me explain how I see it. The Bible is what led Joseph Smith to his relationship with God. It got him inspired and taught him to pray (see James 1:5). He did and he was subsequently called as a prophet of God by God and His Son. Who would say that the Bible was not a wonderful book?! It is! I love the Bible. It has led many people to God over the years. We are confident that if people will just become REALLY familiar with their Bible, they will accept the Book of Mormon. Bottom line. |
| QUESTION from:Suzanne Margaret Ostler, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 10/18/1999: | |
| I have a friend that is a Jehovah's Witness and he thinks that we believe that the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are one. I told him that we don't and he said that the Book of Mormon says that we do. I know that it refers to the godhead as acting as one God even though they are seperate beings. He says that every time he asks a Mormon about this they give him the same answer and he thinks that because we don't believe that the Godhead is one, yet our book says that they are, that we are contradicting in our beliefs. What can I tell him? | |
He is playing semantics with you,
and may not even know it. The
term "one" is so open to various
meanings that only the Spirit can
witness to us what it really
means. Surely
no prophecy of the scripture is
of any private interpretation.
(see 2 Peter 1:20)It must be confirmed by the witness of the Spirit of the Holy Ghost. We have so many OTHER scriptures that explicitly define the personality of the Godhead, that they are three separate and distinct beings, that there can be no misunderstanding what the word "one" in the Book of Mormon must mean. It means unity in purpose, glory, and status as the collective Elohim who rule the worlds without number.
2 Nephi 31:20 Wherefore, ye must
press forward with a steadfastness
in Christ, having a perfect
brightness of hope, and a love of
God and of all men. Wherefore, if
ye shall press forward, feasting
upon the word of Christ, and
endure to the end, behold, thus
saith the Father: Ye shall have
eternal life.
21 And now, behold, my beloved
brethren, this is the way; and
there is none other way nor name
given under heaven whereby man can
be saved in the kingdom of God.
And now, behold, this is the
doctrine of Christ, and the only
and true doctrine of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy
Ghost, which is one God, without
end. Amen.
|
| QUESTION from:Jeff Bryant, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 10/19/1999: | |
| I recently had some critisism to "Jot and Tittle" in the Book of Mormon and they could understand how this English term could be in the Book of Mormon. | |
Joseph Smith, being human like us,
would use even as a prophet, the
vocabulary he knew, the
familiarity he had with the Bible
text and style. It is no surprise
that many parts of the Bible which
was so respected by him, would
find its way into the various
works and teachings that Joseph
Smith performed. I recall that it
was the Bible which led Joseph
Smith into the grove of trees in
the first place to pray to God for
guidance as a 14 year old boy, and
then receive his calling as a
prophet of God directly from God
and His Son.
|
| QUESTION from:Carey McInnis, Non-Denominational Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 10/21/1999: | |
| Is it true that Mormons believe that they have the ability to become gods in their afterlives? And if so, how can this idea possibly be presented without sounding blatantly sacreligious (when compared to the Bible's teachings)? | |
I would like to compare this idea
with the Bible's teachings. It is
not so sacreligious when one
considers what has already been
said and promised for the obedient
in the Bible.Consider what the Apostle John wrote in his revelation called Revelation:
Revelation 3:5 He that overcometh,
the same shall be clothed in white
raiment; and I will not blot out
his name out of the book of life,
but I will confess his name before
my Father, and before his
angels.
Revelation 3:12
12 Him that overcometh will I
make a pillar in the temple of my
God, and he shall go no more out:
and I will write upon him the name
of my God, and the name of the
city of my God, [which is] new
Jerusalem, which cometh down out
of heaven from my God: and [I will
write upon him] my new name.
Revelation 3:21 To him that
overcometh will I grant to sit
with me in my throne, even as I
also overcame, and am set down
with my Father in his throne.
If I am not mistaken, a throne is for Kings, like Jesus Christ is, and if He is going to grant for others to sit with Him on His throne as He now sits with His Father on His throne, then this is a very high honor. Even an honor that seems on a fairly even level as God now sits. You could say, from reading this, that they are going to make the obedient who overcome: Gods. That is what I believe, and it is the Bible which teaches this for all to read. |
| QUESTION from:Ned Arnold Buckner, Baptist Christian, Age 50+, wrote on 10/21/1999: | |
| To what does the number 144,000 refer in LDS doctrine? | |
From a revelation in the Doctrine
and Covenants, Joseph Smith taught:
D&C 77:11 Q. What are we to
understand by sealing the one
hundred and forty-four thousand,
out of all the tribes of Israel--
twelve thousand out of every tribe?
A. We are to understand that
those who are sealed are high
priests, ordained unto the holy
order of God, to administer the
everlasting gospel; for they are
they who are ordained out of every
nation, kindred, tongue, and
people, by the angels to whom is
given power over the nations of
the earth, to bring as many as
will come to the church of the
Firstborn. There have been many who have been ordained unto this Holy Order of God, namely, the Melchizedek Priesthood, from all ages of time...not the least of which are those from the Book of Mormon record from ancient America: Alma 49:30 Yea, and there was continual peace among them, and exceedingly great prosperity in the church because of their heed and diligence which they gave unto the word of God, which was declared unto them by Helaman, and Shiblon, and Corianton, and Ammon and his brethren, yea, and by all those who had been ordained by the holy order of God, being baptized unto repentance, and sent forth to preach among the people. |
| QUESTION from:Melanie Newport, Non-Denominational Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 10/23/1999: | |
| Dear BOMA- I am 15 years old, and am going to be taking my 5th missionary discussion next week. I have read some of the Book of Mormon and have prayed a lot. I believe that the church is true and would eventually like to be baptised. However, my parents aren't supportive of my choice of religion, and have already said that they will not sign the baptism consent form. What should I do? | |
Melanie:You are to honor your parents, keep the law, and wait until you are 18 years old if necessary. You should also pray to the Lord, ask for His help and intervention...seek His will on the matter. He will comfort you. Alma taught us that the Lord will be there for us, when things are difficult:
Alma 31:31 O Lord, my heart is
exceedingly sorrowful; wilt thou
comfort my soul in Christ. O Lord,
wilt thou grant unto me that I may
have strength, that I may suffer
with patience these afflictions
which shall come upon me, because
of the iniquity of this people.
32 O Lord, wilt thou comfort
my soul, and give unto me success,
and also my fellow laborers who
are with me--yea, Ammon, and
Aaron, and Omner, and also Amulek
and Zeezrom and also my two sons--
yea, even all these wilt thou
comfort, O Lord. Yea, wilt thou
comfort their souls in Christ.
|
| QUESTION from:Carol L. Reddyq, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 50+, wrote on 10/24/1999: | |
| Answerman: I read your answers on how to build faith. I am doing all this and my life just seems to go along "okay." I know the Lord is helping me because of my efforts, however, it seems all my life it has been hard for me to stay close to him, and for a while I did "dwindle" away from the path. The last nine years or so I have been trying to come back and just don't seem to have the strength to get where I want to go. For a while, I did. I returned to Church and my faith did build, but after several moves in different wards, I slowly got lost again and it's been a struggle to get back. I pray for help and try to do the right things, read scriptures daily, try to be of service to others, be honest, etc. etc. and it seems so hard still. I see others, including members of my family, that seem to have no problem. Why is it so hard for me -- when I know that is what I want, to be active in Church, go to the Temple, etc. etc.? What more can I do, I feel so weak and confused. Thank you. | |
Dear Carol:I too have felt weaknesses, and from time to time the inability to get things done as I want to do... I have recognized this as a temptation, and also I have learned from the Book of Mormon that the Lord gives us weaknesses, to keep us humble. The Lord said to Moroni: Ether 12:27 And if men come unto me I will show unto them their weakness. I give unto men weakness that they may be humble; and my grace is sufficient for all men that humble themselves before me; for if they humble themselves before me, and have faith in me, then will I make weak things become strong unto them. If you want something, but are caught in weakness preventing you from getting it done, then it is time to really come to the Lord in all humility, acknowledging all weaknesses, and asking/pleading for help to overcome them. He will help. This scripture has really helped me. I have applied it in my personal life, and many weaknesses have been strengthened with the Lord's help. I have overcome many weaknesses by specifically praying to ask the Lord to turn them into my strengths. He does. The miraculous help comes, and things change. Things get done. |
| QUESTION from:Christina Annette Adams, Born Again Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 10/29/1999: | |
| I am very curious as to why you would say that what Adam and Eve did in the Garden of Eden was not sin. SIN is anything done against G | |
The scriptures are clear in that
they state that Adam and Eve did
not have a knowledge of good and
evil. The Bible teaches this, and
so does the Book of Mormon (prophet
Lehi). When one does not know the
difference between good and evil,
and they do the wrong thing, it is
a transgression, but not a sin.
