The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)



The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
Questions 601-700 Main BOMA Index: Master Index of all BOMA questions/answers
QUESTION from:jtibbs, Other Religion, Age 18-24, wrote on 9/2/1999:
DO Mormons believe that eventhough someone doesn't have the athority of God, they still can use Sacred powers, such as priestcraft or withcraft? if so, is there a punishment for using witchcraft in thier life, or is it OK as long as they use discresion?
I would not call them sacred powers, but evil powers. Yes they are real. They are had in all ages, and the Book of Mormon records several occasions when these began to take hold on the people:

Mormon 1:18 And these Gadianton robbers, who were among the Lamanites, did infest the land, insomuch that the inhabitants thereof began to hide up their treasures in the earth; and they became slippery, because the Lord had cursed the land, that they could not hold them, nor retain them again.

19 And it came to pass that there were sorceries, and witchcrafts, and magics; and the power of the evil one was wrought upon all the face of the land, even unto the fulfilling of all the words of Abinadi, and also Samuel the Lamanite.

Sorcery has been a sinful evil in all ages. It was present in the courts of Pharaoh (Ex. 7:11) and Nebuchadnezzar. (Dan. 2:2.) Israel's prophets inveighed against it. (Isa. 47; 57:3; Jer. 27:9.) Apostate Nephites revelled in its mysteries. (Alma 1:32; Morm. 1:19.) Peter and John fought its evils in their ministries (Acts 8:9-11; 13:6-8), and its power is prevailing with great success over much of the earth today. (Rev. 9:20-21.) Indeed, by her power and sorceries, the great and abominable church has deceived all nations in the last days. (Rev. 18:23.)

(source: Mormon Doctrine, Sorcery)

It is not OK to practice witchcraft, and yes there is a punishment for being on Satan's team. Hell and the second resurrection will be the result.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Stephen NeSmith, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 9/2/1999:
In Seminary today, the question came up as to whether or not a person had to be baptized in order to enter spirit paradise. The class was pretty divided. Any help that you could give would be most helpful. Thanks
It is a good question. What do you think about it?

Jesus told the unbaptized thief on the cross:

Luke 23:43 And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise.

...and this He said to the man just before they all died and went to the Spirit World. So we see that this man went to paradise without baptism. Baptism is an ordinance that must be completed before one can enter into the Celestial Kingdom, and before their resurrection. So souls wait in the Spirit Paradise for baptisms to be done for them by proxy, in the temples of God...by a faithful mortal, a savior on Mount Zion. (see TPJS Section Four 1839-42 p.190)

The prophet Alma described the Spirit World as having two parts, a Prison and a Paradise.

Alma 40:11 Now, concerning the state of the soul between death and the resurrection--Behold, it has been made known unto me by an angel, that the spirits of all men, as soon as they are departed from this mortal body, yea, the spirits of all men, whether they be good or evil, are taken home to that God who gave them life.

12 And then shall it come to pass, that the spirits of those who are righteous are received into a state of happiness, which is called paradise, a state of rest, a state of peace, where they shall rest from all their troubles and from all care, and sorrow.

13 And then shall it come to pass, that the spirits of the wicked, yea, who are evil--for behold, they have no part nor portion of the Spirit of the Lord; for behold, they chose evil works rather than good; therefore the spirit of the devil did enter into them, and take possession of their house--and these shall be cast out into outer darkness; there shall be weeping, and wailing, and gnashing of teeth, and this because of their own iniquity, being led captive by the will of the devil.

14 Now this is the state of the souls of the wicked, yea, in darkness, and a state of awful, fearful looking for the fiery indignation of the wrath of God upon them; thus they remain in this state, as well as the righteous in paradise, until the time of their resurrection.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:David Morphis, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 9/3/1999:
I think I felt the Spirit but I'm not sure if it was THE "burning in the bosom". I'd like to know if this feeling should be recognizable at once and indeniable. If I'm doubting about that, doesn't it mean anyhow I have not really felt it? Thank you for your answer.
Yes, it is recognizable, but in the Book of Mormon we have an example of how the people did not recognize immediately something that was new to them. It was just after great destructions and before the Savior descended from heaven down to the Nephites, and the Holy Ghost was communicating who was coming, but they didn't get it until the third message:

3 Nephi 11:2 And [the Nephites] were also conversing about this Jesus Christ, of whom the sign had been given concerning his death.

3 And it came to pass that while they were thus conversing one with another, they heard a voice as if it came out of heaven; and they cast their eyes round about, for they understood not the voice which they heard; and it was not a harsh voice, neither was it a loud voice; nevertheless, and notwithstanding it being a small voice it did pierce them that did hear to the center, insomuch that there was no part of their frame that it did not cause to quake; yea, it did pierce them to the very soul, and did cause their hearts to burn.

4 And it came to pass that again they heard the voice, and they understood it not.

5 And again the third time they did hear the voice, and did open their ears to hear it; and their eyes were towards the sound thereof; and they did look steadfastly towards heaven, from whence the sound came.

6 And behold, the third time they did understand the voice which they heard; and it said unto them:

7 Behold my Beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased, in whom I have glorified my name--hear ye him.

8 And it came to pass, as they understood they cast their eyes up again towards heaven; and behold, they saw a Man descending out of heaven; and he was clothed in a white robe; and he came down and stood in the midst of them; and the eyes of the whole multitude were turned upon him, and they durst not open their mouths, even one to another, and wist not what it meant, for they thought it was an angel that had appeared unto them.

9 And it came to pass that he stretched forth his hand and spake unto the people, saying:

10 Behold, I am Jesus Christ, whom the prophets testified shall come into the world.

11 And behold, I am the light and the life of the world; and I have drunk out of that bitter cup which the Father hath given me, and have glorified the Father in taking upon me the sins of the world, in the which I have suffered the will of the Father in all things from the beginning.

12 And it came to pass that when Jesus had spoken these words the whole multitude fell to the earth; for they remembered that it had been prophesied among them that Christ should show himself unto them after his ascension into heaven.

You can get a revelation and still doubt, you just have to work at not doubting. Be faithful and you will know. Laman and Lemuel saw an angel and still doubted their cause to get the plates of brass. We can get a witness, but if we don't exercise faith, then doubts can creep in. Just believe like a little child would do.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Erin Karges, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 9/3/1999:
I was wondering, do you know if marriage ceremonies can be preformed in the church building or if the church frowns on this? I know that temple marriage is strongly encouraged, but my fiancé's family is non-members and we feel that they would be extremely hurt if we were to be married without them. We do plan on going to the temple on our first anniversary, any help or advice you could give us would be greatly appreciated. Thank you
Erin:

You can ask your Bishop, but my advice would be to marry in the temple, not for the purpose of hurting anyone, but for the purpose of being most respectful to God's ordinances. God comes first, not family, according to the teachings of Jesus Christ. He said:

Matthew 10:36 And a man's foes [shall be] they of his own household.

37 He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.

38 And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me.

If you can go now, then do it, because you do not know what the future holds... your opportunities are now. A temple marriage is stronger than a civil marriage, the covenants are more, it is for eternity.

Matthew 19:29 And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life.

The purpose of these scriptures is to teach us who comes first. You would please your earthly parents and that is good, but it is our Heavenly Parents who must come first in our obedience to the commandments. We are their children.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:ricardo ascencion, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/5/1999:
I need to know what can officialy be considered as doctrine besides the standard works, I know JESUS THE CHRIST is used by the missionaries and THE MIRACLE OF FORGIVENESS is recomended by bishoprics after a diciplinary action, but there are some many more books, conferences and materials that we may be taking as pure church doctrine.
The Apostle Bruce McConkie taught:

Gospel doctrine is synonymous with the truths of salvation. It comprises the tenets, teachings, and true theories found in the scriptures; it includes the principles, precepts, and revealed philosophies of pure religion; prophetic dogmas, maxims, and views are embraced within its folds; the Articles of Faith are part and portion of it, as is every inspired utterance of the Lord's agents.
(source: Mormon Doctrine)

So, anything that is truth can be doctrine. This is why we must rely on the power of the Holy Ghost to know what is true. If the living prophet teaches us "new" doctrine, how shall we know of its truth or error unless the Holy Ghost teaches us? We must rely on the Holy Ghost to let us know.

Moroni 10:5 And by the power of the Holy Ghost ye may know the truth of all things.

Moroni 10:4 And when ye shall receive these things, I would exhort you that ye would ask God, the Eternal Father, in the name of Christ, if these things are not true; and if ye shall ask with a sincere heart, with real intent, having faith in Christ, he will manifest the truth of it unto you, by the power of the Holy Ghost.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Scott Carthew, Catholic Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/5/1999:
...I know that if people really understood the truth about the Catholic church we wouldn't have so many Churches. I do believe that many Mormons are sincere christians, and that the Catholics could probably learn a few things from Mormons. But, I also believe that the Catholic church is perfect in it's teachings and doctrines and I just wish people would take the time to study (all of them) and think about them (Catholics included). So that's where I'm coming from. Your brother in Christ--scott
Scott:

I think we can all learn a lot of things from each other. There is good in all churches. But there is a fulness, and there are some false doctrines in the world today. I would use the Book of Mormon prophets to illustrate truth and error. You may be aware of some of the ancient American prophetical teachings pertaining to some of the things that have also crept into the Catholic Church. Case in point: the baptism of little children. Around 400 AD the prophet Mormon taught his prophet son Moroni:

Moroni 8:5 For, if I have learned the truth, there have been disputations among you concerning the baptism of your little children.

6 And now, my son, I desire that ye should labor diligently, that this gross error should be removed from among you; for, for this intent I have written this epistle.

7 For immediately after I had learned these things of you I inquired of the Lord concerning the matter. And the word of the Lord came to me by the power of the Holy Ghost, saying:

8 Listen to the words of Christ, your Redeemer, your Lord and your God. Behold, I came into the world not to call the righteous but sinners to repentance; the whole need no physician, but they that are sick; wherefore, little children are whole, for they are not capable of committing sin; wherefore the curse of Adam is taken from them in me, that it hath no power over them; and the law of circumcision is done away in me.

9 And after this manner did the Holy Ghost manifest the word of God unto me; wherefore, my beloved son, I know that it is solemn mockery before God, that ye should baptize little children.

10 Behold I say unto you that this thing shall ye teach-- repentance and baptism unto those who are accountable and capable of committing sin; yea, teach parents that they must repent and be baptized, and humble themselves as their little children, and they shall all be saved with their little children.

11 And their little children need no repentance, neither baptism. Behold, baptism is unto repentance to the fulfilling the commandments unto the remission of sins.

12 But little children are alive in Christ, even from the foundation of the world; if not so, God is a partial God, and also a changeable God, and a respecter to persons; for how many little children have died without baptism!

13 Wherefore, if little children could not be saved without baptism, these must have gone to an endless hell.

14 Behold I say unto you, that he that supposeth that little children need baptism is in the gall of bitterness and in the bonds of iniquity, for he hath neither faith, hope, nor charity; wherefore, should he be cut off while in the thought, he must go down to hell.

15 For awful is the wickedness to suppose that God saveth one child because of baptism, and the other must perish because he hath no baptism.

The Lord sets clear through His prophets in the Book of Mormon that little children are alive in Christ, they are pure, they are already whole, and there is no need to baptize them. Baptism is unto repentance. If the Catholic Church is teaching and practicing this doctrine of baptism for little children, how can it be perfect?


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Kevin Murphy, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 9/5/1999:
What textual changes to the BoM have been made over the years in the various editions?
The printed versions of the Book of Mormon derive from two manuscripts. The first, called the original manuscript (O), was written by at least three scribes as Joseph Smith translated and dictated. The most important scribe was Oliver Cowdery. This manuscript was begun no later than April 1829 and finished in June 1829.

A copy of the original was then made by Oliver Cowdery and two other scribes. This copy is called the printer's manuscript (P), since it was the one normally used to set the type for the first (1830) edition of the Book of Mormon. It was begun in July 1829 and finished early in 1830.

The printer's manuscript is not an exact copy of the original manuscript. There are on the average three changes per original manuscript page. These changes appear to be natural scribal errors; there is little or no evidence of conscious editing. Most of the changes are minor, and about one in five produca a discernible difference in meaning. Because they were all relatively minor, most of the errors thus introduced into the text have remained in the printed editions of the Book of Mormon and have not been detected and corrected except by reference to the original manuscript. About twenty of these errors were corrected in the 1981 edition.

The compositor for the 1830 edition added punctuation, paragraphing, and other printing marks to about one-third of the pages of the printer's manuscript. These same marks appear on one fragment of the original, indicating that it was used at least once in typesetting the 1830 edition.

In preparation for the second (1837) edition, hundreds of grammatical changes and a few textual emendations were made in P. After the publication of this edition, P was retained by Oliver Cowdery. After his death in 1850, his brother-in-law, David Whitmer, kept P until his death in 1888. In 1903 Whitmer's grandson sold P to the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which owns it today. It is wholly extant except for two lines at the bottom of the first leaf.

The original manuscript was not consulted for the editing of the 1837 edition. However, in producing the 1840 edition, Joseph Smith used O to restore some of its original readings. In October 1841, Joseph Smith placed O in the cornerstone of the Nauvoo House. Over forty years later, Lewis Bidamon, Emma Smith's second husband, opened the cornerstone and found that water seepage had destroyed most of O. The surviving pages were handed out to various individuals during the 1880s.

(source:Encyclopedia of Mormonism, Vol.1, BOOK OF MORMON MANUSCRIPTS)


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:David Morphis, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 9/6/1999:
I'd like to ask you whether "The Septuagin" and "The Vulgate" are reliable. Actually, I've learned classical Greek and Latin; I just wanted to know if they were more accurate than the KJV. By the way, could you tell me what the base was for that English translation? Thank you.
Well, they contain Apocryphal writings, which Joseph Smith was told by the Lord are not necessarily reliable. They contain many things which are not true.

There has been controversy concerning the value of the Apocrypha. In 1833, while engaged in revising the King James version by the spirit of revelation, the Prophet Joseph Smith inquired of the Lord as to the authenticity of the Apocrypha. The books of the Apocrypha were inspired writings in the first instance, but subsequent interpolations/changes had perverted and twisted their original contexts.

D&C 91:1 Verily, thus saith the Lord unto you concerning the Apocrypha--There are many things contained therein that are true, and it is mostly translated correctly;

2 There are many things contained therein that are not true, which are interpolations by the hands of men.

3 Verily, I say unto you, that it is not needful that the Apocrypha should be translated.

4 Therefore, whoso readeth it, let him understand, for the Spirit manifesteth truth;

5 And whoso is enlightened by the Spirit shall obtain benefit therefrom;

6 And whoso receiveth not by the Spirit, cannot be benefited. Therefore it is not needful that it should be translated. Amen.

The Book of Mormon is a very unique work of the Lord. It was specially prepared by one great prophet, even Mormon, as an abridgement of hundreds of prophetical records from a 1000 year period of ancient America. It was prepared specifically for our day, for this people and for the world. It was preserved in its purity, and it came forth pure as well. Today is stands as the most correct book. Joseph Smith said:

I told the brethren that the Book of Mormon was the most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our religion, and a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts, than by any other book. (November 28, 1841.)


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Wade, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/7/1999:
In Moroni 8:18 it talks about God being "unchangeable from all eternity to all eternity." Apparently this is suppose to contradict the church in that it is LDS belief that God was once mortal. How should us christians respond to this when asked by our baptist friends?
Moroni 8:18 For I know that God is not a partial God, neither a changeable being; but he is unchangeable from all eternity to all eternity.

To me this is talking about the personality of God, not His physical being. He doesn't respect people in a partial way, and He can be counted on as a constant in His perfection. He will always be true to his word. He doesn't change His colors, so to speak. He is a constant for us.

Now we know that Jesus Christ came to this earth. That was a physical change. So we know that this is not what the scripture means. It can not be talking about His physical being, but rather His nature as God. That has and always will be a constant, from all eternity to eternity.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Sam Newton, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 9/7/1999:
What is the position of the Church on Capital Punishment?
Articles of Faith 12

12 We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law.

In the Book of Mormon days, capital punishment was in place. In fact the "socialists" of that time, or "King Men" were put to death under certain circumstances:

Alma 62:9 And the men of Pachus received their trial, according to the law, and also those king-men who had been taken and cast into prison; and they were executed according to the law; yea, those men of Pachus and those king-men, whosoever would not take up arms in the defence of their country, but would fight against it, were put to death.

10 And thus it became expedient that this law should be strictly observed for the safety of their country; yea, and whosoever was found denying their freedom was speedily executed according to the law.

Let us hope that in our day, we can maintain the safety of our country, even while there are those among us who seek to destroy the Constitution of the Land, and implement other means of gaining power, because of their secret combinations. Moroni taught US:

Ether 8:24 Wherefore, the Lord commandeth you, when ye shall see these things come among you that ye shall awake to a sense of your awful situation, because of this secret combination which shall be among you; or wo be unto it, because of the blood of them who have been slain; for they cry from the dust for vengeance upon it, and also upon those who built it up.

25 For it cometh to pass that whoso buildeth it up seeketh to overthrow the freedom of all lands, nations, and countries; and it bringeth to pass the destruction of all people, for it is built up by the devil, who is the father of all lies; even that same liar who beguiled our first parents, yea, even that same liar who hath caused man to commit murder from the beginning; who hath hardened the hearts of men that they have murdered the prophets, and stoned them, and cast them out from the beginning.

26 Wherefore, I, Moroni, am commanded to write these things that evil may be done away, and that the time may come that Satan may have no power upon the hearts of the children of men, but that they may be persuaded to do good continually, that they may come unto the fountain of all righteousness and be saved.

And so this is our charge, to see that these things are done away, and then comes the second coming of Christ, when evil will be done away.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Steve, Protestant Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/7/1999:
Mormons believe that there is a godhead governed by three completely separate entities - The Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Explain that: Jesus is the Father and the Son. I don't mean this to be an antagonistic question, I just got done reading something on the Godhead, but am confused on this other point.
You mention that Jesus is the Father and the Son. This is taught in the Book of Mormon, but Jesus is not the Holy Ghost. What about the Holy Ghost? If He is separate from Jesus Christ, then why not all three separate beings? They are. Yet they are one God. The mystery is in the meaning of the word "one" and it means one in purpose, perfectly united in cause.

Here is how Jesus is the Father and the Son, as taught in the Book of Mormon by the prophet Abinadi:

Mosiah 15:1 AND now Abinadi said unto them: I would that ye should understand that God himself shall come down among the children of men, and shall redeem his people.

2 And because he dwelleth in flesh he shall be called the Son of God, and having subjected the flesh to the will of the Father, being the Father and the Son--

3 The Father, because he was conceived by the power of God; and the Son, because of the flesh; thus becoming the Father and Son--

4 And they are one God, yea, the very Eternal Father of heaven and of earth.

5 And thus the flesh becoming subject to the Spirit, or the Son to the Father, being one God, suffereth temptation, and yieldeth not to the temptation, but suffereth himself to be mocked, and scourged, and cast out, and disowned by his people.

6 And after all this, after working many mighty miracles among the children of men, he shall be led, yea, even as Isaiah said, as a sheep before the shearer is dumb, so he opened not his mouth.

7 Yea, even so he shall be led, crucified, and slain, the flesh becoming subject even unto death, the will of the Son being swallowed up in the will of the Father.