They were deceived by Satan, and
being as little children, could not
know for sure or even suspect that
a lie was possible
|
| QUESTION from:Kenneth McKinney, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 11/1/1999: | |
| I have just finished reading the story of Korihor in Alma 30. In v. 25 Korihor said "Ye say that this people is a guilty and a fallen people, because of the transgression of a parent. Behold, I say that a child is not guilty because of its parents." It seems that Korihor is saying something similar to the Second Article of Faith: "We believe that men will be punished for their own sins, and not for Adam's transgression.", and is saying that the Nephite Church and its prophets are teaching something different than what Joseph Smith declared. I Korihor twisting the teachings of the prophets and if so, how? | |
Korihor was using a common technique
for those kind of liars who seek to
twist the truth to their purposes.
It is true as he said, that the
people were not guilty because of
the transgression of a parent
(namely, Adam and Eve). Yet no one
was saying that they were. He set up
a straw man argument to then knock
it down. The fact was that they
truly were a fallen and guilty
people, but because of sin and being
distanced from God.The fall of Adam caused death to come into the world, yet we believe that this is not a punishment for all of us, but is the plan of salvation. We are all supposed to come here to earth to live by faith, and not in the presence of God directly. It was planned that way so that we could develop faith. Adam and Eve chose to eat it of their own free will, and the consequece of their choice came as a result of their disobedience in eating of the forbidden fruit. Their children were not guilty of anything at their birth, they were alive in Christ as is taught in the Book of Mormon by the prophet Mormon (see Moroni 8). All little children are alive in Christ, and are perfect and saved from the Fall, by virtue of the Atonement of Christ. God taught the prophet Mormon these words of Christ:
Moroni 8:8 ...little children are
whole, for they are not capable of
committing sin, wherefore the curse
of Adam is taken from them in me,
that it hath no power over them...
font>
No, the Book of Mormon prophets knew
the truth, that children are not
guilty because of their parents, but
because of the Fall of Adam we all
needed a Savior, a Redeemer, to save
us from death (from the Fall, and
from our Sins). God provided for
that. We will all be resurrected
(saved from the Fall) and we all
have opportunity to become clean
from our sins by repentance (through
the Atonement of Christ).
|
| QUESTION from:Bobby Daniel, Born Again Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 11/3/1999: | |
| I have a fairly strong knowledge of the Bible and feel that i am theologically sound for an evangelical Christian. Is what i believe wrong? And if so, how do i go about finding the "tru | |
Believe and take all the truth that
you have embraced, and see if there
is not some more that you can
embrace. Jesus is the Christ. You
believe that. Jesus is our God and
Savior. You believe that. We also
believe that nothing has changed as
far as God working through prophets
(Amos 3:7), and that there are
modern day prophets / apostles who
are called by Jesus Christ to lead
His Church as in days of old. We
believe in the same organization
that existed in the primitive
church, namely, apostles,
prophets, teachers, evangelists,
and so forth. You can find out the
truth of these things, that the
gospel and Church of Jesus Christ
has been restored by making it a
matter of study then prayer. Pray
with real intent, sincerely,
fearing nothing, and you will get
an answer that confirms the truth
of these things. But doubt, and
you will be as James says, like a
ship tossed on the sea without a
rudder (James 1:5-6)
|
| QUESTION from:Joan Ciesla, Other Religion, Age 35-49, wrote on 11/3/1999: | |
| What is the origin of the Morman religion? Can anyone read the Book of Later Day Saint | |
Jesus Christ is the origin of the
Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints. The term
"mormon" is merely a nickname.
This is an important distinction,
because the actual name of the
Church is based on Jesus Christ,
and not the Book of Mormon. Yes,
anyone can and is actually
encouraged to read the Book of
Mormon, because it testifies of
Christ and is a witness to the
truthfulness of the Restoration.
|
| QUESTION from:Karilyn Moore, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 11/4/1999: | |
| I had some questions about I Nephi Chapter 13. In verse 5 what is the most abominable church. In verse 23 what is the book he is talking about, and in verse 29 what are the plain and precious things which have been taken out. In verse 30 what is the "mixture of seed." In verse 39 what are the "other books." Thank you so much, Karilyn | |
Concerning the abominable church:This much we know, there was an ancient Apostasy from the Church of Jesus Christ; authority of the priesthood was lost... and in the "dark ages" of time there was much wickedness on the earth, and the devil reigned with power over the hearts of men. Good was crushed, even vigilantly guarded against. We have the bilical record to know how bad the devil had control over the Scribes and Pharisees, that they even crucified the Lord Jesus Christ! Amazing wickedness!! Is it any surprise that the devil would seek to continue this wickedness into the dark ages? Even the remnants of the original Church of Jesus Christ were affected as leaders were systematically removed and re-staffed by men who were lacking authority of God, by political leaders (such as Constantine who was a sun- worshipper) who changed the "christian" church and appointed new "bishops." This Apostasy, or falling away, was prophesied in the Bible: 2 Thess 2:3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come (2nd coming of Christ) except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition. The great and abominable church is none other than the church of the devil. He is the founder of it. It includes anything that fights against the Lamb of God. This includes any organization on the earth today that essentially fights against Christ and His Church. Political factions that are anti- Christ (the U.N. is godless BTW), worldly entities that make smut and evil entertainment, corporations and people that run them whose only goal is to make money sometimes at any moral cost and who promote amoral lifestyle, and even the church of satan himself in all of its filthy darkness. All of these collectively make up what is discussed in the Book of Mormon as the church of the devil. For he is the founder of all these things, which fight against Christ and His gospel. In Nephi's vision, the angel taught:
1 Nephi 14:10 ...Behold there are
save two churches only; the one is
the church of the Lamb of God, and
the other is the church of the
devil; wherefore, whoso belongeth
not to the church of the Lamb of God
belongeth to that great church,
which is the mother of abominations;
and she is the whore of all the
earth.
11 ...she had dominion over all the
earth...