8 And thus God breaketh the bands of death, having gained the victory over death; giving the Son power to make intercession for the children of men--

9 Having ascended into heaven, having the bowels of mercy; being filled with compassion towards the children of men; standing betwixt them and justice; having broken the bands of death, taken upon himself their iniquity and their transgressions, having redeemed them, and satisfied the demands of justice.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Dan Beall, Non-Denominational Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 9/7/1999:
Is there any archaeological or historical proof for the Book of Mormon? Why are animals like horses and cattle mentioned in the Book of Mormon? It is a known fact that these animals were not present in the Americas until the 16th century. What about the origin of the American Indians? Isn't it true that they are of Asian origin and not Hebrew? Sincerely, Dan Beall
It is a known _theory_ that they were not here. But to state it as a fact, when it is merely the conclusions of people lacking evidences, is not correct.

We have many theories of men which have yet to be proven false, but they are yet theories. They may be true, they may be false, but we use our faith to either believe or disbelieve them.

Now my faith tells me that the Book of Mormon is true. There were horses here, and cattle, and Nephi, and Lehi, and Jesus Christ did walk this land too! The book is miraculous, and God tells us it is true if we read it and ask Him in the name of Christ. That is our evidence.

Enos 1:15 Wherefore, I knowing that the Lord God was able to preserve our records, I cried unto him continually, for he had said unto me: Whatsoever thing ye shall ask in faith, believing that ye shall receive in the name of Christ, ye shall receive it.

This Book of Mormon record WAS preserved by the power of God, and it did come forth in our day, and it is going forth to the Lamanites as well. To find out if this record is true, and the theories of man are therefore false, all one needs to do is put God to the test:

Mormon 9:21 Behold, I say unto you that whoso believeth in Christ, doubting nothing, whatsoever he shall ask the Father in the name of Christ it shall be granted him; and this promise is unto all, even unto the ends of the earth.

Moroni 10:4 And when ye shall receive these things, I would exhort you that ye would ask God, the Eternal Father, in the name of Christ, if these things are not true; and if ye shall ask with a sincere heart, with real intent, having faith in Christ, he will manifest the truth of it unto you, by the power of the Holy Ghost.

5 And by the power of the Holy Ghost ye may know the truth of all things.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Linda Fleming, Born Again Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 9/8/1999:
Hi. I have a question about the priesthood. It has always been a mystery to me. When I read about it in the Bible its function sounds totally different than what I understand it to mean in the LDS church. Could you clarify it for me. e.g. in Hebrews 5 it lists the duties of a priest and in Hebrews 7:24 it says that the priesthood of Jesus is unchangeable or in the Greek untransmittable meaning it cannot be passed from one person to another. LINDA
That particular scripture is speaking specifically about Jesus Christ. I would not imagine that this high and holy Priesthood calling that Jesus had/has could be passed to another. It was only He who could accomplish his mission. He was endowed with special Godly powers from God His Father, and could tread the wine press alone, and be victorious over death and hell.

Mosiah 15:7 Yea, even so [Christ] shall be led, crucified, and slain, the flesh becoming subject even unto death, the will of the Son being swallowed up in the will of the Father.

8 And thus God breaketh the bands of death, having gained the victory over death; giving the Son power to make intercession for the children of men--

D&C 88:106 And again, another angel shall sound his trump, which is the seventh angel, saying: It is finished; it is finished! The Lamb of God hath overcome and trodden the wine-press alone, even the wine-press of the fierceness of the wrath of Almighty God. (see also Revelation 16:17)

Now as pertaining to the rest of us, Jesus has commissioned Apostles with Priesthood to take the gospel to all the world.

Mark 16:15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.

16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

Thus we see that belief and baptism are both necessary to be saved. Faith and works. Faith without works is dead. The Priesthood, which those Apostles held, was passed on to them from Jesus Christ, by the laying on of hands (see 1 Timothy 4:14). He commissioned them to do His work.

Paul was trying to teach (in Hebrews) the deadness of the Law of Moses which was fulfilled in Christ. He was not trying to teach the deadness of the Priesthood to us, only in the older ordinances of the Levitical Priesthood which were fulfilled in Christ. Certainly there were Jews in that day who had trouble accepting these monumental changes in doctrine and practice!

But the Melchizedek Priesthood continued. Peter taught in later years:

1 Peter 2:9 But ye [are] a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light.

also

Ephesians 4:11 And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers;

12 For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ:

13 Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ:

14 That we [henceforth] be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, [and] cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;

Jesus passed it on! His Priesthood is forever, and He is still working through weak man to preach His word, and these servants must hold His Priesthood authority to do this work. It continues even through our day and will continue forever.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Bob, Born Again Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/10/1999:
How does the LDS explian the contradition in the Book of Mormon about being "Saved"? It says in the b of m when jesus appered to the "nephites" he told them you must believe in him and be baptized to be saved The Bible teaches we need to believe in him only!! and we are saved How do you you explian this matter? Thanks for your time
That is what many churches teach today, but it is not what that Bible teaches. When I read the Bible, I see that even Jesus Christ Himself was baptized to fulfill all righteousness. Yet we have preachers going about today stating that we do not need to be baptized, but it is an outward expression. This may be their opinion, but it is better to follow the example of Jesus Christ and not question what we must do. The truly repentant in the New Testament submitted to baptism.

One of the greatest prophets who ever lived, Nephi, taught us what God taught him: how important it is to follow the example of the Savior and be baptized after true repentance:

2 Nephi 31:11 And the Father said: Repent ye, repent ye, and be baptized in the name of my Beloved Son.

12 And also, the voice of the Son came unto me, saying: He that is baptized in my name, to him will the Father give the Holy Ghost, like unto me; wherefore, follow me, and do the things which ye have seen me do.

13 Wherefore, my beloved brethren, I know that if ye shall follow the Son, with full purpose of heart, acting no hypocrisy and no deception before God, but with real intent, repenting of your sins, witnessing unto the Father that ye are willing to take upon you the name of Christ, by baptism--yea, by following your Lord and your Savior down into the water, according to his word, behold, then shall ye receive the Holy Ghost; yea, then cometh the baptism of fire and of the Holy Ghost; and then can ye speak with the tongue of angels, and shout praises unto the Holy One of Israel.

14 But, behold, my beloved brethren, thus came the voice of the Son unto me, saying: After ye have repented of your sins, and witnessed unto the Father that ye are willing to keep my commandments, by the baptism of water, and have received the baptism of fire and of the Holy Ghost, and can speak with a new tongue, yea, even with the tongue of angels, and after this should deny me, it would have been better for you that ye had not known me.

15 And I heard a voice from the Father, saying: Yea, the words of my Beloved are true and faithful. He that endureth to the end, the same shall be saved.

16 And now, my beloved brethren, I know by this that unless a man shall endure to the end, in following the example of the Son of the living God, he cannot be saved.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Brad, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 9/11/1999:
I have a couple of questions stemming from my reading of the 9th chapter of 2 Nephi.
The author says that "where there is no law given there is no punishment... for the atonement satisfieth the demands of his justice upon those who have not the law given unto them".
What does it mean to have the law "given" unto you? Often in the scriptures it seems to refer to those who heard so-and-so preaching and disregarded his/her advice as wicked. Were they "given" the law even if they were given no reason to adhere to it, having never sought and recieved a witness from the spirit?
I understand that sinning against the holy ghost, or having made and then knowingly broken a baptismal covenant, is a transgression of God's law (where much is given, much is expected and so on) but what about transgressing laws that, at least in this world, one never studied seriously enough to covenant to keep? We are constantly in transgression of someone's interperetation of God's law and without a witness from the spirit one has no reason to treat our version any differently than anyone else's.
So I guess the short version of my question is "Are my nonmember friends going to suffer for transgressions that they made against a law they did not know was God-given?"
I guess it is obvious from the phrasing of my question what I would like the answer to it to be but I am more interested in the Truth than what is easiest for me to accept. Whatever your answer, I do not want opinions. I would be interested in scriptural references and/or quotes from the Presidency as I have been unable to find any that really clarify this so far.

Thanks very much in advance. This will mean a lot to me.
--Brad
It is about accountability based on how much light and truth has been revealed. Here is the scripture:

2 Nephi 9:23 And he commandeth all men that they must repent, and be baptized in his name, having perfect faith in the Holy One of Israel, or they cannot be saved in the kingdom of God.

24 And if they will not repent and believe in his name, and be baptized in his name, and endure to the end, they must be damned; for the Lord God, the Holy One of Israel, has spoken it.

25 Wherefore, he has given a law; and where there is no law given there is no punishment; and where there is no punishment there is no condemnation; and where there is no condemnation the mercies of the Holy One of Israel have claim upon them, because of the atonement; for they are delivered by the power of him.

26 For the atonement satisfieth the demands of his justice upon all those who have not the law given to them, that they are delivered from that awful monster, death and hell, and the devil, and the lake of fire and brimstone, which is endless torment; and they are restored to that God who gave them breath, which is the Holy One of Israel.

27 But wo unto him that has the law given, yea, that has all the commandments of God, like unto us, and that transgresseth them, and that wasteth the days of his probation, for awful is his state!

People are responsibile and accountable for what they hear, no matter who the messenger. We should not be a respecter of persons, because God isn't (Acts 10:34)

The spirit of Christ is given to all people that they may know good from evil. If they ignore this spirit of Christ, the Holy Ghost, they will be held accountable.

The prophet Moroni wrote:

Moroni 7:16 For behold, the Spirit of Christ is given to every man, that he may know good from evil; wherefore, I show unto you the way to judge; for every thing which inviteth to do good, and to persuade to believe in Christ, is sent forth by the power and gift of Christ; wherefore ye may know with a perfect knowledge it is of God.

17 But whatsoever thing persuadeth men to do evil, and believe not in Christ, and deny him, and serve not God, then ye may know with a perfect knowledge it is of the devil; for after this manner doth the devil work, for he persuadeth no man to do good, no, not one; neither do his angels; neither do they who subject themselves unto him.

18 And now, my brethren, seeing that ye know the light by which ye may judge, which light is the light of Christ, see that ye do not judge wrongfully; for with that same judgment which ye judge ye shall also be judged.

and King Benjamin spoke:

Mosiah 3:19 For the natural man is an enemy to God, and has been from the fall of Adam, and will be, forever and ever, unless he yields to the enticings of the Holy Spirit, and putteth off the natural man and becometh a saint through the atonement of Christ the Lord, and becometh as a child, submissive, meek, humble, patient, full of love, willing to submit to all things which the Lord seeth fit to inflict upon him, even as a child doth submit to his father.

Studying seriously enough or not is a choice we make. If we wrest the scriptures, that is a choice too, for which we will be held acountable.

2 Peter 3:16 ...they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as [they do] also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.

The scriptures make it plain that obedience to the Spirit of God is something that all people will be held accountable for. God gave the word, even if through a weak vessel, and it stands.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:A.J. VAN DINE, Non-Denominational Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/11/1999:
From my understanding the LDS church is the restored true church of Christ, that was in need of restoration due to a complete apostosy which resulted in the removal of the priest hood from the earth. My question is if the BOM is to be believed then how could this apostosy have taken place? because 3 Nephi 28:7-9 says "Therefore, more blessed are ye,for ye shall live to behold all the doings of the FATHER unto the children of men, even until all things shall be fulfilled according to the will of the Father, when I shall come in my glory with the powers of heaven. And ye shall never endure the pains of death; but when I shall come in my glory ye shall be changed in the twinkling of an eye from mortality to immortality; and then shall ye be blessed in the kingdom of my Father. And again,ye shall not have pain while ye dwell in the flesh, niether sorrow save it be for the sins of the world; and all this will I do because of the thing ye have desired of me, for ye have desired that ye might bring the souls of men unto me, while the world shall stand." As I said earlier I don't understand how there was a need for restoration. If these three men had the fullness of the Gospel and were promised by Christ himself that they would live until He came in His glory, to bring Him the souls of men, how could there be a complete apostosy? And again if the BOM is the most correct book on earth how is it that it seemingly contradicts the very foundation that the LDS church is based on?
The three Nephites who were translated or transformed into an immortal state, are not in the same category as mankind in general! They are as the angels. There have always been angels in the world, waiting to communicate with righteous individuals, but that does not necessarily a Church make.

Since God's Church is for mankind (sinners), not for the inhabitants of heaven or those who have already passed their test, then the three Nephites were not part of a Church. They were as angels.

3 Nephi 28:30 And [the three Nephites] are as the angels of God, and if they shall pray unto the Father in the name of Jesus they can show themselves unto whatsoever man it seemeth them good.

They have the job of angels. It is different. Angels minister to mankind, but that does not necessarily mean that there is a Church or authority among mankind (priesthood). When God calls a prophet either directly or through an angel, they may be getting a message that will come to fruition in later years. Case in point: Moses, Joseph Smith, etc. Each waited for many years after their initial communications with God before any Church was established, or when priesthood was received.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Mark, Non-Denominational Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 9/12/1999:
Hello. I was going through some webpages about LDS beliefs on the Bible, and some comments about "Other inspired writings" that are now lost caught my eye. I've allways been interested in biblical apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha. I was wondering if the LDS church has in the past, or plans to go through and do a major study on all currently known works under these catagories and attempt to assemble a collection of works that might have also been inspired. Perhaps works that have been long neglected by churches who keep to a strict closed canon might actuly shed ned light on some topics. Just a general curiosity. Mark
I don't know if any studies are forthcoming, but I do know that the Book of Mormon most definitely qualifies for your curiosity. It is most definitely additional writings of prophets not contained in our present day Bible, but even more. The Book of Mormon was prepared by a prophet (Mormon) who took small portions of the writings of other prophets over a 1,000 year time period, and condensed or abridged the records. It was created specifically for OUR day. I hope that you can read it.

The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:David Bradly Christensen, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 9/13/1999:
I need help. I am trying to teach a muslim about my religion. it is very hard because i need to convert him to christianity first. do you have any suggestions for me.
The Book of Mormon contains an account of Ammon, and his brethren, who went among the Lamanites to try and be the means by which salvation in Christ could come to a few of them. Thousands were converted. Thousands of people who never believed in Jesus Christ and who were wicked and delighted in bloodshed, etc.

The question is, HOW did Ammon accomplish this...

His brothers went up and began to teach the word, and they were promptly locked up in prison and tortured with hunger and nakedness. Ammon, on the other hand, desired to be a servant of the King Lamoni, and he waited patiently for the right opportunity. When it was right, he shared the word.

We can learn from this. Service to others softens hearts, creates opportunities, and provides chances for these people to "see your light" that it may shine on a hill and not be hid.

"Let your light so shine that others may see your good works and glorify your Father which is in heaven."

Setting the right example, patience, and always looking for that opportunity by following the Spirit. The Lord knows these people, He knows all people. He will inspire you with what to do and when to do it. Service is the key in this case.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Marinda Geter, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/13/1999:
I have a question of race in the book of 2 Nephi 5:21-23 there is a reference to race and skinned turned black as flint and the seed being cursed if mixed what race are they talking of? and show me in the Bible where this holds up to doctrine. I Joseph Smith had to first search the scriptures of the Bible to find truth where is it listed in there.
2 Nephi 5:20 Wherefore, the word of the Lord was fulfilled which he spake unto me, saying that: Inasmuch as they will not hearken unto thy words they shall be cut off from the presence of the Lord. And behold, they were cut off from his presence.

21 And he had caused the cursing to come upon them, yea, even a sore cursing, because of their iniquity. For behold, they had hardened their hearts against him, that they had become like unto a flint; wherefore, as they were white, and exceedingly fair and delightsome, that they might not be enticing unto my people the Lord God did cause a skin of blackness to come upon them.

22 And thus saith the Lord God: I will cause that they shall be loathsome unto thy people, save they shall repent of their iniquities.

This is not the first time the Lord has changed skin colors, in the Book of Mormon. It took place a long time ago in the Old Testament as well.

As we know from the record, our first parents of the human race were Adam and Eve. What race were they? Nobody knows. But this much we do know, our children who are born to us look like we do. How then did there come to be so many races and languages on this earth?

If God can make the changes that He did at the Tower of Babel, even to the extent of changing languages, then why would we deny that He could make a change to small group of the families of the wicked brothers of Nephi, and call them Lamanites? He did make the change, but it was for the purpose of separating the people of God from those that hated God.

The way that I look at the issue of "race" is to understand and know that we are all of the same race, even that of the children of God. We are His offspring literally, and we have God the Father as our Father. He is the Father of our spirits. So, we are all of the same family and "race" as a result of the Pre-mortal existence, where we previously lived with God the Father. But this is another topic, even one about the Plan of Salvation.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:janice peacock, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 50+, wrote on 9/13/1999:
can you tell me what it means to be santified, i hear that we must become sanctified. thanks for your help
Moroni 10:32 Yea, come unto Christ, and be perfected in him, and deny yourselves of all ungodliness; and if ye shall deny yourselves of all ungodliness and love God with all your might, mind and strength, then is his grace sufficient for you, that by his grace ye may be perfect in Christ; and if by the grace of God ye are perfect in Christ, ye can in nowise deny the power of God.

33 And again, if ye by the grace of God are perfect in Christ, and deny not his power, then are ye sanctified in Christ by the grace of God, through the shedding of the blood of Christ, which is in the covenant of the Father unto the remission of your sins, that ye become holy, without spot.

Sanctification is the process of becoming a saint, holy and spiritually clean and pure, by purging all sin from the soul.

The power of the Holy Ghost purifies the heart and gives an abhorrence of sin:

Alma 13:12 Now they, after being sanctified by the Holy Ghost, having their garments made white, being pure and spotless before God, could not look upon sin save it were with abhorrence; and there were many, exceedingly great many, who were made pure and entered into the rest of the Lord their God.

King Benjamin's people in the Book of Mormon illustrate the sanctification process. They humbled themselves and prayed mightily that God would apply the atoning blood of Christ and purify their hearts. The Spirit came upon them and filled them with joy; a mighty change came into their hearts and they had "no more disposition to do evil, but to do good continually".

Mosiah 5:1 AND now, it came to pass that when king Benjamin had thus spoken to his people, he sent among them, desiring to know of his people if they believed the words which he had spoken unto them.

2 And they all cried with one voice, saying: Yea, we believe all the words which thou hast spoken unto us; and also, we know of their surety and truth, because of the Spirit of the Lord Omnipotent, which has wrought a mighty change in us, or in our hearts, that we have no more disposition to do evil, but to do good continually.

3 And we, ourselves, also, through the infinite goodness of God, and the manifestations of his Spirit, have great views of that which is to come; and were it expedient, we could prophesy of all things.

4 And it is the faith which we have had on the things which our king has spoken unto us that has brought us to this great knowledge, whereby we do rejoice with such exceedingly great joy.

5 And we are willing to enter into a covenant with our God to do his will, and to be obedient to his commandments in all things that he shall command us, all the remainder of our days, that we may not bring upon ourselves a never- ending torment, as has been spoken by the angel, that we may not drink out of the cup of the wrath of God.

6 And now, these are the words which king Benjamin desired of them; and therefore he said unto them: Ye have spoken the words that I desired; and the covenant which ye have made is a righteous covenant.

7 And now, because of the covenant which ye have made ye shall be called the children of Christ, his sons, and his daughters; for behold, this day he hath spiritually begotten you; for ye say that your hearts are changed through faith on his name; therefore, ye are born of him and have become his sons and his daughters.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Gary Mercer, Baptist Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 9/13/1999:
Do you think more people will go to heaven or to hell? I have always been taught most people will turn from God and will not be saved. I have a little problem with this if you think in the secular aspects of "score". I may be way off base, but if Satan is able to sway more people to his evil ways and thus condemnation to hell, than didn't he in fact win over good. If more people end up in hell than heaven, than I see that Satan wins the war here on this earth. I apologize for the use of this analogy. I have no intention of blasmphemy. Thank you in advance for your answer.
Well, if "winning" means to burn in hell foever, who wants to "win?" Truly Satan has lost already because he was cast out. He is not in control over the Plan of Salvation, God is, and He can stop Satan whenever he pleases, or rather, whenever His people choose to ignore the devil. It is to the advantage of the Plan of Salvation to have opposition in all things, that way the people can have a choice to choose between good and evil. Satan is a willing participant, even though he has not hope of gaining anything except comisery. Lehi taught:

2 Nephi 2:11 For it must needs be, that there is an opposition in all things. If not so ... righteousness could not be brought to pass, neither wickedness, neither holiness nor misery, neither good nor bad. Wherefore, all things must needs be a compound in one; wherefore, if it should be one body it must needs remain as dead, having no life neither death, nor corruption nor incorruption, happiness nor misery, neither sense nor insensibility.