12 ...the Church of the Lamb of
God...its numbers were few because
of the wickedness and abominations
of the whore who sat upon many
waters... This whore of all the earth in all of its shades of gray and even the filthy black, the devil being the founder of it, is anything, any organization or person(s), even churches, that would fight against the Lamb of God. It's black and white on this matter. It's about getting on Jesus Christ's true team, or the devils...there is no in between. The devils team is full of gray shades, he'll take what he can, even if he can't make a son of perdition out of everybody. He'll settle for Terrestrial Kingdom, if it means being cut off from the Father in Heaven who cast him out of heaven after the war in heaven. v.23 ...that book, is none other than the Bible. It contains great worth to the gentiles in the world. It is helping prepare many of the gentiles throughout the world for attaining at least the Terrestrial Kingdom (vs the Telestial), and hopefully through a more complete conversion which includes accepting and believing the Book of Mormon, the Celesial Kingdom of God. There is exaltation and eternal life only by full faith in Jesus Christ as our only hope of salvation, and by accepting Him through His ordinances (such as baptism, temple, etc.), which are only to be found in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. How can it be said more boldly? It is the truth. There is a true prophet of Christ living today. He is currently Gordon B. Hinckley, and it started with Joseph Smith whom Christ and His Father personally called in the sacred grove in 1820. There were many parts of the Bible which were removed by wicked and conspiring men during the dark ages. Even the Christian Church during that time was affected by this great apostasy, and its leaders did these things: changed the word of God. Nephi received a vision (in 600 BC) that this would take place, so the Lord knew it, and planned for it. There was a restoration of the gospel of Jesus Christ planned for the last days, and the Lord provided the Book of Mormon which supplements those truths which remained in the Bible. Together, they are a powerful force for good, and go hand in hand as was prophesied by the prophet Ezekiel in Ezekiel 37:15-17, which says that the stick of Judah (the Bible), and the stick of Joseph (the Book of Mormon) would be joined together in one hand. It is so. Our "quadruple" combination scripture is a testament of the fulfillment of this prophecy, and we hold the Bible and Book of Mormon in one hand, along with the D&C and PofGP. The mixture of Nephi's seed are the Lamanites who live throughout the Americas and on many islands of the sea. These had dissenting Nephites among them before the Nephites were destroyed by war, and so the Lamanites are a mixture of the seed of Nephi and his companions, and the seed of those who originally stayed with his wicked brother Laman. |
| QUESTION from:Karilyn Moore, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 11/4/1999: | |
| In Genesis 1:26 who is God refering to when he says, "let US make man in OUR image..." who is us, and our? Thank you | |
I would not presume to know all of
the parties that were present that
day, but I believe it safe in saying
that at least two of them were God
the Father and Jesus Christ. God is
more than one being. Our God is
Heavenly Father, His beloved son
Jesus Christ, and the Holy Ghost...a
personage of spirit. These three
separate beings collectively make up
what we call God, the God whom we
worship. They are one God, one in
purpose, might, and glory, yet they
are three separate and distinct
beings. The use of these plural
nouns in the Bible are a significant
hint as to the true nature and
personality of our God.
|
| QUESTION from:Goran. Radic, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 11/25/2000: | |
| Hello! I was always wandering where Abinadi learned that Adam and Eve couldn't have had children when they were still in Eden. As far as I understand what happened, Adam partook of the fruit so he could be with Eve and replenish the earth, after she had partaken and was to be cast from the garden. Did he know he couldn't have reproduced while in garden? If he did, he would have partaken sooner and not because Eve did it and he wanted to be with her. I hope I am not too confusing here. Bottom line is, apart from Abinadi's statement I haven't found much else in the scriptures to indicate Adam and Eve were infertile in garden. I believe what Abinadi said was true, but it sure doesn't click into my mind. i am sorry, if you discussed this topic before. If so, I would be most grateful for your directing me to the archive where it can be found. Thank you in advance. | |
It was Lehi who made the statement
about Adam and Eve, and their
child-like state:
2 Ne. 2:22 And now, behold, if
Adam had not transgressed he would
not have fallen, but he would have
remained in the garden of Eden.
And all things which were created
must have remained in the same
state in which they were after
they were created; and they must
have remained forever, and had no
end.
23 And they would have had no
children; wherefore they would
have remained in a state of
innocence, having no joy, for they
knew no misery; doing no good, for
they knew no sin.
A state of innocence, is different than being infertile. They were just as little children, full grown as they were, their minds were innocent, and this is the reason that they had no children. Unaware. Innocent, like a little child. |
| QUESTION from:Doug Schultz, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 11/25/2000: | |
| This is a question that has bothered me for years, and I would like the best answer you can give me in reguards to this doctrine. The LDS Bible Dictionary printed in the back of the LDS version of the King James Bible states under 'Fall of Adam', "The process by which mankind became mortal on this earth... There was no sin, no death, and no children among any of the earthly creations..." Now, I'm not saying man evolved or didn't evolve, but I do believe that most if not all life on earth evolved and that procreation existed on the earth before 4000 BC. There is much evidence proving life and death prior to Adam... Including the dinosaurs. What is your explaination of this apparent doctrinal/historical paradox? | |
There can be no "evolution" if
there is no death. Evolution
assumes death. The scriptures are
clear, and especially Lehi who
wrote:2 Ne. 2: 22 And now, behold, if Adam had not transgressed he would not have fallen, but he would have remained in the garden of Eden. And all things which were created must have remained in the same state in which they were after they were created; and they must have remained forever, and had no end. Remaining forever means no death, and no death means no evolution is possible. They would have remained forever, and had no end. It seems so clear to me what the scriptures teach about this. There can be no mistake, and even the Bible Dictionary says the same thing. How is it explained? How can it be possible that there are mounds of evidence "proving" evolution is true? First of all, there are theories, and not evidence when it comes to evolution. It is called the "theory of evolution" and not the "fact of evolution." It was an idea that was postulated by a man based on a relative few findings, and it makes sense to those who do not believe the scriptures on the matter of the Fall of Adam, and of Adam being the very first man as the scriptures teach. What is the explanation? Well, one of the two is false, they can not co-exist, one truly being pitted against the other. I personally have investigated the matter sufficient to discover that the so-called evidences of many of these ancient bones have been wildly speculated upon, only later to discover that there was a hoax. Piltdown man, a paleontological "man who never was" is a good example of deliberate fraud. It was discovered in 1953 that bones thought to be of ancient man's skull, were actually a jaw bone of an orangutan. Yes there have been hoaxes, and it is not the scriptures that are the hoax. See http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/origins/ piltdown.txt for more information on this example. |
| QUESTION from:Darren Salomons, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 11/27/2000: | |
| I was baptized into the church about 9 months ago. I am a happy lds member and enjoy being a part of this church and its cause. I truly believe that this is the true religion(or else I wouldnt have joined :) ) Anyway... my question has to deal with the holy spirit. My mother always accuses me that by joining the church I am proclaiming that my entire family is wrong in their beliefs. It is a very hard subject to talk about with my family and I don't want to hurt anyone's feelings. I have grown up with my family and I know that my grandparents, although are not LDS, are followers of Jesus Christ. Their lives are devoted to following the teachings. I see this shine through their lives. However my family is unable to accept the teachings of this church and base most of their reasoning that Joseph Smith being a false prophet of God. My mother continually tries to remind me of how blessed our family has been. I am in total agreement with her. I feel as if her argument is that since none of my family are members of the lds church, their blessings are a result of following the truthfulness of their religion and beliefs. Maybe she is saying that people are blessed only if they follow the truthfulness of a single religion. I don't really know where to go on that argument. I feel as if my family has good intentions. They all have a warm heart. Do they feel the spirit of the lord in their life? Does the spirit of the lord direct them to make right choices? Is this only a gift through baptism? I see the 'light of christ' shine through them but I feel there is something more. Truly I feel that my grandma above all is a women of God. Total devotion to the teachings of the bible. Would a women who strives to be better everyday and follow God and Jesus Christ be denied a spot in the Lord's heavenly kingdom simply because she was not baptized. I am not doubting the church or it's teachings but simply trying to make sense of everything. What do you think? | |
Your Grandma IS a woman of God!
Blessings come for a variety of
reasons, and the Lord knows the
reasons...He gives the blessings
when certain requirements are met.
The prophet Joseph Smith received
a revelation from the Lord
saying:
D&C 130: 20 There is a law,
irrevocably decreed in heaven
before the foundations of this
world, upon which all blessings
are predicated-
D&C 130: 21 And when we obtain
any blessing from God, it is by
obedience to that law upon which
it is predicated.
Many people obey the law of work, even smart work, and they earn a good living by their industry, because the Lord blesses for that reason. But it is not forever. Others obey the law of quality and quantity family time, and by virtue of that, the Lord blesses them with close and strong families. But they are not forever families by that alone. Others obey the law of gospel study and adherence to the laws of Jesus Christ, and they individually or as a family reap the blessings that the Lord gives out for obedience to that, which is peace and joy. But it is not necessarily the _gift_ of the Holy Ghost!...which is a _constant_ companion. I will be the first to say that the Latter-day Saints do not have the corner on close or strong families. It is a function of what people do to achieve this. People and families who truly live the gospel of Jesus Christ which is plain in the Bible, as well as the Book of Mormon, are golden contacts who would readily accept the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints when it is presented to them. If they don't, it is because of some sin, the most common being pride. The prophet Nephi taught of our day:
2 Ne. 26: 20 And the Gentiles are
lifted up in the pride of their
eyes, and have stumbled, because
of the greatness of their
stumbling block, that they have
built up many churches;
nevertheless, they put down the
power and miracles of God, and
preach up unto themselves their
own wisdom and their own learning,
that they may get gain and grind
upon the face of the poor.