12 Wherefore, it must needs have been created for a thing of naught; wherefore there would have been no purpose in the end of its creation. Wherefore, this thing must needs destroy the wisdom of God and his eternal purposes, and also the power, and the mercy, and the justice of God.

13 And if ye shall say there is no law, ye shall also say there is no sin. If ye shall say there is no sin, ye shall also say there is no righteousness. And if there be no righteousness there be no happiness. And if there be no righteousness nor happiness there be no punishment nor misery. And if these things are not there is no God. And if there is no God we are not, neither the earth; for there could have been no creation of things, neither to act nor to be acted upon; wherefore, all things must have vanished away.

14 And now, my sons, I speak unto you these things for your profit and learning; for there is a God, and he hath created all things, both the heavens and the earth, and all things that in them are, both things to act and things to be acted upon.

15 And to bring about his eternal purposes in the end of man, after he had created our first parents, and the beasts of the field and the fowls of the air, and in fine, all things which are created, it must needs be that there was an opposition; even the forbidden fruit in opposition to the tree of life; the one being sweet and the other bitter.

16 Wherefore, the Lord God gave unto man that he should act for himself. Wherefore, man could not act for himself save it should be that he was enticed by the one or the other.

17 And I, Lehi, according to the things which I have read, must needs suppose that an angel of God, according to that which is written, had fallen from heaven; wherefore, he became a devil, having sought that which was evil before God.

18 And because he had fallen from heaven, and had become miserable forever, he sought also the misery of all mankind.

Numbers or "score" do not make the difference between winning and losing in the Plan of Salvation. God has already won. There is no contest anymore. God has allowed Satan to act, as a tempter, and Satan does not force this choice on the Father. He is just a necessary element of the plan. It is not a true "war" anymore, because God has already won, when He cast Satan out of heaven. Jesus proved who has power over Satan, when He cast him out while on this earth.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Michael A. Riggsby, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 9/13/1999:
ok here it is: you used to have to wait until you where 21 to go on your mission, now you can go when you turn 19... my queston is when was it changed, and who changed it. if you can answer this for me it will be very helpful... thanks
People have been called to missions at a variety of ages. Mormon was 10 years old when he was called.

Mormon 1:2 And about the time that Ammaron hid up the records unto the Lord, he came unto me, (I being about ten years of age, and I began to be learned somewhat after the manner of the learning of my people) and Ammaron said unto me: I perceive that thou art a sober child, and art quick to observe;

3 Therefore, when ye are about twenty and four years old I would that ye should remember the things that ye have observed concerning this people; and when ye are of that age go to the land Antum, unto a hill which shall be called Shim; and there have I deposited unto the Lord all the sacred engravings concerning this people. And when he was only 15 years old, Mormon was visited by Jesus Christ, and began to preach, Mormon 1:16 ...but my mouth was shut, and I was forbidden that I should preach unto them; for behold they had wilfully rebelled against their God; and the beloved disciples were taken away out of the land, because of their iniquity.

17 But I did remain among them, but I was forbidden to preach unto them, because of the hardness of their hearts; and because of the hardness of their hearts the land was cursed for their sake.

At 16 Mormon was appointed by the people of Nephi to be the leader over their armies. Mormon was an extremely awesome individual. As a youth, he led the nation.

In 1855, Elder Joseph F. Smith (son of Hyrum Smith), was appointed to preside on the island of Maui with Sixtus E. Johnson and Simpson A. Molen as assistants. At this time he was but sixteen years of age, when called to succeed Elder Francis A. Hammond in conducting the affairs of the mission in Maui. This was a grave responsibility for one so young, nevertheless he was greatly respected by his brethren and all with whom he came in contact.

The ages and terms of service of full-time missionaries have varied over the years, and exceptions are made according to circumstance. In 1990, unmarried men ages nineteen through twenty-five, or occasionally older, were called to serve for twenty-four months. Unmarried women ages twenty-one through thirty-nine were called to serve for eighteen months, and those age forty through sixty-nine were called to serve for twelve months. Married couples normally served for either twelve or eighteen months.

(source: Encyclopedia of Mormonism, Vol.2, MISSIONS)


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:James, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/14/1999:
Hello Answerman, I have very much enjoyed reading the Q&A's on the site. It has been informative and reaffirming to me. I am submitting a exerpt from a letter I received from a female freind who is black and with whom we have discussed gospel topics and I have testified to her. I am requesting some help in the delicate manner of responding honestly. Here it is: "1 Nephi 12:23, 2 Nephi 5:21, Jacob 3:5, Alma 3:6- 9, Mormon 5:15, and in the 1830 edition, 2 Nephi 30:6--- all portray a white or light skin as a sign of righteousness and a black or dark skin was a sign of unrighteousness. These scriptures are still used by Mormons. You also believe that Cain conversed with his God daily and knew about the plan of creating this earth. But through jealousy killed his brother. Then that the Lord put a mark on him and when all the other children of Adam have had the privilege of receiving the Priesthood, and of coming into the Kingdom of God, and of being redeemed from the four quarters of the earth, and have received their resurrection from the dead, then it will be time enough to remove the curse from Cain and his posterity. Brigham Young stated in October 1859 in the Journal of Discourses 7:290-291 that "You see some classes of the human family that are black, uncouth, uncomely, disagreeable and low in their habits, wild, and seemingly deprived of nearly all the blessings of the intelligence that is generally bestowed upon mankind..How long is that race to endure the dreadful curse that is upon them? That curse will remain upon them, and they NEVER can hold the Priesthood or share in it until all the other descendants of Adam have received the promises and enjoyed the blessings of the Priesthood and the keys thereof. Until the last ones of the residue of Adam's children are brought up to that favorable position, the children of Cain cannot receive the first ordinances of the Priesthood." Then in March of 1863 he said that if the white man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot. This will always be so." Joseph Smith said in the Doctrines of Salvation in 1954; 1:61, 65-66 that there is a reason why one man is born black and with other disadvantages, while another is born white with great advantages. The reason is that we once had an estate before we came here, and were obedient, more or less, to the laws that were given us there. Those who were faithful in all things there received greater blessings here, and those who were not faithful received less." Tell me James, does this sound like something a loving God would say or do? This is a disgrace to my people, to me, how can you love me and keep this from me, that really hurts me James. Although your church does not talk about this anymore, these teachings are all still in place. According to your very own Scriptures, white is righteous, clean, pure; black or dark is inrighteous, dirty, impure." So, I am a member of three years and have a strong testimony but have yet to answer to any such charges. So, is there a definitive statement on mixed marriages as we would think of them generally today? Are there other materials that address this subject more fully? Thanks for your response. James
Thanks!

In that same talk, Brigham Young said "For their abuse of that race, the whites will be cursed, unless they repent." It is good to read the whole thing. (Journal of Discourses, Vol.10, p.110, Brigham Young, March 8, 1863). Brigham Young said many things that were all true. He was right. He was always right. But it is hard to take when we have so much political correctness today to get everybody up in arms and offended at certain words. When Brigham Young taught that death on the spot was the penalty, he was referring to the Law of Moses, and when the people were governed by ecclesiastical authority (the Church). Death for adultery was in place, death for touching Mount Sinai, death for murder, cursing your father or mother, a lot of things got death as the penalty!

But today, we are all governed not by our prophets directly, but by the Constitution and the laws of the land. It would be good if there was a penalty for adultery, it sure is needed! Anciently it was death.

My take on all of those things that she mentions is that they are all true, but it is important to understand the context of everything. The Book of Mormon DID contain specific accounts of where people's skin color did change according to their wickedness or righteousness. But that was that people. This does not mean that today skin color has ANY bearing on personal righteousness. It was how the Lord handled the separation of these people in that day (Nephites and Lamanites from 600 BC to 421 AD). It provided ample opportunity for the Lord to allow the enemies of the Nephites (the Lamanites) to stir them up unto repentance by warring against them. It worked many times. People were smitten. People were humbled. People repented. The Lord certainly knew what he was doing to keep a covenant people of the Lord for over 1000 years!

The Church has no policy on mixed marriages at all. There is no law against it. In the days of Brigham Young, however, the issue was slightly more volatile, and over 1,000,000 men died as a result of the Civil War. Brigham Young was wise to stay away from the volatile issue of the slave question. They had enough trouble with polygamy!


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Paula Arnts, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 9/14/1999:
Sometimes you guys have no idea how much you touch those of us with problems just by replying to others with questions. I have been confused and unhappy about a certain situation with tithing and by reading your loving spiritual answers to others have re-established strength to just do as HE would want and pay my tithing and worry about the others later. You will surely be blessed by our sweet Lord for the love and guidance you bring to all of us. From Australia I send my love, deepest gratitude and call upon the Lords blessings for all of you for a lifetime.
Paula: Your kind comments have been noted. Thanks. The Book of Mormon scripture is so helpful to us all, it has the answers. God inspired those prophets then to write what they wrote, and it is God's message to us in these latter days. Here is Moroni's farewell to all who would read it:

Moroni 10:30 And again I would exhort you that ye would come unto Christ, and lay hold upon every good gift, and touch not the evil gift, nor the unclean thing.

31 And awake, and arise from the dust, O Jerusalem; yea, and put on thy beautiful garments, O daughter of Zion; and strengthen thy stakes and enlarge thy borders forever, that thou mayest no more be confounded, that the covenants of the Eternal Father which he hath made unto thee, O house of Israel, may be fulfilled.

32 Yea, come unto Christ, and be perfected in him, and deny yourselves of all ungodliness; and if ye shall deny yourselves of all ungodliness and love God with all your might, mind and strength, then is his grace sufficient for you, that by his grace ye may be perfect in Christ; and if by the grace of God ye are perfect in Christ, ye can in nowise deny the power of God.

33 And again, if ye by the grace of God are perfect in Christ, and deny not his power, then are ye sanctified in Christ by the grace of God, through the shedding of the blood of Christ, which is in the covenant of the Father unto the remission of your sins, that ye become holy, without spot.

34 And now I bid unto all, farewell. I soon go to rest in the paradise of God, until my spirit and body shall again reunite, and I am brought forth triumphant through the air, to meet you before the pleasing bar of the great Jehovah, the Eternal Judge of both quick and dead. Amen.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Roger Atkin, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 9/17/1999:
I am a new Elders quarum teacher, I have never tought before and am scared to death. My first lesson is on building personal testimony, can you suggest anything to help me with this subject? thank you Roger
Building personal testimony is something that Alma addressed in the Book of Mormon. He likened our faith and testimony unto a seed. Here is his discourse:

Alma 32:17 Yea, there are many who do say: If thou wilt show unto us a sign from heaven, then we shall know of a surety; then we shall believe.

18 Now I ask, is this faith? Behold, I say unto you, Nay; for if a man knoweth a thing he hath no cause to believe, for he knoweth it.

19 And now, how much more cursed is he that knoweth the will of God and doeth it not, than he that only believeth, or only hath cause to believe, and falleth into transgression?

20 Now of this thing ye must judge. Behold, I say unto you, that it is on the one hand even as it is on the other; and it shall be unto every man according to his work.

21 And now as I said concerning faith--faith is not to have a perfect knowledge of things; therefore if ye have faith ye hope for things which are not seen, which are true.

22 And now, behold, I say unto you, and I would that ye should remember, that God is merciful unto all who believe on his name; therefore he desireth, in the first place, that ye should believe, yea, even on his word.

23 And now, he imparteth his word by angels unto men, yea, not only men but women also. Now this is not all; little children do have words given unto them many times, which confound the wise and the learned.

24 And now, my beloved brethren, as ye have desired to know of me what ye shall do because ye are afflicted and cast out--now I do not desire that ye should suppose that I mean to judge you only according to that which is true--

25 For I do not mean that ye all of you have been compelled to humble yourselves; for I verily believe that there are some among you who would humble themselves, let them be in whatsoever circumstances they might.

26 Now, as I said concerning faith--that it was not a perfect knowledge--even so it is with my words. Ye cannot know of their surety at first, unto perfection, any more than faith is a perfect knowledge.

27 But behold, if ye will awake and arouse your faculties, even to an experiment upon my words, and exercise a particle of faith, yea, even if ye can no more than desire to believe, let this desire work in you, even until ye believe in a manner that ye can give place for a portion of my words.

28 Now, we will compare the word unto a seed. Now, if ye give place, that a seed may be planted in your heart, behold, if it be a true seed, or a good seed, if ye do not cast it out by your unbelief, that ye will resist the Spirit of the Lord, behold, it will begin to swell within your breasts; and when you feel these swelling motions, ye will begin to say within yourselves--It must needs be that this is a good seed, or that the word is good, for it beginneth to enlarge my soul; yea, it beginneth to enlighten my understanding, yea, it beginneth to be delicious to me.

29 Now behold, would not this increase your faith? I say unto you, Yea; nevertheless it hath not grown up to a perfect knowledge.

30 But behold, as the seed swelleth, and sprouteth, and beginneth to grow, then you must needs say that the seed is good; for behold it swelleth, and sprouteth, and beginneth to grow. And now, behold, will not this strengthen your faith? Yea, it will strengthen your faith: for ye will say I know that this is a good seed; for behold it sprouteth and beginneth to grow.

31 And now, behold, are ye sure that this is a good seed? I say unto you, Yea; for every seed bringeth forth unto its own likeness.

32 Therefore, if a seed groweth it is good, but if it groweth not, behold it is not good, therefore it is cast away.

33 And now, behold, because ye have tried the experiment, and planted the seed, and it swelleth and sprouteth, and beginneth to grow, ye must needs know that the seed is good.

34 And now, behold, is your knowledge perfect? Yea, your knowledge is perfect in that thing, and your faith is dormant; and this because you know, for ye know that the word hath swelled your souls, and ye also know that it hath sprouted up, that your understanding doth begin to be enlightened, and your mind doth begin to expand.

35 O then, is not this real? I say unto you, Yea, because it is light; and whatsoever is light, is good, because it is discernible, therefore ye must know that it is good; and now behold, after ye have tasted this light is your knowledge perfect?

36 Behold I say unto you, Nay; neither must ye lay aside your faith, for ye have only exercised your faith to plant the seed that ye might try the experiment to know if the seed was good.

37 And behold, as the tree beginneth to grow, ye will say: Let us nourish it with great care, that it may get root, that it may grow up, and bring forth fruit unto us. And now behold, if ye nourish it with much care it will get root, and grow up, and bring forth fruit.

38 But if ye neglect the tree, and take no thought for its nourishment, behold it will not get any root; and when the heat of the sun cometh and scorcheth it, because it hath no root it withers away, and ye pluck it up and cast it out.

39 Now, this is not because the seed was not good, neither is it because the fruit thereof would not be desirable; but it is because your ground is barren, and ye will not nourish the tree, therefore ye cannot have the fruit thereof.

40 And thus, if ye will not nourish the word, looking forward with an eye of faith to the fruit thereof, ye can never pluck of the fruit of the tree of life.

41 But if ye will nourish the word, yea, nourish the tree as it beginneth to grow, by your faith with great diligence, and with patience, looking forward to the fruit thereof, it shall take root; and behold it shall be a tree springing up unto everlasting life.

42 And because of your diligence and your faith and your patience with the word in nourishing it, that it may take root in you, behold, by and by ye shall pluck the fruit thereof, which is most precious, which is sweet above all that is sweet, and which is white above all that is white, yea, and pure above all that is pure; and ye shall feast upon this fruit even until ye are filled, that ye hunger not, neither shall ye thirst.

43 Then, my brethren, ye shall reap the rewards of your faith, and your diligence, and patience, and long-suffering, waiting for the tree to bring forth fruit unto you.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Alex R. Spong, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/17/1999:
I recently attended a weekly LDS Seminar taught by the author (compliler) of the Encyclopedia Morminism. The seminar was entitled, "The Greatest Week in History" and was a recap of events leading up to the crucifiction and resurrection of the Savior. An interesting notion was raised regarding the timing of the resurrection. I had traditionally understood that Christ was placed on the cross Friday morning and died shortly thereafter. And that he was resurrected on Sunday morning. However, in the seminar it was suggested that perhaps Christ was put on the cross on Thursday and raised again on Sunday morning. This possibility seems to make more sense in light of numerous scriptural references that often cite a 3 day interval. E.G. The Savior responding to the pharisees/scribes that the only sign he would give them (regarding his resurrection) would be the sign of Jonas, ie being in the belly of the fish for 3 days. What are your thoughts on this? Do you think the Savior was placed on the cross on Thursday or Friday? It seems this is an important question as some faiths (7th Day Adventist, Judaism, etc) celebrate the Sabbath at a different time than many Christians ie on Sunday (or the 1st day of the week).
1 Nephi 19:10 ...The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, yieldeth himself, according to the words of the angel, as a man, into the hands of wicked men, to be lifted up, according to the words of Zenock, and to be crucified, according to the words of Neum, and to be buried in a sepulchre, according to the words of Zenos, which he spake concerning the three days of darkness, which should be a sign given of his death unto those who should inhabit the isles of the sea, more especially given unto those who are of the house of Israel.

Mosiah 15:7 Yea, even so he shall be led, crucified, and slain, the flesh becoming subject even unto death, the will of the Son being swallowed up in the will of the Father.

8 And thus God breaketh the bands of death, having gained the victory over death; giving the Son power to make intercession for the children of men--

9 Having ascended into heaven, having the bowels of mercy; being filled with compassion towards the children of men; standing betwixt them and justice; having broken the bands of death, taken upon himself their iniquity and their transgressions, having redeemed them, and satisfied the demands of justice.

Now we have a clue in the New Testament to the time of his crucifixion, but not of his birth; that is, we know that he was crucified on Friday, for all of the Evangelists testify that Saturday was the Jewish Sabbath, and that on Friday Jesus was hung on the cross... Journal of Discourses, Vol.15, p.261, Orson Pratt, December 29, 1872

I have never heard before of the idea that Jesus was lifted up on the cross on a Thursday. We have the New Testament record concerning the timing of Christ's crucifixion, and the mention of the sabbath, which we understand was a Saturday, not a Friday.

On the night of His crucifixion, the record states:

Mark 15:42 And now when the even was come, because it was the preparation, that is, the day before the sabbath,

The question is not whether Christ was placed on the cross on a Thursday or a Friday, but whether the Jewish Sabbath was a Friday or a Saturday. The scriptures seem to be clear: Christ was placed on the cross on the eve of the sabbath.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Dave Mumford, Non-Denominational Christian, Age 50+, wrote on 9/18/1999:
Hi, I make a living from religion, selling books, tapes etc. and giving talks. My wife says that I should give all the money I earn to the poor. But then I would have to work! What is your opinion? D
It depends on WHY one does the things that they do. We should all be careful of the warning of the ancient American/Nephite prophet Nephi who spoke of priestcrafts, where men set themselves up as a light to get gain. I'm not saying you are doing this. He declared:

2 Nephi 26:29 [The Lord] commandeth that there shall be no priestcrafts; for, behold, priestcrafts are that men preach and set themselves up for a light unto the world, that they may get gain and praise of the world; but they seek not the welfare of Zion.