2 Ne. 28: 12 Because of pride, and
because of false teachers, and
false doctrine, their churches
have become corrupted, and their
churches are lifted up; because of
pride they are puffed up.
2 Ne. 28: 13 They rob the poor
because of their fine sanctuaries;
they rob the poor because of their
fine clothing; and they persecute
the meek and the poor in heart,
because in their pride they are
puffed up.
2 Ne. 28: 14 They wear stiff
necks and high heads; yea, and
because of pride, and wickedness,
and abominations, and whoredoms,
they have all gone astray save it
be a few, who are the humble
followers of Christ; nevertheless,
they are led, that in many
instances they do err because they
are taught by the precepts of men.
2 Ne. 28: 15 O the wise, and the
learned, and the rich, that are
puffed up in the pride of their
hearts, and all those who preach
false doctrines, and all those who
commit whoredoms, and pervert the
right way of the Lord, wo, wo, wo
be unto them, saith the Lord God
Almighty, for they shall be thrust
down to hell!
16 Wo unto them that turn aside
the just for a thing of naught and
revile against that which is good,
and say that it is of no worth!
For the day shall come that the
Lord God will speedily visit the
inhabitants of the earth; and in
that day that they are fully ripe
in iniquity they shall perish.
17 But behold, if the inhabitants
of the earth shall repent of their
wickedness and abominations they
shall not be destroyed, saith the
Lord of Hosts.
18 But behold, that great and
abominable church, the whore of
all the earth, must tumble to the
earth, and great must be the fall
thereof.
19 For the kingdom of the devil
must shake, and they which belong
to it must needs be stirred up
unto repentance, or the devil will
grasp them with his everlasting
chains, and they be stirred up to
anger, and perish;
20 For behold, at that day shall
he rage in the hearts of the
children of men, and stir them up
to anger against that which is
good.
21 And others will he pacify, and
lull them away into carnal
security, that they will say: All
is well in Zion; yea, Zion
prospereth, all is well-and thus
the devil cheateth their souls,
and leadeth them away carefully
down to hell.
So in answer to your question, your Grandmother has felt the Spirit sufficient to motivate her to strive to live the gospel of Jesus Christ. Your family too. The GIFT of the Holy Ghost comes after baptism by the laying on hands, the Melchizedek Priesthood ordinance that Christ taught to His disciples. But it is PRIDE that keeps good people from joining the Church. The Book of Mormon prophets knew of the pride that would exist today and they wrote: Morm. 8: 36 And I know that ye do walk in the pride of your hearts; and there are none save a few only who do not lift themselves up in the pride of their hearts, unto the wearing of very fine apparel, unto envying, and strifes, and malice, and persecutions, and all manner of iniquities; and your churches, yea, even every one, have become polluted because of the pride of your hearts. Moro. 8: 27 Behold, my son, I will write unto you again if I go not out soon against the Lamanites. Behold, the pride of this nation, or the people of the Nephites, hath proven their destruction except they should repent. This is the very reason that the Nephite nation fell. Pride. Mormon says that all have it, save a few. It creeps up on people. It causes them to think that they are better than the next guy. It causes them to think that they have no sin or guilt. It is the reason that people compare themselves with others, to say as the ancient Amalekite said to the prophets who brought them the gospel: Alma 21: 5 Therefore, as Aaron entered into one of their synagogues to preach unto the people, and as he was speaking unto them, behold there arose an Amalekite and began to contend with him, saying: What is that thou hast testified? Hast thou seen an angel? Why do not angels appear unto us? Behold are not this people as good as thy people? Pride. And it will be the downfall of even good people, if they do not become truly humble and accept the fulness of the gospel of Jesus Christ, which is in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I testify of it! |
| QUESTION from:Chuck Woolery, Other Religion, Age 35-49, wrote on 12/6/2000: | |
| Many nations of the world have signed a treaty to create an International Criminal Court to prosocute individuals who commit genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes. The Catholic Pope has endorsed it. Some policy makers in the US who worship National Sovereignty over human rights are opposing the ICC and believe US citizens/generals/leaders should be excluded from prosocution in such a court. What does the scriptures say about holding individuals accountable for mass killings, rape, torture and other efforts to eliminate a race or faith based group? White Supremecy groups are talking about developing a biological weapon to kill blacks. Are there any groups who fear Mormans who might be considering the same time of genocide? | |
It's not a worship of national
sovereignty, but a concern over
authority. What do the scriptures
say about holding individuals
accountable for mass killings?
Jesus taught the Nephites:3 Ne. 12:21 Ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, and it is also written before you, that thou shalt not kill, and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment of God; Read more of what the resurrected Savior said about anger... Jesus did not address the question of what to DO to such people. It is a secular government question now, and every country is different. There is no established "global" authority. In a world where ecclesiastical authority reigns (not our current world), such a murderer would be judged worthy of death, such as in the days of Moses where such authority was in place (see Numbers Chapter 35 We do not have ecclesiastical authority, but when Jesus Christ comes again to rule and reign, He would have that authority, but I believe all the murderers will be gone by then. The earth will be burned at his coming (see D&C 29:9 What do the scriptures say about holding judges accountable, such as the judges that would be sent to serve on the ICC, should it be ratified by treaty, judges sent potentially by wicked nations, even nations that are hostile towards one another? We see the power that even our own Supreme Court has, can we imagine the power of a Global Supreme Court on crime (the ICC)? Can this be trusted? The Lord LIKES the Constitution of the United States of America, a banner to the world. He would be pleased if this were extended to all the world, as He states in scripture. The ICC is unfortunately, contrary to the Constitution, or rather, a very different structure and standard altogether. Here is what Jesus Christ said about the Constitution:
D&C 98: 5 And that law of the land
which is constitutional,
supporting that principle of
freedom in maintaining rights and
privileges, belongs to all
mankind, and is justifiable before
me.
6 Therefore, I, the Lord, justify
you, and your brethren of my
church, in befriending that law
which is the constitutional law of
the land;
D&C 101: 77 According to the laws
and constitution of the people,
which I have suffered to be
established, and should be
maintained for the rights and
protection of all flesh, according
to just and holy principles;
80 And for this purpose have I
established the Constitution of
this land, by the hands of wise
men whom I raised up unto this
very purpose, and redeemed the
land by the shedding of blood.
D&C 109:
54
...may...the Constitution of our
land...be established forever.
So you see, it is not a certain people or group worshipping national sovereignty, but people who understand how the Lord Himself feels about the Constitution of this land, which was set up by Him through righteous men (the Founding Fathers). The Lord has said that the Constitution "...belongs to all mankind." If we depart from this by joining the ICC, a court which has no comparable "Founding Fathers," no scriptural authority, no sanction from the Lord...well, I am concerned with that. The ICC is actually a scary thing for many reasons, to many to go into here. Here's a good article I found which tells all about The origins and goals of the ICC. A long article, but worth the read. We should all be concerned about anything that "replaces" the Constitution which the Lord set up, and the ICC most assuredly replaces it. It could be law enacted through ignorance, by Treaty between nations. |
| QUESTION from:Ruben, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 12/14/2000: | |
| Today I talked to a Catholic that went to Utah and felt she was ostracized because when she told an LDS member that she was not going to convert, that sister never ever talked to her ever again. I've heard many stories alike about other nonmembers living in Utah, that for some reason because they decide not to convert, members of the church stop being friends to you. Isn't this wrong and could it be why the rate of church growth has somewhat decreased percentagewise. I know in the Book of Mormon when the members of the church were righteous, they prospered but when they were lifted up in pride 'holier than thou' stance the church stopped growing. What can we do about our nonmember friends who decide not to become converts at all. Why do so many members ostracize nonmembers? Is it because of pride? How can people in Utah that are nonmembers live comfortably without being ostracized by members once they decide they are not going to convert? | |
Ruben: Imagine planting a seed,
and watering it, and never leaving
it, and spending 10 years to wait
for it to grow into a tree, while
all around us were trees grown and
bearing fruit, and we never
harvested, because we waited on a
few seeds...I do not doubt that this woman felt this way, but it in no way represents the whole of the Church, but a very specific experience of one person. We as LDS are just people with feelings too. I can imagine that if one of my non-member friends specifically told me that they would never convert, that this could be interpreted that they are not interested in being a friend. It could also be a challenge. It could be the frank truth. The best thing that we can do is to be friends to everyone. Personally, I have limited time, and when I find time for friends outside of the time that I need to spend with my wife and children, it has got to be spent well. If there are people who openly tell me that they are not interested in my faith, then I am OBLIGATED to keep searching for the Lord's elect. Time is precious, and the work is urgent. If that person interprets my behavior as ostracizing, then that really is their misjudgement. I want to help people come unto Christ. There is a harvest taking place as we speak. 12 And it came to pass that the hearts of the sons of Mosiah, and also those who were with them, took courage to go forth unto the Lamanites to declare unto them the word of God. 13 And it came to pass when they had arrived in the borders of the land of the Lamanites, that they separated themselves and departed one from another, trusting in the Lord that they should meet again at the close of their harvest; for they supposed that great was the work which they had undertaken. (see Alma 17) We see that Ammon was able to work with the right people, not just anyone, but the right people that lead to the greatest harvest! He worked the orchard smart. A missionary seeks people out, and moves swiftly to where the harvest is, and does not harvest where there is no fruit, or where people do not express an interest. I do not feel it my calling or duty to spend my days hanging around people who are not interested or are against my faith; I can do so much more good finding people that will be befriended into the gospel of Jesus Christ. It really is a matter of priorities in how we will spend out time. If the people of the world are truly the CROP, and as Jesus compares them to a HARVEST, then we should spend our time trying to make a good harvest for Jesus Christ, we labor in His field! It is better to lay up treasures for Him than to work with a plant that won't grow, does not respond to water, or a plant or tree that bears no fruit after a reasonable season. We want to collect "fruit" for the Lord! This is not ostracizing the tree, because we'll probably notice the tree again when it has some fruit to harvest, rather, this is about moving to better part of the orchard, and working with the parts that are ready to harvest! It is how we look at it, and how we feel about it. |
| QUESTION from:Dan Smith, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 12/20/2000: | |
| If Joseph Smith did, indeed, stick a staff in the ground in Missouri or Ohio and tell those with him "This is the site of the ancient city of Manti, the southernmost city of the Nephite Civilization", why do FARMS and all the other fools keep looking for the Nephite civilization in Central America? Is it a way to get free vacations paid for by the gullible? | |
Dan:There appears to be the most available physical evidence in Central and South America with all of the ancient ruins that beg for a Nephite civilization to be associated with it! FARMS does have some very strong points in their studies and findings, hardly that of what fools would speak. Now, don't think that I am a big fan of FARMS, I have read many of their publications... but if I had any suggestion at all for the FARMS scholar, it would be to give more credence and faith in the early statements of Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery, and Brigham Young concerning these things. These three most assuredly favored the United States area as viable Nephite territory. We know that Joseph Smith identified certain Nephite Cities and events in North America that scholars are trying to place in Central America. We also have the account of where the plates and records are literally (the New York Hill Cumorah) according to Brigham Young's statement concerning what Oliver Cowdery told him. It would lead us to believe that the Book of Mormon Nephite civilization took place as much in North America as it did in Central or South America. Here is the extent of Book of Mormon geography in the Book of Mormon: Alma 22: 32 And now, it was only the distance of a day and a half's journey for a Nephite, on the line Bountiful and the land Desolation, from the east to the west sea; and thus the land of Nephi and the land of Zarahemla were nearly surrounded by water, there being a small neck of land between the land northward and the land southward. Sounds like the Panama Canal area, but it could also be the Great Lakes as the "seas" as well. Large bodies of water are often called "seas." Now there's a few more such scriptures in the Book of Mormon, but not much :) |
| QUESTION from:Kirk Robert Thorne, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 12/24/2000: | |
| In the book of Ether it talks about the brother of Jared building barges to cross the ocean with and it says that he was commanded to put a hole in the top and in the bottom. Why would he need a hole at the bottom? And what was the shape of the barges? | |
Many people have theorized as to
the shape of the barge. A
football comes to mind. But we
know from the record that they
were pointed or "peaked" at the
ends (like a submarine).
Ether 2:16 And the Lord said: Go
to work and build, after the
manner of barges which ye have
hitherto built. And it came to
pass that the brother of Jared did
go to work, and also his brethren,
and built barges after the manner
which they had built, according to
the instructions of the Lord. And
they were small, and they were
light upon the water, even like
unto the lightness of a fowl upon
the water.
17 And they were built after a
manner that they were exceedingly
tight, even that they would hold
water like unto a dish; and the
bottom thereof was tight like unto
a dish; and the sides thereof were
tight like unto a dish; and the
ends thereof were peaked; and the
top thereof was tight like unto a
dish; and the length thereof was
the length of a tree; and the door
thereof, when it was shut, was
tight like unto a dish.
Now we can theorize as to the reasons for the hole. We have the hind-sight of knowing a little about submarine technology to understand some of the logical reasons. It should be remembered that they were "couped up" in these small vessels for a long time. Ether 6:11 And thus they were driven forth, three hundred and forty and four days upon the water. People need water to bathe and wash. The animals that they brought with them need to eat and there needs to be a place for all of the refuse to go. A hole in the bottom, pressurized, would be a perfect way to dispose of things, and to keep things clean for the entire year of being couped up in a small room. I can only imagine all of the other wonders that a hole into the bottom of the ocean waters would provide in scenic views. If there were whales or fish nearby, these would be visible. Now, this is only my imagination! It may be an entirely different scene. There may be some very sophisticated mechanisms and systems involved in the openings on the top and bottom of these vessels. We know that the record states that they were exceedingly tight, even that they would hold water like unto a dish; and the bottom thereof was tight like unto a dish; and the sides thereof were tight like unto a dish; I always remember that the Lord instructed the Brother of Jared on how to make these barges. |
| QUESTION from:Jim Simon, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 50+, wrote on 12/28/2000: | |
| This is for information for
all "answermen" who
have to answer the critics of the
Book of Mormon
saying "at Jerusalem" instead of
Bethlehem for
the place of Christ's birth. 2 Kings 14:20 "And they brought him on horses: and he was buried at Jerusalem with his fathers in the city of David". | |
Thanks Jim: This is a perfect
example from the Bible, for what I
believe should be obvious to any
reasonable mind. Thanks for
sharing!
|
| QUESTION from:Fabio De Moraes, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 12/31/2000: | |
| first of all thanks for doing such a great job in responding to people's questions. Well my question may seem a little silly, I have read the book of mormon several times and I would like to understand who are the Lamanites today. Are they the indians in central and South America or their lineage blood is pretty much mixed with the european colonizers. I am from Brazil and think that my question has some relevance to me. I would appreciate your thoughts on the matter. thank you. | |
Fabio De Moraes:Well this is really a good question, and one that all of us could think about. My Patriarchal Blessing says that I am of the Tribe of Joseph, specifically through Ephraim. That would seem to indicate that I have pure blood lines back to him, and maybe I do. But my genealogy would indicate something a little different. My direct ancestors came from Sweden, Switzerland, Denmark, England, Ireland. That's a mix. I'm sure most all are very mixed, includings those from Brazil. Genealogy is such an interesting and fascinating thing! Visit www.familysearch.org to search for some names using the Church's pedigree chart features. There are so many combinations possible in our ancestry. This makes the blood lines less pure and more fuzzy. Possibly the lineage is the "majority" lineage that is pronounced upon us. As for the Lamanites, this is no different. There are many mixtures. There were many Nephites who dissented to the Lamanites, and even vice versa. Lots of mixing between the Nephite and Lamanite blood lines over time during the Book of Mormon era alone.
Alma 43: 4 For behold, it came to
pass that the Zoramites became
Lamanites;
Alma 43: 13 ...and thus the
Nephites were compelled, alone, to
withstand against the Lamanites,
who were a compound of Laman and
Lemuel, and the sons of Ishmael,
and all those who had dissented
from the Nephites, who were
Amalekites and Zoramites, and the
descendants of the priests of Noah.
Here's the easy answer: We are of the House of Israel. The Lamanites are of Lehi's and Ishmael's blood lines, plus their wives, wherever they are from. Its a mix from the beginning. Lehi was Manasseh, Ishmael was of Ephraim. And Laman and Lemuel both took wives from Ishmael's family,, as did Nephi and Sam, so they were all 50/50 from the start, but direct descendents of Joseph. (see 1 Nephi 7) In the Year 2000, the Lamanites are all over the American Continent, and not just in Central or South America. They are also on the islands like Tonga, Hawaii, Somoa, etc. Who knows, I might have a little "Lamanite" blood in me. In fact, I do, because I also am of the Tribe of Joseph. |
| QUESTION from:Amanda, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 1/5/2001: | |
| This question came to me in reading another question: If God the Father was once a man and sinned and repented and became a god and our God, how is it that Christ could come up through pre- existence and through this mortal life without committing even one little sin? | |
Amanda:
We are speculating here. First of all, we don't know or even teach that God our Father was once a man who sinned. It is not an official Church doctrine that He was even once a man. I believe it is true, and it has been taught by General Authorities (ie King Follet discourse), but it is not taught as a doctrine, or else it would exist in the official canon of scripture. One day it may be, but it is not there now. That being said, we can speculate only on that particular issue. Why did not Jesus sin? Well, what happens to people who are born into darkness, blinded by the craftiness of men, taught falsehoods, and not taught in the ways of the Lord> People under those conditions transgress and sin, and make mistakes. Not one of us is sinless, because to some degree we have made mistakes. But not Jesus... It seems obvious that Jesus was prepared to be the Savior of the World, from the foundations of the world, and it was not left to chance. For instance, he knew he must be "about His Father's business" and told his mother Mary that very thing when he was only 12, 50 And they understood not the saying which he spake unto them.(see Luke 2:49-50). In other words, it was not Mary and Joseph who taught Jesus that he must be about his Father's business. They had no idea what he was talking about. So who taught Jesus? Either his real Father, God the Father, or the angels He sent. Jesus was taught. Jesus knew. He was not left to figure out his role by accident or chance. He was strengthened by angels, even during his Atonement. He was not alone. In the Book of Mormon we learn of the great prophet Nephi, son of Helaman, who was ministered to by angels on a daily basis:
3 Nephi 7:17 ...And Nephi did
minister with power and with great
authority.
18 And it came to pass that [the
Nephites] were angry with him,
even because he had greater power
than they, for it were not
possible that they could
disbelieve his words, for so great
was his faith on the Lord Jesus
Christ that angels did minister
unto him daily.
19 And in the name of Jesus did he
cast out devils and unclean
spirits; and even his brother did
he raise from the dead, after he
had been stoned and suffered death
by the people.
20 And the people saw it, and did
witness of it, and were angry with
him because of his power; and he
did also do many more miracles, in
the sight of the people, in the
name of Jesus.
Angels did minister unto him daily. Angels give strength to the valiant who are called upon to do extraordinary things. Joseph Smith received a large portion of the ministering of angels, to help him with his calling, and to keep him focused, on the straight and narrow. Numerous other prophets have had the same things. To help them, not to flatter them. Jesus Christ received the same, visits from angels, and even during his great Atonement in the Garden of Gethsemane, Jesus was strengthened by an angel. He did not do it alone, Jesus was helped. Luke 22: 43 And there appeared an angel unto him from heaven, strengthening him. If Jesus was independently strong enough, no angel was necessary to increase his faith and desire, but God made sure that Jesus would not fail, and sent help when it was needed. Nothing like this, nothing so important to the very Plan of Salvation, is left to chance. Jesus was prepared, protected, and helped, not because Jesus was weak, but because God works as a team. Jesus was helped even as a baby when Herod destroyed all the babies in the country, hoping to kill Jesus. God knew of the evil plans of Herod, and intervened. How many more times God intervened to make sure that Jesus was all that He needed to be to be the perfect, sinless, Savior of the world, we can only speculate. But Jesus was most certainly a very special child, with knowledge given him from heaven to prepare him for his life's mission. The most important mission ever performed by anyone who ever lived. |
| QUESTION from:Chris Caperton, Other Religion, Age 35-49, wrote on 1/17/2001: | |
| The load-up page has a statement that when Christ appeared to Jos. Smith that he said that all the churches were corrupt and an abomination. Would a Mormon still adhere to this statement? Why or why not? thanks | |
Chris:
The statement which Jesus Christ made to Joseph Smith is scripture, and as such is doctrine, and is true. Possibly there is a negative reaction to the word "corrupt" which seems harsh at first blush, but the dictionary defines the word as follows:
1. Containing errors or
alterations, as a text: a corrupt
translation. These changes can be very small. They can seem very insignificant. But nevertheless, if the original Church of Jesus Christ and portions of His scipture have been changed even a little bit from what he first established, then to call that corrupt seems very appropriate. It is not an insult. There indeed was an apostasy from the true gospel of Jesus Christ, during the so-called dark ages. This was prophesied in scripture (see link below) The Book of Mormon prophet Nephi saw this time period and wrote about his vision of it:
1 AND it came to pass that the
angel spake unto me, saying: Look!
And I looked and beheld many
nations and kingdoms.
2 And the angel said unto me: What
beholdest thou? And I said: I
behold many nations and kingdoms.
3 And he said unto me: These are
the nations and kingdoms of the
Gentiles.
4 And it came to pass that I saw
among the nations of the Gentiles
the formation of a great church.
5 And the angel said unto me:
Behold the formation of a church
which is most abominable above all
other churches, which slayeth the
saints of God, yea, and tortureth
them and bindeth them down, and
yoketh them with a yoke of iron,
and bringeth them down into
captivity.
6 And it came to pass that I
beheld this great and abominable
church; and I saw the devil that
he was the founder of it.
7 And I also saw gold, and silver,
and silks, and scarlets, and fine-
twined linen, and all manner of
precious clothing; and I saw many
harlots.
8 And the angel spake unto me,
saying: Behold the gold, and the
silver, and the silks, and the
scarlets, and the fine-twined
linen, and the precious clothing,
and the harlots, are the desires
of this great and abominable
church.
9 And also for the praise of the
world do they destroy the saints
of God, and bring them down into
captivity.
24 And the angel of the Lord said
unto me: Thou hast beheld that the
book proceeded forth from the
mouth of a Jew; and when it
proceeded forth from the mouth of
a Jew it contained the fulness of
the gospel of the Lord, of whom
the twelve apostles bear record;
and they bear record according to
the truth which is in the Lamb of
God.
25 Wherefore, these things go
forth from the Jews in purity unto
the Gentiles, according to the
truth which is in God.
26 And after they go forth by the
hand of the twelve apostles of the
Lamb, from the Jews unto the
Gentiles, thou seest the formation
of that great and abominable
church, which is most abominable
above all other churches; for
behold, they have taken away from
the gospel of the Lamb many parts
which are plain and most precious;
and also many covenants of the
Lord have they taken away.
27 And all this have they done
that they might pervert the right
ways of the Lord, that they might
blind the eyes and harden the
hearts of the children of men.
28 Wherefore, thou seest that
after the book hath gone forth
through the hands of the great and
abominable church, that there are
many plain and precious things
taken away from the book, which is
the book of the Lamb of God.
29 And after these plain and
precious things were taken away it
goeth forth unto all the nations
of the Gentiles; and after it
goeth forth unto all the nations
of the Gentiles, yea, even across
the many waters which thou hast
seen with the Gentiles which have
gone forth out of captivity, thou
seest-because of the many plain
and precious things which have
been taken out of the book, which
were plain unto the understanding
of the children of men, according
to the plainness which is in the
Lamb of God-because of these
things which are taken away out of
the gospel of the Lamb, an
exceedingly great many do stumble,
yea, insomuch that Satan hath
great power over them.
Numerous scripture links RE: |
| QUESTION from:Jerry Marshall, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 1/26/2001: | |
| I read an article by Allen J Christenson, published as a FARMS update in the magazine Insights, February, 1996 that says there is evidence of man and civilization on the west coast of North and South America that dates back to around 10,000-12,000BC. The article was in response to the Bering Strait Land Bridge and how people were not able to come across it until around 9500BC and therefore no one lived in North or South America until then. The article is trying to say that it was possible for man to take long oceanic voyages and therefore were able to come to the New World before they came across on the land bridge. My question then is how does the fact that if the Church teaches that before the Fall of Adam there was no death on the Earth and that Adam and Eve were the first humans on Earth, how can we find evidence of human life dating back to 12,000BC if the fall of Adam took place around 4000BC? | |
Jerry:The scriptures are clear on the matter of Adam and Eve. They were the first humans on the earth, and were our parents. It was Adam and Eve who were created after all else was on the earth: Gen. 1: 26 And God
said, Let us make man in our
image, after our likeness: and let
them have dominion over the fish
of the sea, and over the fowl of
the air, and over the cattle, and
over all the earth, and over every
creeping thing that creepeth upon
the earth.
28 And God blessed them, and God
said unto them, Be fruitful, and
multiply, and replenish the earth,
and subdue it: At this point, when they were placed in the Garden, they were childless, and would not have had any children unless they partook of the fruit. All things would have remained in the same state in which they were created, according to the words of the prophet Lehi:
2 Ne. 2: 22
22 And now, behold, if Adam had
not transgressed he would not have
fallen, but he would have remained
in the garden of Eden. And all
things which were created must
have remained in the same state in
which they were after they were
created; and they must have
remained forever, and had no end.
23 And they would have had no
children; wherefore they would
have remained in a state of
innocence, having no joy, for they
knew no misery; doing no good, for
they knew no sin.
From these two scriptures it becomes perfectly clear what the scriptures teach. There were no humans on the earth before Adam and Eve. God placed them here. And they had no children until 4000 BC when the record began and the genealogy is revealed. People used to say the earth was flat. Mistakes in science theory have been known to occur, not the least of which is the totally false concept of organic evolution, which is still taught today by uninspired teachers. Even though dates have been measured in the scientific method, there may be other factors involved not known to science as yet, which may lead to erroneous conclusions. I have complete and total trust in the scriptures, the word of God, and as Nephi encouraged, I want to place my trust in God and not in the arm of flesh.
2 Ne. 4: 34 O Lord, I have
trusted in thee, and I will trust
in thee forever. I will not put my
trust in the arm of flesh; for I
know that cursed is he that
putteth his trust in the arm of
flesh. Yea, cursed is he that
putteth his trust in man or maketh
flesh his arm.
2 Ne. 28: 31 Cursed is he that
putteth his trust in man, or
maketh flesh his arm, or shall
hearken unto the precepts of men,
save their precepts shall be given
by the power of the Holy Ghost.
When the doctrines of man do not line up with the doctrines of God as defined in the scriptures, it boils down to who do you trust more. |
| QUESTION from:rudy bultmann, Other Religion, Age 25-34, wrote on 2/1/2001: | |
| If I am correct LDS theology states that God chose Jesus over Lucifer, who were both spirit children of God, to save the world because Jesus wanted to glorify the Father were as Lucifer wanted the glory for himself. It also states that we ourselves can progress to the level of God-hood. My question is then; When God-hood is reach will this be the process in which we chose a saviour? Will there be one that rebels and one that submits? One Saviour and One Satan? And if so will this process ever end? Will evil ever be completely conquered or will it forever be a vicious circle? It seems to me that your branch of Christianity does not answer the problem of evil and only prolongs it indefinitely. Thanks for your time. Sincerely Rudy | |
What you propose sounds like a
good theory to me, it makes sense
to me, even though it is not
explicitly defined anywhere in the
canon of scripture. President
Gordon B. Hinckley said recently
about this subject: "I don't know
that we teach it. I don't know
that we emphasize it ... I
understand the philosophical
background behind it, but I don't
know a lot about it, and I don't
think others know a lot about it."
(Time Magazine)To your question about the vicious circle of evil: solving the "problem" of evil is something that is not a problem to God. God is in control over the Universe, and suffers no threat from intelligences with an evil nature. He will always win in spite of arrogant and selfish intelligences yet to be born, who will seek His power and rebel against Him. The majority of the Universe and all the elements in it have chosen to obey God, and forever will. He is most definitely in control of it, for it is running like clockwork! When you "count" the trillions of stars, planets and numerous creations out there that are in control and order, and compare this to any that are in control by satan and his type, the score is a trillion to zero. God will keep "winning." We live today because of His designs. Evil is a necessary part of God's plan. If He was to eliminate all evil, there would be no opposition, yet we know from scripture the reason that opposition must exist. Lehi taught his son Jacob:
2 Nephi 2: 11 For it must needs
be, that there is an opposition in
all things. If not so, my first-
born in the wilderness,
righteousness could not be brought
to pass, neither wickedness,
neither holiness nor misery,
neither good nor bad. Wherefore,
all things must needs be a
compound in one; wherefore, if it
should be one body it must needs
remain as dead, having no life
neither death, nor corruption nor
incorruption, happiness nor
misery, neither sense nor
insensibility.
Knowing these things, it then must be some other goal of God to create all these earths and populate them with His spirit children. If the goal is not to eliminate all evil in the Universe (because even God can't/won't change the nature intelligence _against_ its will...He does not force), then what is God's goal and purpose in creating all these things? It is explained in the scriptures, this account to Moses, one of His prophets in ancient times:
Moses 1:36
And it came to pass that Moses
spake unto the Lord, saying: Be
merciful unto thy servant, O God,
and tell me concerning this earth,
and the inhabitants thereof, and
also the heavens, and then thy
servant will be content.
39 For behold, this is my work and
my glory-to bring to pass the
immortality and eternal life of
man.
|
| QUESTION from:Jeffery Brent Daniels Brown, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 2/12/2001: | |
| We had a discussion in my institute class about blessings on the food. My teacher told us that we don't need to ask for Heavenly Father to bless our food, because everything was created and blessed by Him already. He said we should thank Heavenly Father for the blessed food we have been given, but not to ask Him to bless it. This is kind of a weird question, but I have been very curious about what I should actually be saying, and my family is very skeptical about the idea. Thank you. | |
Jeffrey:I have always felt a little funny about asking Heavenly Father to bless my food, unless I thought there was something wrong with it. I have always felt within my heart to thank Him for my blessings, and for the blessing of having food to eat. Feeling thankful seems to be the most important part, and what the scriptures teach. Nowhere in the scriptures do we get the teaching that we should ask God to bless our food...being thankful is what we are taught to be, to have gratitude. "Please bless the food/refreshments" can often be a trite phrase that carries little sincerity, along the lines of "help us to go to our classes in safety," etc. Being thankful is one of the most important attitudes we can develop. As President Hinckley has recently said, Be Grateful. Nephi found food for his family, and rather than "bless the food" they humbled themselves and thanked the Lord for it:
1 Ne. 16: 32 And it came to pass
that I did return to our tents,
bearing the beasts which I had
slain; and now when they beheld
that I had obtained food, how
great was their joy! And it came
to pass that they did humble
themselves before the Lord, and
did give thanks unto him.
2 Ne. 9: 52 Behold, my beloved
brethren, remember the words of
your God; pray unto him
continually by day, and give
thanks unto his holy name by
night. Let your hearts rejoice.
Mosiah 18: 23 And [Alma] commanded
them that they should observe the
sabbath day, and keep it holy, and
also every day they should give
thanks to the Lord their God.
|
| QUESTION from:Brandi L. Walker, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 2/16/2001: | |
| I joined the Church about a year ago and I love the Church, it has brought so many blessings to my life. But I do have a question, a LDS friend told me that a man can be sealed to more that one women but a women can only be sealed to one man. She said that there were more women on this earth and to get to heaven they would have to do that. Is this true. Can you explain? | |
Brandi:The answer is that no, a woman does not "have" to do that to get into heaven. But if a woman or a man has any serious problem with the revealed will of God on this matter in ages past, that person must get their heart right towards God, and not be found counseling God. That there are more righteous women than men is intelligent speculation based on what can be seen in the church buildings across the world. Take a survey for yourself. Are there more single women in the congregation than single men? Not always, but generally speaking, yes there are. In the last days, this is only going to get worse (who knows, because of war? because of wickedness? gangs?). Nephi records the writings of Isaiah in his own writings, and shows how Isaiah prophesied of what would take place in the "last days" prior to the coming of Christ, concerning the matter of "polygamy:" 2 Ne. 14: 1 1 AND in that day, seven women shall take hold of one man, saying: We will eat our own bread, and wear our own apparel; only let us be called by thy name to take away our reproach. Read the rest of the prophecy here... Does a woman "have" to do this to get into heaven? From the scripture, it sounds like the majority of women will choose it, because they will understand it...but no, to come forth in the first resurrection, and enter into the Celestial Kingdom where God the Father dwells does not require this, but requires the following:
D&C 76:50 And again we bear record-
for we saw and heard, and this is
the testimony of the gospel of
Christ concerning them who shall
come forth in the resurrection of
the just-
51 They are they who received the
testimony of Jesus, and believed
on his name and were baptized
after the manner of his burial,
being buried in the water in his
name, and this according to the
commandment which he has given-
52 That by keeping the
commandments they might be washed
and cleansed from all their sins,
and receive the Holy Spirit by the
laying on of the hands of him who
is ordained and sealed unto this
power;
53 And who overcome by faith, and
are sealed by the Holy Spirit of
promise, which the Father sheds
forth upon all those who are just
and true.
54 They are they who are the
church of the Firstborn.
|
| QUESTION from:Brandi Walker, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 2/19/2001: | |
| Thank you for your quick response to my question on 2/16/01. I also want to thank you for this website it is very helpful. Especially since my family aren't members of the church. My mother got a hold of some Anti-Mormon literature and there are lots of questions that she has that I don't have answers for. She thinks Mormonism is a cult. Well I keep bearing my testimony to her and hopefully one day it will sink in. So peroidically I will e-mail you questions to help her. Well her question is.....is there a scripture in the Bible that says that we should pay 10 percent of our income? If there is not then how was this amount determined. | |
Alma taught Zeezrom and a great
multitude in 82 BC:Alma 13:15 And it was this same Melchizedek to whom Abraham paid tithes; yea, even our father Abraham paid tithes of one-tenth part of all he possessed. and Jesus Christ taught the Nephites the words He gave to Malachi: 3 Nephi 24:8 Will a man rob God? Yet ye have robbed me. But ye say: Wherein have we robbed thee? In tithes and offerings. 9 Ye are cursed with a curse, for ye have robbed me, even this whole nation. 10 Bring ye all the tithes into the storehouse, that there may be meat in my house; and prove me now herewith, saith the Lord of Hosts, if I will not open you the windows of heaven, and pour you out a blessing that there shall not be room enough to receive it. From the Topical Guide we have lots of scriptures that refer to this as well:
|
| QUESTION from:Joseph Abel, Catholic Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 2/21/2001: | |
| From your answer to my question:The Bible is not without error. It does not seem like a good exercise for me to point all of this out, I mainly want you to judge the Bible with the same judgement you have for the Book of Mormon, a book that went through a refining process in the publishing process, as did the Bible. Printers get the job done wrong at times. What refining process do you think the Bible went through that is similar to the publishing of the BoM? The Bible was written by a variety of men led by God. Seventy translated the OT into Greek and it was a good enough translation that Jesus used that translation every time he quoted the OT. How is this in any way similar to the BoM? This is really my point. I apply the same litmus tests to the BoM as I do to the Bible. When I do I am told "No, no, no. You are wrong. You're not reading that right." And so on. The BoM fails that tests much more often than the Bible. You state the Bible is not without error, but you say nothing to prove this statement to be correct. Now I know and accept that there are errors in science in the Bible. But I accept that the Bible is true in all that it affirms. On the other hand when an error is pointed out in the BoM, I am told I am wrong, even when I can cite the source of my information (i.e. King Benjamin in Ether 4). Just before my writing of this I looked at Mr. Carthew's letter (record 4166). He makes many valid points about logical thinking. Scientific thinking does not use logic and reasoning to prove something. It uses logic and reasoning to disprove something. When all the other explanations have been exhausted, then whatever you're left with must be the conclusion. This is logical thinking. It is quite logical to think that God has always existed. It is illogical to think that God had a beginning, particularly when God Himself says that He has no beginning and no end. I have read the BoM from cover to cover, even the parts that make Numbers sound exciting, eight separate times. I have prayed as to its truth. God has told me that it is not the truth. The truth lies in His Church, the Church Fathers, and the Traditions of the Church. I have prayed this with a sincere heart. I am more convinced than ever, particularly when I read the kind of brush off letter that you wrote to Mr. Carthew. I am also convinced that the practices of the LDS church do not match the BoM and that much is read into it to make the BoM fit what you want to believe. With the Bible we have manuscripts, artifacts, archeaology, outside sources of history, even the dreaded textual criticism. But every question I see that is not pro-Mormon is pooh-poohed as a "Well, if you'll just pray about it, God will show you the truth." That is illogical thinking. The BoM does not stand up under the same tests applied to it as applied to the Bible. What is the point of reading the BoM if, when a person reads it and finds something strange, odd or contradictory, they are simply brushed aside as not having the right faith, they are reading it wrong, or they aren't reading it in context, even when they are? | |
Joseph, you are a convinced man.
What more can we say,
except "uncle." You win.But I don't believe that you really are objective on this, by any stretch of the imagination. You have a love for and revere the Bible as the word of God, despite all of the imperfect men/scholars (ie non-prophets) that it came through, with things missing, etc. Have you never searched these things out? It is not my intent to rip apart the Bible on these things, in fact, I won't, but you should at least know that you are incorrect to imply that these things don't exist. Search and you will find. The Bible is not consistent from language to language. I taught the gospel in Korea for 2 years, and the Bible there (the only one available to us) read different meanings in certain passages, as we read what the men who translated it into Korea wrote, it came across much different. Some key points were actually missing!! I can say from my experience that the Bible is not consistent from language to language. Meanings get changed, sometimes by well-meaning scholars, and, I believe, sometimes with sinister and wicked intent. Is this the Lord's will? I don't think so. So what of it? Why not focus some of your energy on the Bible and all the "faults" that exist in the various and inconsistent translations, like the KJV, NIV, Good News, etc. etc. There are so many different "translations" of the Bible. Which one is correct? I can't tell from an intellectual exercise only. How can you? Again, I am suggesting that you convince yourself that the Bible is not a whole lot worse off on the very questions you pose about the Book of Mormon. If it is, and indeed it is, then there really seems to be no basis for your concerns about a printers error on King Benjamin, as it now stands. You speak of the "70" that translated the Bible in Jesus' time. I speak of the thousands of other versions which have since followed, and which are not consistent with each other. So many Bible translations and versions to choose from, in lots of different languages. The Book of Mormon has one valid and current version, the ONE published today, and all language translations overseen by prophets. Surely, it can be seen that these things can't |