30 Behold, the Lord hath forbidden this thing; wherefore, the Lord God hath given a commandment that all men should have charity, which charity is love. And except they should have charity they were nothing. Wherefore, if they should have charity they would not suffer the laborer in Zion to perish.

31 But the laborer in Zion shall labor for Zion; for if they labor for money they shall perish.

What this means is that the "laborer" in Zion will be taken care of by his own. Zion will have charity and this is the way a laborer in Zion is to make ends meet. People will come forward with money and help, to meet their needs. If one gets rich on this, there is something wrong with the picture. The money is better spent on the poor, because it is sacred money. It was given out of charity. But to meet one's modest needs, that seems OK to me. Luke 10:7 And in the same house remain, eating and drinking such things as they give: for the labourer is worthy of his hire. Go not from house to house. Or in other words, don't beg or ask. Trust in the Lord! How often we hear people asking for money and help, like beggars. I can not imagine Paul or any other ancient Apostle doing this. They would trust in the Lord, and people would come forth out of charity. They would follow the promptings of the Spirit.

A paid ministry is not a good thing. It leads to corruption as we have seen many times even in the last few years, as preachers who take personal shares of the sacred monies that come in from their congregations, and are many times caught in scandal.

for if they labor for money they shall perish.

Motives are everything. To be reimbursed is no sin, but let the saints do it out of charity. Trust that the Lord will take care of you. If we can't have that kind of trust or faith, then get a job.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Ken Lacey, Born Again Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 9/18/1999:
The Book of Mormon/church teaches that Jesus and Lucifer were once brothers up in heaven. When I read the KJV bible in Ephesians 6:12 and Colossians 1:16 it indicates that Jesus created the 'principalities' - one of those must have been Lucifer. How could Jesus be Lucifer's brother and his creator at the same time?
Jesus is the creator, that is true, but there is a limit as to what He created. Certainly He did not create His Father in Heaven, to whom He prayed. The New Testament as well as the Book of Mormon records many instances where Jesus Christ prayed to His Father in Heaven, His literal Father. He was the Son of God, and every son has a father.

3 Nephi 17:17 And no tongue can speak, neither can there be written by any man, neither can the hearts of men conceive so great and marvelous things as we both saw and heard Jesus speak; and no one can conceive of the joy which filled our souls at the time we heard him pray for us unto the Father.

18 And it came to pass that when Jesus had made an end of praying unto the Father, he arose; but so great was the joy of the multitude that they were overcome.

19 And it came to pass that Jesus spake unto them, and bade them arise.

20 And they arose from the earth, and he said unto them: Blessed are ye because of your faith. And now behold, my joy is full.

21 And when he had said these words, he wept, and the multitude bare record of it, and he took their little children, one by one, and blessed them, and prayed unto the Father for them.

22 And when he had done this he wept again;

23 And he spake unto the multitude, and said unto them: Behold your little ones.

Having established that there are at least two beings in the Godhead, and the third is the Holy Ghost, we know that the creator of this earth, Jesus Christ, is in parnership (if you will) with other perfect and eternal beings. That is how God works.

God our Father has a very vast family, and Jesus Christ was His most beloved Son. Jesus Christ was selected among all His sons to be the Savior of the world. Lucifer was rejected, and a third of the hosts of heaven followed after Lucifer when there was a war in heaven. These were cast out of heaven.

1 Nephi 10:21 ...no unclean thing can dwell with God...

Since no unclean thing can dwell in the presence of God, that is why these spirit brother and sisters of ours were cast out of heaven, because they became rebellious and unclean.

Revelation 12:7 And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven.

9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

So we see that Satan was in heaven at one time, and at that time, he was OK enough to still be there. But he turned on God, just as Judas turned on the Savior, and he and a third part of the hosts of heaven lost their first estate and were damned forever.

Since all of us who are here on earth kept our first estate in heaven, we have opportunity to move onward, and if we fully believe in Jesus Christ we can become exalted like He is now. Jesus said to John:

Revelation 3:21 To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:regina phillips, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/18/1999:
who do you think the Nephilim (the sons of God who came down) were??? I am a latter day saint and this really interests me as to whom they may have been,and where did they come from? have any theories?? thanx
Genesis 6:2 ...The sons of God saw the daughters of men that they [were] fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.

The Book of Moses, which also covers some of the same time period renders this more clear:

Moses 8:14 And when these men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, the sons of men saw that those daughters were fair, and they took them wives, even as they chose.

The Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible also renders this scripture as the sons of men.

Even if we allow for the sons of God to be used in this scripture, there are other ways of looking at this. John taught:

John 1:12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, [even] to them that believe on his name:

and Paul:

Romans 8:14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.

There is no need to think the unthinkable, that extra- terrestrial beings (or angels of God for that matter) came down to help populate the earth.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Bert Graef, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/18/1999:
Which of Noah's sons do the Jaredites, Lamanites, and nephites come from. why are there no genealogies in the book of mormon to coincide with the genealogies in the old testament?
Probably Shem, but here is what Moroni said when translating and including the 24 gold plates containing the record of the Jaredite nation:

Ether 1:3 And as I suppose that the first part of this record, which speaks concerning the creation of the world, and also of Adam, and an account from that time even to the great tower, and whatsoever things transpired among the children of men until that time, is had among the Jews--

4 Therefore I do not write those things which transpired from the days of Adam until that time; but they are had upon the plates; and whoso findeth them, the same will have power that he may get the full account. ...and then he goes on to write the genealogy of the prophet Ether back to the first man of this civilation, even Jared.

The Nephite and Lamanite genealogy we know, because we have the record of Alma stating that they came from Manasseh (alma 10:3) and that Ishmael and his family came from Ephraim, and Mulek from King Zedekiah.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Chelsea Jo Rivera, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 9/19/1999:
Where did Heavenly Father come from?
He is eternal, and has always existed, just as you and I have always existed. There never was a time when there were not spirits; for they are co-equal [co-eternal] with our Father in heaven.(see TPJS Section Six 1843-44, p.353).

We are all eternal intelligences, but now we have our opportunity for growth and advancement in God's Plan of Salvation for us, even the Plan of our Heavenly Father. It is now our turn to come to an earth, gain a body of flesh and bone, receive a resurrection, and go on to one of the three Kingdoms of Glory, possibly the Celestial Kingdom of God where Heavenly Father dwells...depending on our faith and obedience to His Son and His commandments.

The prophet Mormon taught:

Mormon 7:5 Know ye that ye must come to the knowledge of your fathers, and repent of all your sins and iniquities, and believe in Jesus Christ, that he is the Son of God, and that he was slain by the Jews, and by the power of the Father he hath risen again, whereby he hath gained the victory over the grave; and also in him is the sting of death swallowed up.

6 And he bringeth to pass the resurrection of the dead, whereby man must be raised to stand before his judgment-seat.

7 And he hath brought to pass the redemption of the world, whereby he that is found guiltless before him at the judgment day hath it given unto him to dwell in the presence of God in his kingdom, to sing ceaseless praises with the choirs above, unto the Father, and unto the Son, and unto the Holy Ghost, which are one God, in a state of happiness which hath no end.

8 Therefore repent, and be baptized in the name of Jesus, and lay hold upon the gospel of Christ, which shall be set before you, not only in this record but also in the record which shall come unto the Gentiles from the Jews, which record shall come from the Gentiles unto you.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Ronald Joseph Smith, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 9/19/1999:
Dear BOMA, I had asked this question about ten months ago, but didn't get an answer. Anyway, here goes: I was teaching a seminary class, last fall, and we came to D&C 63:16, which reads, "and verily I say unto you, as I have said before, he that looketh on a woman to lust after her...shall commit adultery in their hearts." One of the boys said that this adulterous disposition could only be made by MARRIED men. I disagreed, saying that lustful thoughts grieve the Spirit of all men, married or single. It is the desires of one's heart that is at the root of adulterous behaviour. Are there any scripture references that might make this a bit clearer? Can adultery only be committed by married men?
The burden is upon him to prove that this commandment is for married men only. Jesus said to the Nephites:

3 Nephi 12:28 But I say unto you, that whosoever looketh on a woman, to lust after her, hath committed adultery already in his heart.

29 Behold, I give unto you a commandment, that ye suffer none of these things to enter into your heart;

30 For it is better that ye should deny yourselves of these things, wherein ye will take up your cross, than that ye should be cast into hell.

Jesus taught that "whosoever" looks upon a woman in lust, commits this adultery in his heart. "Whosoever" can include a young unmarried man as well. Jesus did not qualify this statement for married men only. The sin of adultery/fornication is capable of being committed by all.

The late prophet Harold B. Lee (and many others!) wrote:

"Thou shalt not commit adultery" (which is unquestionably interpreted to mean all unlawful sexual association, inasmuch as the Master used interchangeably the words adultery and fornication in defining sexual impurity, and it has been severely condemned in every dispensation by authorized church leaders).


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Michael Ferraro, Other Religion, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/19/1999:
Why are Greek words so prevalent throughtout the Book of Mormon? (ie., christ, crucify, baptism, church, Timothy, etc.) Was the Greek culture a major influence on the family of Lehi while living in Jerusalem? If not, why are Alpha & Omega (2 greek letters) used by Jesus when speaking to peoples on this continent, since they were totally seperated from the Old World? [see 3 Nephi 9:18 (34AD)] Thank you for your consideration.
No, the Greek culture was a major influence on America, as these words were common and prevalent already in the United States, where the Bible was had. Joseph Smith was very familiar with the Holy Writ as well and was a student of the word before the age of 14.

Upon translation of the Book of Mormon into the known language of the day, words were used that were familiar to Joseph Smith, for he was the one through whom the Lord worked. All we have to do is read the scriptures such as the New Testament to see how differently language styles come through depending on who wrote the books. To me, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John wrote about the same events, yet used different words in many cases to describe the events. These books are also (in my opinion) significantly easier to read than the writings of the great Apostle Paul, who was multi- cultural being a Jew, a Roman citizen by birth, and familiar with Greek as well. As he speaks to different peoples in his apostolic missionary work efforts, it can be difficult to follow his line of reasoning if one does not consider to WHOM he is speaking, and considering WHAT he is emphasizing. He was dealing with the closure of the law of Moses (a major change for the people) with many individuals who were either considering the new doctrines of Christ, or were holding on to the older law. Thus the emphasis on grace and the deadness of the law (which many today interpret as license not to worry about keeping the commandments, the ordinances of baptism, etc.)

In Paul's theology, the doctrines of salvation by grace and justification by faith do not eliminate but require the absolute necessity for high personal standards of conduct (see 1 Cor. 6:9-11; Gal. 5:19-21).

So what is my point? These prophets wrote what they felt, and what they were inspired to write. They covered the same topics with different words: their words, their style.

Joseph Smith translated the Book of Mormon into the language of his mind. He knew the little bit of Greek influence that was in the Americas at the time.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:anonymous, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 9/21/1999:
Something has been bothering me: I hear said that we need to try transgression or sin in order to understand it and to gain experience and know what we're trying to overcome. Well, I don't like that idea and would like some help with the argument for the other side. Can you help me strengthen my perspective? Thank you much
That is a false thing you have heard. Jesus never tried sin, yet He understood all things. Alma knew this and taught:

Alma 7:11 And he shall go forth, suffering pains and afflictions and temptations of every kind; and this that the word might be fulfilled which saith he will take upon him the pains and the sicknesses of his people.

12 And he will take upon him death, that he may loose the bands of death which bind his people; and he will take upon him their infirmities, that his bowels may be filled with mercy, according to the flesh, that he may know according to the flesh how to succor his people according to their infirmities.

Alma reveals that the Savior suffered affliction and pain, and was not absolved from temptations of any kind, so that he might fully understand his people. There is a popular myth which teaches that good people know little if anything about the power of temptation. This is patently false. It is the wicked who know little of its allure, its seducing force, and its punishing power because they never resist. How do they know what it is like to have to be strong for an hour, a day, or a year. The Savior never gave in. He stands alone as the one who never fell captive to the enticements of sin for an entire lifetime. He knows more about the power of temptation than any. For this reason, he can "succor his people according to their infirmities.

(source: JBMS p.88)


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Steven A. Pocock, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 9/22/1999:
A friend of mine told me that the Prophet while traveling through Huntsville, Missouri, during Zion's camp said that this was the original location of the city of Manti. The Manti named in the Book of Mormon. He said this was confirmed in two seperate journals and re- confirmed in another book, which I cannot remember. Can you confirm this? Or debunk it? I would appreciate your help. Thanks, Steven A. Pocock
It is!

Here are the exerpts from Church History journals:

"The camp passed through Huntsville, in Randolph County, which has been appointed as one of the stakes of Zion, and is the ancient site of the City of Manti, and pitched tents at Dark Creek, Salt Licks, seventeen miles. It was reported to the camp that one hundred and ten men had volunteered from Randolph and gone to Far West to settle difficulties." (taken from the history of the travels of the Kirtland Camp)

"September 25, 1838. We passed through Huntsville, Co, seat of Randolph Co, Pop. 450, and three miles further we bought 32 bu, of corn off one of the brethren who resides in this place. There are several of the brethren round about here and this is the ancient site of the City of Manti, which is spoken of in the Book of Mormon and this is appointed one of the Stakes of Zion, and it is in Randolph County, Missouri, three miles west of the county seat." (taken from the daily journal of the Kirtland Camp, and was written by Samuel D. Tyler)


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:dave, Other Religion, Age 18-24, wrote on 10/2/1999:
Dear Answerman, I have a number of mormon friends who have tried to enlighten me over the years of their beliefs, all of them have been members from a very young age as I believe you also have. My friends tell me of a feeling they get inside(the Holy Ghost I believe) where they know with no uncertainty that their church is the true and only church of God. My question is this, how can a person who has been a member of one church their whole life have had an opportunity to explore the many other religions in this world, is it not possible that the feeling a Protestant, for example, gets in their heart is even a greater one than what a mormon might feel? I'm certain that Hindus, Muslims, Jews, Buhdists, Catholics, etc. all experiance feelings inside that tell their heart that what they believe is true. So in conclusion isn't it ignorant to say that with no uncertainty at all the mormon church is the one and only true church of God, when most members have probably not even explored any other options at all? I ask only because I'm In search of the truth and it frustrates me to see my friends so content with ignoring all other religions and spiritual traditions in the world. They seem to me to be hypocrites. Thank you.
Everyone who is born into the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter- day Saints must come to a turning point where they gain a testimony of various truths. But since faith is like a seed which grows into a tree, it is a process that evolves (see Alma 32)

So how do we know if what we have is more or less than what others have? Well, we can't speak for others, only ourselves. If the "fruit" of the tree of our faith is delicious, and we know it is because we like the way it tastes, then why would one abandon such a tree bearing fruit? Would one chop down a perfect fruit tree, and go searching for another tree?

Alma 32:37 And behold, as the tree beginneth to grow, ye will say: Let us nourish it with great care, that it may get root, that it may grow up, and bring forth fruit unto us. And now behold, if ye nourish it with much care it will get root, and grow up, and bring forth fruit.

38 But if ye neglect the tree, and take no thought for its nourishment, behold it will not get any root; and when the heat of the sun cometh and scorcheth it, because it hath no root it withers away, and ye pluck it up and cast it out.

39 Now, this is not because the seed was not good, neither is it because the fruit thereof would not be desirable; but it is because your ground is barren, and ye will not nourish the tree, therefore ye cannot have the fruit thereof.

40 And thus, if ye will not nourish the word, looking forward with an eye of faith to the fruit thereof, ye can never pluck of the fruit of the tree of life.

41 But if ye will nourish the word, yea, nourish the tree as it beginneth to grow, by your faith with great diligence, and with patience, looking forward to the fruit thereof, it shall take root; and behold it shall be a tree springing up unto everlasting life.

42 And because of your diligence and your faith and your patience with the word in nourishing it, that it may take root in you, behold, by and by ye shall pluck the fruit thereof, which is most precious, which is sweet above all that is sweet, and which is white above all that is white, yea, and pure above all that is pure; and ye shall feast upon this fruit even until ye are filled, that ye hunger not, neither shall ye thirst.

43 Then, my brethren, ye shall reap the rewards of your faith, and your diligence, and patience, and long-suffering, waiting for the tree to bring forth fruit unto you.

This is the proof of one's faith: are they truly enjoying the fruit of the Spirit...

Now as to our ability to judge what other faiths have to offer, it is a simple matter of considering the doctrines, praying about them, seeing if they are compatible with that which we have already come to know is true by the power of the Spirit and personal prayer...etc. If we have tasted of fruit, and it is sweet and wonderful, there is no need to reject that which we know. It is a benchmark by which other things can be judged.

I have examined, for instance, the doctrines of other faiths, and so many of the world religions deny the divine nature of Jesus Christ, and I can reject that false doctrine without delay, because the Holy Ghost has made such a strong witness to my soul that He lives, that He is my Savior, my God, my King. I have a benchmark by which to judge. I have a witness.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Heather Loyalll, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 10/2/1999:
Recently I was speaking to a co- worker about religion, and he stated that he could not believe anything in the Book of Mormon because it is not supported by the Bible. I remember when my family was converted we were shone a verse in the Bible that said there would be other books, or Jesus would visit other lands. I can't remember the exact spot please tell me were it is so I can show it to my co-worker. Thank you.
Jesus taught His disciples:

And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd. (John 10:16.)

The prophet Ezekiel also received a revelation concerning the keeping of the record of these "other sheep" who were descendants of Joseph of Egypt. Joseph was of the House of Israel, and had Ephraim and Manasseh for sons. The Book of Mormon is a record of Lehi and his family who were of the House of Israel, and were led by the Lord to the Americas. The prophet Ezekiel wrote about the record that they would keep, which would come forth in our day to be a tool for the gathering of Israel:

Ezekiel 37:15 The word of the LORD came again unto me, saying,

16 Moreover, thou son of man, take thee one stick, and write upon it, For Judah, and for the children of Israel his companions: then take another stick, and write upon it, For Joseph, the stick of Ephraim, and [for] all the house of Israel his companions:

17 And join them one to another into one stick; and they shall become one in thine hand.

18 And when the children of thy people shall speak unto thee, saying, Wilt thou not shew us what thou [meanest] by these?

19 Say unto them, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Behold, I will take the stick of Joseph, which [is] in the hand of Ephraim, and the tribes of Israel his fellows, and will put them with him, [even] with the stick of Judah, and make them one stick, and they shall be one in mine hand.

20 And the sticks whereon thou writest shall be in thine hand before their eyes.

Today, this prophecy stands fulfilled as the Bible and Book of Mormon have become one in our hands, and these are being used for the gathering of Israel throughout all the world.


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Elizabeth, Catholic Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 10/2/1999:
Do Later Day Saints believe that Jesus died on the cross for our sins? Also, what is the difference - besides believing that JS is the prophet - between Mormanism and main-stream Christianity? Thanks, Elizabeth
Yes, we believe that Jesus Christ suffered in the Garden of Gethsemane for our sins, and died on the cross as well for us. The ancient Book of Mormon prophet Nephi saw in vision:

1 Nephi 11:33 And I, Nephi, saw that [Jesus Christ] was lifted up upon the cross and slain for the sins of the world.

There are many similarities, but it is the authority and ordinances of the gospel that make up the main differences. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was restored. Not reformed. Not created new. But Restored, from its original state first by God the Father and Jesus Christ calling Joseph Smith directly as a prophet, and then sending Peter James and John who came as resurrected angels to give the priesthood authority to act in the name of God (Melchizedek Priesthood) directly to Joseph Smith. This is one of the primary differences. The Book of Mormon scripture is also a very important new revelation and covenant that has come to the people today (see D&C 84:54-58)


The Book of Mormon ANSWERMAN (BOMA)
QUESTION from:Sheila, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 10/3/1999: