
| QUESTION from:George Trevino, Born Again Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 3/31/1999: | |
| Hello again friend. Interesting response, but I'll have to disagree. First of all, Jesus never had to progress because he was already God. Jesus serves as the second being in the triune nature of God. He made himself flesh. He was fully man, but yet fully God. He willingly stripped away all divine rights as God, and took upon the form a servant. It was God's perfect plan that God the Son will live on Earth and be subject to the will of God the Father. Second of all, God is three beings and are of the same essence of one God, not "acting as one" John 10:30: "I and my Father are one". This does not mean just one in purpose. The Greek word for one is "neuter" meaning in gender or in essence. Jesus meant that they were the exact same material. Always waiting to here a response. See you then. | |
George:
I guess we will not see eye to eye
on this one, because we believe
something different. Jesus created
this world. No doubt he was
already God before he was born in
the flesh. That is not the issue.
Receiving a body of flesh and bone
as part of the resurrection is the
progression. We have evidence of
this progression right in the
scriptural record. He kept the
body.
|
| QUESTION from:SIMON HARRELL bbbcafe@aol.com, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 4/1/1999: | |
| Beginning reading of your book, it is noted that MOSES is mentioned so the undertakings were done after THE COMMANDMENTS were given to the people of ISRAEL. Therefore how can you justify the killing of a man for the purpose of obtaining geneology, KING DAVID fell out of favor and was punished for putting a man on the front line to be killed for the purpose of obtaining his wife. Our SAVIOR JESUS THE CHRIST had the power to destroy his enemy but would've and did die before he would go against the COMMANDMENT of his FATHER. Prophets were inspired to write the BIBLE books that we read today, yet the same inspiration was not obtained for the purpose of finding out ones heritage? That angel that told the youngest brother to kill was not of GOD, in my opinion, and one should reconsider this doctrine that is being considered by your congregation, for GOD doesnot go against his own COMMANDMENT. He gives and only he will takes away. Please I am awaiting a response to this matter and not just preaching, for I am a practicing sinner who is lightly studying the WORD and found these matters most disturbing and will convey these concerns to the young ELDER that gave me your book to read as soon as he calls me. | |
You are no doubt referring to the
slaying of wicked Laban by the
righteous prophet Nephi, as he was
commanded to do so by the Lord.
How could he kill and not break
the commandment "Thou shalt not
kill" which the Lord had already
given to Moses...Have you considered that a similar account of killing, even a much more serious account, is given the in the Old Testament? After the 10 commandments were given through Moses...
1 Samuel 15:1 SAMUEL also said
unto Saul, ...hearken thou unto
the voice of the words of the LORD.
If God can command His covenant people to slay man, woman, and infant, etc., to further His purposes, can He command Nephi to slay Laban? |
| QUESTION from:Joseph Woodruff, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 4/2/1999: | |
| This question is more from the Bible, but it's important. After being shown a passage (John 7:37-38, and then reading to 39) a few things confused me. Jesus basically said here that those who believed him would be filled with the Spirit. In verse 39, the JST states "But this spake he of the Spirit, which they that believe on him should receive: for the Holy Ghost was promised unto them who believe, after that Jesus was glorified." Does this mean that they were to receive the gift of the HG only AFTER Jesus was glorifed? (what's meant by him being glorified - resurrected?) Also, did Jesus have to be ordained to the priesthood, in the same order that we do - after baptism - or was it already upon him from birth because of his godliness? If he needed to be ordained, is there any record of Heavenly Father doing it? Thanks. | |
There is no record of Jesus
receiving the Priesthood or who he
received it from. John the
baptist already had authority to
baptize before he baptized Jesus,
it seems logical that Jesus Christ
also already had his priesthood
authority as well. His baptism
was to fulfill all righteousness,
and to set an example for us.
2 Nephi 31:5 And now, if the Lamb
of God, he being holy, should have
need to be baptized by water, to
fulfil all righteousness, O then,
how much more need have we, being
unholy, to be baptized, yea, even
by water!
When Jesus was with his Apostles, they had him for their guide. He was a member of the Godhead, and it was a very special thing for him to be in their midst. After he was resurrected, they bestowed the gift of the Holy Ghost upon each other as is recorded in the Book of Acts, and the Holy Ghost became their guide. Even so, the second comforter (Jesus Christ) was promised to those who believe and hunger and thirst after righteousness:
The Second Comforter
When the Lord has thoroughly
proved him, and finds that the man
is determined to serve Him at all
hazards, then the man will find
his calling and his election made
sure, then it will be his
privilege to receive the other
Comforter, which the Lord hath
promised the Saints, as is
recorded in the testimony of St.
John, in the 14th chapter, from
the 12th to the 27th verses.
Now what is this other Comforter?
It is no more nor less than the
Lord Jesus Christ Himself; and
this is the sum and substance of
the whole matter; that when any
man obtains this last Comforter,
he will have the personage of
Jesus Christ to attend him, or
appear unto him from time to time,
and even He will manifest the
Father unto him, and they will
take up their abode with him, and
the visions of the heavens will be
opened unto him, and the Lord will
teach him face to face, and he may
have a perfect knowledge of the
mysteries of the Kingdom of God;
and this is the state and place
the ancient Saints arrived at when
they had such glorious visions-
Isaiah, Ezekiel, John upon the
Isle of Patmos, St. Paul in the
three heavens, and all the Saints
who held communion with the
general assembly and Church of the
Firstborn. |
| QUESTION from:Eduardo romero,Alejandro Vanegas, Other Religion, Age 18-24, wrote on 4/3/1999: | |
| Hi answerman, thank you for the answer to my question. But I still not satisfied with the answer you sent me. Because "Baptism" means: It means confessions and remission of our sins and knowing this we take the the decision of repentance of our sins and be a new person in Christ, fighting along with him to free us of the enemies trap. Now, how can the dead obtain forgiveness of their sin, if first is a personal decesion and nobody can take it by another person. We don't know if they are repented and desire to be baptise. Because we that live have hope, but that hope have it those who only trust him and do his will that is wht there will be two resurrection those who died in God and those who died in sin. | |
Baptism for the dead is a
vicarious ordinance. We believe
it to be of effect when done by
proper authority, and that every
spirit for whom it is done still
has the choice to accept or reject
our willing offering for them.
Much like everyone has the choice
to accept or reject the vicarious
Atonement that Christ did for us.
It is a small thing, compared to
what the Savior did for us, but
vicarious ordinances are possible.
Jesus did it in His Atonement.Because of Jesus Christ's suffering in the garden of Gethsemane and his death on the cross, He suffered FOR us, in behalf of us, and this counted in the eyes of the Father. Jesus suffered vicariously for us, and so we see that it is a legitimate thing, to perform something vicariously, for even Christ did this for all who would believe on Him. He suffered the pains of hell so that we might not suffer.
D&C 19:16 For behold, I, God, have
suffered these things for all,
that they might not suffer if they
would repent;
I hope this helps you see that vicarious ordinances are not such a strange thing, since Jesus Christ Himself did this for all mankind. He has commanded us to do these baptisms through His prophets today, and so we do them so that His people may receive salvation. |
| QUESTION from:Mario Deleon, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 4/5/1999: | |
| What is supposed to happen at adam- ondi-amon? | |
ESTABLISHING THE KINGDOM: THE
GREAT COUNCIL AT ADAM-ONDI-AHMAN.-
A great council will then be held
to adjust the affairs of the
world, from the commencement, over
which Father Adam will preside as
head and representative of the
human family....
Then they will assemble to regulate all these affairs, and all that held keys of authority to administer will then represent their earthly course. And as this authority has been handed down from one to another in different ages, and in different dispensations, a full reckoning will have to be made by all. All who have held the keys of priesthood will then have to give an account to those from whom they received them. Those that were in the heavens have been assisting those that were upon the earth; but then, they will unite together in a general council to give an account of their stewardships, and as in the various ages men have received their power to administer from those who had previously held the keys thereof, there will be a general account. Those under the authorities of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints have to give an account of their transactions to those who direct them in the priesthood; hence the elders give an account to presidents of conferences; and presidents of conferences to presidents of nations. Those presidents and the seventies give an account to the twelve apostles; the twelve to the First Presidency; and they to Joseph, from whom they, and the twelve, received their priesthood. This will include the arrangements of the last dispensation. Joseph delivers his authority to Peter, who held the keys before him, and delivered them to him; and Peter to Moses and Elias, who endowed him with this authority on the Mount; and they to those from whom they received them. And thus the world's affairs will be regulated and put right, the restitution of all things be accomplished, and the kingdom of God be ushered in. The earth will be delivered from under the curse, resume its paradisiacal glory, and all things pertaining to its restoration be fulfilled. (John Taylor, The Gospel Kingdom, p.216) D&C 116:1 SPRING Hill is named by the Lord Adam-ondi-Ahman, because, said he, it is the place where Adam shall come to visit his people, or the Ancient of Days shall sit, as spoken of by Daniel the prophet. |
| QUESTION from:Michael Wysmierski, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 4/5/1999: | |
| Do demons, devils ever recieve physical bodies? Are there any incidents in the Bible where demons, devils have physical bodies besides those times when they took possession of people? | |
Jude 1:6 And the angels which kept
not their first estate, but left
their own habitation, he hath
reserved in everlasting chains
under darkness unto the judgment
of the great day. Abraham 3:28 And the second [Lucifer] was angry, and kept not his first estate; and, at that day, many followed after him. These will never get a body of flesh and bone. Their body is of spirit only. They/We received our spirit bodies from our Heavenly Parents in in the Premortal Existence.
Joseph Smith taught: |
| QUESTION from:Heather Brittain, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 4/6/1999: | |
| The church teaches that Adam and Eve could not have children in the garden of Eden. How do we know this? I also want to know what your opinion is of the 144,000 John talks about in the book of revelations. thank you Heather | |
Well, we do not know how long Adam
and Eve were in the garden, but we
do know that they did not have any
children. Maybe this is our proof
that it was not possible. Lehi taught that it was not possible, so we have a prophet in the Book of Mormon that testified to these things. 2 Nephi 2:23 And they would have had no children; wherefore they would have remained in a state of innocence, having no joy, for they knew no misery; doing no good, for they knew no sin. There is not a lot said about the 144,000, except what is contained in D&C 77:11
D&C 77:11 Q. What are we to
understand by sealing the one
hundred and forty-four thousand,
out of all the tribes of Israel--
twelve thousand out of every tribe?
|
| QUESTION from:Jenny Wells, Protestant Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 4/7/1999: | |
| What do the Mormon's believe happened to the twelve lost tribes of Israel after the Assaryian conquest in 722 B.C.? | |
No one knows for sure where the 10
lost tribes of Israel were
scattered to. But they were
scattered, and they will be
gathered again, as contained in
the scripture prophecies.
Jeremiah 31:10 Hear the word of the LORD, O ye nations, and declare [it] in the isles afar off, and say, He that scattered Israel will gather him, and keep him, as a shepherd [doth] his flock.
The Book of Mormon contains a
record of peoples who were of the
House of Israel, who were
scattered as prophesied, and these
were compared to an olive tree,
whose branches were broken off: |
| QUESTION from:David Riggin, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 4/7/1999: | |
| Dear Answerman: My question is straightforward. Why do we (LDS) keep Sunday as our sabbath day? I understand that the most important aspect of the sabbath is to keep it holy but how has the actual day changed from Saturday to Sunday? I look forward to your response as it will not only help me but also any non-LDS friends and associates who I may have the opportunity to introduce to the church. | |
You will find in the New Testament
that after the resurrection of
Jesus Christ, the Apostles were
meeting together to break bread
(sacrament) on the First day of
the week, which is a Sunday. That
seems to be why it has changed.
The original Apostles did it, and
they were most likely inspired to
do so, possibly by instruction
from Jesus Christ Himself.
|
| QUESTION from:MICHAEL J COX, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 4/9/1999: | |
| It is often stated that there should be a seperation of church and state. It seems many of the church members sanction this stance. On the other hand public systems are often criticized by members of the church for not supporting prayer in school,trying to keep religion out of school,etc. We strive to achieve a government as the Lord would want, yet we believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, etc.. What may be the proper attitude toward church and state? Thank you! | |
Michael:
There is no language in our
Constitution pertaining to
separation of church and state,
but only that the congress shall
make no law establishing one. Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. We are always subject to our King Jesus Christ first and foremost, and we obey the laws of the land, as long as the laws of the land are honorable. If not, we must fight against it, for it would be evil to go along with evil. That is what many people do, however. Many are under the misconception that it is against our God-given constitution to be religious. This is an error, for this nation was founded on a belief in Jesus Christ. Indeed, Jesus Christ is the God of this land. The Book of Mormon teaches us this: Ether 2:12 12 Behold, this is a choice land, and whatsoever nation shall possess it shall be free from bondage, and from captivity, and from all other nations under heaven, if they will but serve the God of the land, who is Jesus Christ, who hath been manifested by the things which we have written. With language such as this, there is no true latter-day saint who can stand idly by, and watch our nation succomb to humanism, atheism, and godless socialism and eventually communism. We must stand up for what is right. We must be religious and faithful. We should be as Captain Moroni was, and be counted. Alma 46:13 And [Captain Moroni] fastened on his head-plate, and his breastplate, and his shields, and girded on his armor about his loins; and he took the pole, which had on the end thereof his rent coat, (and he called it the title of liberty) and he bowed himself to the earth, and he prayed mightily unto his God for the blessings of liberty to rest upon his brethren, so long as there should a band of Christians remain to possess the land-- |
| QUESTION from:steve, Born Again Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 4/11/1999: | |
| is the book of mormon written in chronilogical order. We know that the Bible isn't. | |
The Book of Mormon is not written
in Chronological order. It was
abridged from many records by the
ancient American prophet Mormon,
and it contains in one of its last
books, Ether, and account of the
Jaredite nation which preceeded
the Nephite/Lamanite nation. Hope
this helps!
|
| QUESTION from:Jared Clark, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 4/12/1999: | |
| Unfortunately, I couldn't attend last General Conference. Could you tell me where I could find somewhere on the WEB the transcription of all sessions ? Thank you. | |
Yes, you will find these on www.lds.o
rg under the Member Resources
section, and then you will see the
link to the General Conference
proceedings.
|
| QUESTION from:Kyle Oyakawa, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 4/14/1999: | |
| I came across an appalling answer to a question about vestigial organs. In the answer (which contained horrid grammar) it stated that darwinism, huxleyism, and evolution in general are "dark age" religions. It also said that scientists who believe in evolution are not to be trusted and are in the minority in the scientific field. Firstly evolution is not a religion it is a scientific fact. The only question remaining about evolution is the process, not the actuality. Secondly, the vast majority, not the minority, of scientists now believe firmly in evolution. Evolution does not disprove any part of the Bible or other scripture, it just takes some involved thinking to integrate the two issues. In fact, there has never been an official declaration from the Church disputing evolution. I am a Biology/Chemistry major and a recent convert and the tone of that answer made me very upset. | |
Kyle:
This is a controversial topic.
(that may explain why the First
Presidency does not address it
officially, but leaves it up to
scientists).I am personally motivated to speak on subjects pertaining to the scriptures. To address the theories of science in a scientific way is inappropriate for me to do so, for I am not a scientist. But to state my opinions/beliefs on them is fully appropriate, for that is any individuals right of free speech, and the ability of any child of God with the help of His Spirit to do learn truth and discover error. Evolution is NOT a scientific fact, it is a THEORY. Creationism is a fact, although many would call it a theory. Whenever belief or faith in an idea/theory comes into play, it becomes religion. Now, there is a Book of Mormon scripture that teaches that there was no death in the world before the Fall of Adam. Here it is: 2 Nephi 2:22 And now, behold, if Adam had not transgressed he would not have fallen, but he would have remained in the garden of Eden. And all things which were created must have remained in the same state in which they were after they were created; and they must have remained forever, and had no end. What this means, is that Adam would NOT have evolved further (assuming he evolved in the first place). This kind of disproves the theory of evolution in my way of thinking, and I believe that Adam was _brought_ here in the first place as Brigham Young has taught, so I do not sympathize with the theory of evolution despite the findings of ancient bones (which may have had nothing to do with this world in the first place). |
| QUESTION from:Eric Jeide, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 4/14/1999: | |
| can you help me out with the whole marriage thing? I was just wondering where in the BIBLE (especially in the BIBLE) and the BOM where it says things about marriage. I am trying to explain its importance to some people and don't know quite how to do it. Thanx | |
Eric:
If we look only to the Bible for
answers, we will be in the same
struggle that all of our other
brothers and sisters of all faiths
are in today. That is why there is
so much conflict in doctrine, many
winds of doctrine, and people ever
learning and never able to come to
a knowledge of the truth (2
Timothy 3:7)If we utilize the revelations that Jesus Christ gave to us through His prophets that He called in this last dispensation, the message is clear: Marriage is ordained of God! We, the First Presidency and the Council of the Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, solemnly proclaim that marriage between a man and a woman is ordained of God and that the family is central to the Creator's plan for the eternal destiny of His children. See http://www.lds.org/en/4_Official_ Church_Policy/Proclamation.html for a complete transcription of this important revelation and statement. The Bible and Book of Mormon teaches of marriage by the many good examples of the prophets who wrote the records. They were married men. The Doctrine and Covenants 131 teaches unmistakeably the absolute importance of marriage in the temple of God. It is the very key to exaltation in the Celestial Kingdom. I would recommend that your focus be on the restoration of the Gospel, and then after a person has a testimony of that, they should also accept the other doctrines, such as marriage being ordained of God, as true doctrines. |
| QUESTION from:Jared CLARK, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 4/16/1999: | |
| I'd like to know whether the Word of Wisdow allows us to eat candies or chocolate with some coffee inside. Could you tell me if it just the beverage or the ingredient which is harmful ? Thanks | |
I would recommend that you read
D&C 89 and see exactly what is in
there. It is plain that candy and
chocolate are not mentioned, and
specific ingredients are also not
mentioned. This revelation only
mentions "hot drinks" which have
been defined by the prophets to
mean coffee and tea. We can
rationalize with our minds forever
on this kind of thing, but the
Spirit, if we listen to Him, will
teach us the way to use food for
our good. We will eat the grains
and wheat, avoid the meat when
possible, and drink only good
things into our bodies. It is
really simple if we read it with
an open and sincere mind. We will
know how to eat right. It will
take time for us to overcome our
poor eating habits if we have for
years indulged in various "junk
foods."
An interesting idea, and possibly
the reason the Lord gave us this
revelation in the first place
(Word of Wisdom), is that our
modern society is so flooded with
various diets, junk foods,
candies, drugs, and fast food
meat and quick liquor at every
corner of the street, that it can
become very easy to eat and drink
the wrong things. The Word of
Wisdom revelation teaches us: |
| QUESTION from:Kenneth McKinney, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 4/17/1999: | |
| I am curious about the descriptions by the Book of Mormon prophets before the birth of Jesus Christ. A number of them in Book of Mormon scripture describe Christ's death using the words "cross" and "crucifixion". Did these prophets know anything about that mode of execution? During which time in history was crucifixion used? Or was that just the way that Joseph Smith translated the plates (since he would have already known how Jesus died)? | |
These prophets saw in vision that
which the Lord showed to them by
His power. Nephi saw ALL that the
Apostle John saw and wrote about
in the Book of Revelation, over
600 years BEFORE John saw it. How
did these prophets see the end of
the world? By the power of God.
They can most certainly see Jesus
being lifted up on a cross and
write about this event in great
detail.
Nephi had a vision of the world
from the beginning to the end.
Here is a small sample of the
vision which occupies four
chapters in the Book of Mormon.
1 Nephi 11:32 And it came to pass
that the angel spake unto me
again, saying: Look! And I looked
and beheld the Lamb of God, that
he was taken by the people; yea,
the Son of the everlasting God was
judged of the world; and I saw and
bear record.
33 And I, Nephi, saw that he
was lifted up upon the cross and
slain for the sins of the world.
34 And after he was slain I saw
the multitudes of the earth, that
they were gathered together to
fight against the apostles of the
Lamb; for thus were the twelve
called by the angel of the
Lord. The language that Nephi used is "and I saw and bear record," which makes him an eye witness. |
| QUESTION from:brian jordan, Born Again Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 4/18/1999: | |
| Why do you claim to be Christians on Tv.. when in fact Joseph smith said Christian relgions\ were false apostates,so why do you tell people you are Christian when in fact you say they are the devils church?is that a lie?because it sure is misleading | |
I would say that the word
Christian denotes being a follower
of Christ. Indeed the Book of
Mormon teaches of the "band of
Christians" that possessed the
land in the day of the Nephites
and Lamanites.
Alma 46:13 And [Captain Moroni]
fastened on his head-plate, and
his breastplate, and his shields,
and girded on his armor about his
loins; and he took the pole, which
had on the end thereof his rent
coat, (and he called it the title
of liberty) and he bowed himself
to the earth, and he prayed
mightily unto his God for the
blessings of liberty to rest upon
his brethren, so long as there
should a band of Christians remain
to possess the land--
14 For thus were all the true
believers of Christ, who belonged
to the church of God, called by
those who did not belong to the
church.
15 And those who did belong to
the church were faithful; yea, all
those who were true believers in
Christ took upon them, gladly, the
name of Christ, or Christians as
they were called, because of their
belief in Christ who should come.
16 And therefore, at this
time, Moroni prayed that the cause
of the Christians, and the freedom
of the land might be favored.
In the days of Moroni, we have no record that others were also calling themselves Christian. But today we have hundreds of very different denominations calling themselves Christians. The title Christian is what it is. It falls where it falls. It most certainly should fall upon the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which bears His name, and which was restored personally by Him to this earth, when He personally called Joseph Smith to be His prophet, and later sent His angels to instruct him, and give him the priesthood and other revelations. If these things are true, then is not the title Christian appropriate for this people? If there is One Lord, one faith, one baptism (Ephesians 4:5) as Paul taught, then which one is it? I will tell you. It is the one that was Restored to the earth, in all of its fulness. Apostles and Prophets, Priesthood, ordinances, doctrines, and temples to seal the families for all time and eternity as God would have it be done. It is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. This is the way, and if people will listen to the Spirit prompting them with what is true and right, they will humble themselves and follow the way that Jesus Christ has personally revealed to the world in these last days. It is He, even Jesus Christ, who said that all other organizations were corrupt and were an abomination in His sight. (JSH 1:19) That is why He restored his gospel and church in its fulness to the earth once more. It is extremely important to Jesus Christ that all these things be done properly, and with His permission. Authority matters. Order matters. His very actions and words in these last days prove that this is so. |
| QUESTION from:Daniel McCall, Born Again Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 4/21/1999: | |
| Why has there been no archealogical evidence about what the BOM says? There is all kinds of evidence about citys and ect. that the Bible speaks about, but none in the Book of Mormon. | |
I would ask you about the
archeological evidence of the City
of Enoch which was taken up to
heaven. Or of the Garden of Eden
where Adam and Eve, our first
parents dwelt. Or of the great
flood in the days of Noah. What
of these things in the Bible? Is
there "proof" for them? I would
say not. Yet many people believe
them as factual accounts, so do
I. I need no archeology to
believe.Why is this question brought up about the Book of Mormon so often? Why are not the words of the prophets able to stand on their own with the support of the Spirit of God? Do we need to know where the city in which they preached existed, in order to know that the words they preached are true? Why is it important to know where the city is that they were in? The only thing that these kind of questions mean, is that you have doubt as to the authenticity of the record itself. As if authenticity would make it true. The Bible is not true because Jerusalem can be found today! It is true because it is the words of prophets! If the Book of Mormon were a fabrication of Joseph Smith, and he had made a trip to South America to get the names of real cities there (as they are named now), and had included this in the record, would that cause you to believe in it? I believe that even so, you would still have your doubts as you have now, because you are doubting not because of archeology, but because of what it means to accept the Book of Mormon as the word of God. It means becoming a Mormon, and that is a difficult thought, isn't it?
The real question is: How do we come to a
knowledge of the truth so
that we do not be
Ever learning, and never able to
come to the knowledge of the truth?
It has got to be through the Spirit, and not by the methods of man. This is how we come to a knowledge of the truth. Prayer. Revelation. The witness of the Holy Ghost, which I can truthfully say, has witnessed to my soul on numerous occasion, that the Book of Mormon is true. If the Book of Mormon is the word of God, it can be tested by reading it, and praying about it. God will tell us if He did indeed reveal these words to His ancient American prophets. He will witness that Joseph Smith was also His prophet, and that the Book of Mormon was preserved specifically for our day because the things that are taught in this book are so extremely important for the nation, and for the world. |
| QUESTION from:Michael D. Rodrigues, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 4/21/1999: | |
| I would just like to tell you that I think you are doing a GREAT job with your web site. I myself am 16 and was slowly drifting from the LDS. However, in reading testimonies such as yours, and from investigating other churches, my testimony has only grown. Thanks again. My question is regarding the RLDS. If you know anything about their beliefs, can you please give me some ideas or scriptures perhaps, that I can use in our churches' defense? I am afraid that 3 years of seminary and my own testimony is never enough to battle experienced leaders of other churches. Thanks so much. mike in CA | |
I am very happy that your
testimony is strong.The RLDS church emerged during the 1850s from the conflict and schism that arose in Mormonism after the June 27, 1844, murder of Joseph Smith, Jr., its founding prophet. The RLDS are the Latter-day Saints who did not follow the Quorum of 12 Apostles to Utah. They condemned polygamy, and believed that Joseph Smith had nothing to do with it. In short, they blamed Brigham Young and apostacized from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. They rejected many of the doctrines as well, and took a wait and see posture towards salvation for the dead (temple), the Book of Abraham, and the Word of Wisdom (no coffee, alcohol, tobacco, etc.) They continued to use the Book of Mormon in their faith. Over a 100 years later, in 1990 the RLDS church had decided to fully join the ecumenical movement towards a common denominator among religions, and authorized 3000 women to receive their priesthood. |
| QUESTION from:JD Stone, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 50+, wrote on 4/22/1999: | |
| John 18.19-21 19 The high priest then asked Jesus of his disciples, and of his doctrine. 20 Jesus answered him, I spake openly to the world; I ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews always resort; and in secret have I said nothing. 21 Why askest thou me? ask them which heard me, what I have said unto them: behold, they know what I said. ***** Let's look at these statements: "in secret have I said nothing" and "they know what I said." ***** Luke 20:8 8 And Jesus said unto them, Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things. Matthew 9.30 30 And their eyes were opened; and Jesus straitly charged them, saying, See that no man know it. Matthew 13.10-11,13 10 And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables? 11 He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given. 13 Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand. John 20.8-9 8 Then went in also that other disciple, which came first to the sepulchre, and he saw, and believed. 9 For as yet they knew not the scripture, that he must rise again from the dead. John 6:66 66. From that time many of his disciples went back, and walked no more with him. John 7:5 5. For neither did his brethren believe in him. John 8:45 45. And because I tell you the truth, ye believe me not. Matthew 28.16-17 16 hen the eleven disciples went away into Galilee, into a mountain where Jesus had appointed them. 17 nd when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted. There is much more. But this should be sufficient to illustrate the point that Christ acted in "secret" even keeping things from his disciples as well as others. Was Yeshua honest when he answered "in secret have I said nothing" and "they know what I said?" --John | |
John:
Thanks for your comments. I too
have always found comfort in
merely looking to the life and
examples that Jesus Christ set,
when we are accused of something
"unorthodox." The fact is, Jesus
Christ was "unorthodox" to those
of his time, and received much
persecution because of it. I
believe that if more people would
truly study the personal sayings
and life of Jesus Christ, they
would have their eyes opened to
much greater things, not the least
of which is the need for Apostles
and Prophets, and current
revelation and scriptures such as
the Book of Mormon and Doctrine
and Covenants.
|
| QUESTION from:Mike Rodrigues, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 4/24/1999: | |
| I have learned in seminary that Christ will come again in the beginning of the 7th seal (i think it was)... so is this the 7th thousand years? Are we that close? My parents told me that they said the same things to them when they were youth... so if we're that close, why haven't we heard of or seen any of the signs, such as no rainbows for a year/month... or the 2 prophets slain in the streets of Jerusalem? I would greatly appreciate your help. | |
JST Matthew 24:41 Now learn a
parable of the fig tree: When its
branches are yet tender, and it
begins to put forth leaves, ye
know that summer is nigh at hand.
42 So likewise mine elect, when they shall see all these things, they shall know that he is near, even at the doors. 43 But of that day and hour no one knoweth; no, not the angels of God in heaven, but my Father only. 44 But as it was in the days of Noah, so it shall be also at the coming of the Son of man.font> The reason we haven't seen the signs that you speak of, such as the 2 prophets in Jerusalem, etc., is because they have NOT happened yet. Keep your eye on the prophet, and you can't miss it when it happens. When these signs happen we will truly know it is at the doors. "Close" is relative. "Close" in a 2000 year period could easily be 100-200 years!! We have no idea that things will happen at the Year 2000, say, and I would seriously doubt it because people would too easily expect that. He will come as a thief in the night. A more probable scenario would be several to many years after the Year 2000. There seems to be a type in the Book of Mormon about the 2nd coming of Christ. Indeed the Book of Revelation prophecies that a time will yet come that rejection of Christ and the worship of a false image of the beast will be commanded on all people. Revelation 13:15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. We see that this has not yet happened, but it will. The faithful will reject such rude commands and rather die first, or separate themselves (like at the New Jerusalem). In the Book of Mormon there was a time when the faithful were all going to be killed if they did not reject Christ. The wicked were disappointed in their demands, when Christ came through for the righteous' sake:
3 Nephi 1:4 And it came to pass
that in the commencement of the
ninety and second year, behold,
the prophecies of the prophets
began to be fulfilled more fully;
for there began to be greater
signs and greater miracles wrought
among the people.
5 But there were some who
began to say that the time was
past for the words to be
fulfilled, which were spoken by
Samuel, the Lamanite.
6 And they began to rejoice
over their brethren, saying:
Behold the time is past, and the
words of Samuel are not fulfilled;
therefore, your joy and your faith
concerning this thing hath been
vain.
7 And it came to pass that
they did make a great uproar
throughout the land; and the
people who believed began to be
very sorrowful, lest by any means
those things which had been spoken
might not come to pass.
8 But behold, they did watch
steadfastly for that day and that
night and that day which should be
as one day as if there were no
night, that they might know that
their faith had not been vain.
9 Now it came to pass that
there was a day set apart by the
unbelievers, that all those who
believed in those traditions
should be put to death except the
sign should come to pass, which
had been given by Samuel the
prophet.
10 Now it came to pass that
when Nephi, the son of Nephi, saw
this wickedness of his people, his
heart was exceedingly sorrowful.
11 And it came to pass that he
went out and bowed himself down
upon the earth, and cried mightily
to his God in behalf of his
people, yea, those who were about
to be destroyed because of their
faith in the tradition of their
fathers.
12 And it came to pass that he
cried mightily unto the Lord, all
that day; and behold, the voice of
the Lord came unto him, saying:
13 Lift up your head and be of
good cheer; for behold, the time
is at hand, and on this night
shall the sign be given, and on
the morrow come I into the world,
to show unto the world that I will
fulfil all that which I have
caused to be spoken by the mouth
of my holy prophets.
...and it happened as the Lord told Nephi. The wicked were silenced for a time. My parents tell me the same thing your parents told you. But we know that it is much nearer than when your parents thought it was near. We have the Year 2000 "logic" on our side... :) |
| QUESTION from:Kirt E. Stockwell, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 4/25/1999: | |
| In a brief survey of your site I read several questions from others asking about the lack of archaeological evidence of the Book of Mormon. Each answer seemed to deflect on the need or desireability of such evidence, stating that there basically was none, but that it shouldn't matter, as there was no evidence of The City of Enoch or the Garden of Eden. This was very disappointing to me because I have seen and read of much archaeological evidence of the Book of Mormon, including the Tree of Life stone, Temples, baptismal fonts, and much more. Why does your team seem intent on ignoring such information when answering questions? | |
Kirt:I am aware of these evidences, yet I do not believe that the intellectual approach of accepting the Book of Mormon is worth much. "Convince a man against his will, and he will remain of the same opinion still." It really depends on the heart, doesn't it? If people are receptive, and the Spirit supportive, share the information! I agree with that. Jesus taught in parables to protect rebellious people from being condemned too quickly, and only those who were spiritually in tune could understand his parables. If he taught openly, and "proved" his doctrines and teachings plainly to an unreceptive audience, they would stand condemned, because their hearts were not right. Jesus taught us that we are not to cast pearls before swine, indicating that there is a time and a place for sharing of spiritual things. If we take the Book of Mormon to the intellectual boxing ring, we have lost the whole match, because it can't be properly shared that way. People must come to the Lord on his terms, namely, with a broken heart and a contrite spirit. If the promise in Moroni is true, how can a person who has been convinced intellectually by proof, kneel down and thank his Lord for a conversion that never took place? Signs follow them that believe. Ether 4:18 Therefore, repent all ye ends of the earth, and come unto me, and believe in my gospel, and be baptized in my name; for he that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned; and signs shall follow them that believe in my name. It is by terms of repentance that people must come to the Lord. The signs of these Book of Mormon proofs that we now see, well, they work for us. But I do not see how they can work for those that are able to argue intellectually against them. Let us forget that method and stick with the basics of the doctrine of repentance. People need to humble themselves and repent because they love the Lord. That is the way that conversion takes place. That is why I downplay archeological evidences as a means to bring about conversion. I do not believe that it "converts" anyone. Intriguing information and proofs may convince, but conversion comes from the Holy Ghost and it is a miracle when it happens, not just a discovery experience. |
| QUESTION from:Sheldon Homer, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 4/25/1999: | |
| I am trying to find some sort of doctrine on when the spirit first enters the body. i have heard many different things. I've heard that the spirit comes and goes. I just would like some sort doctrine on the subject. Thanks | |
It has not been specifically
revealed. Yet we know that the
spirit is in the body in the womb
because of the leaping of John the
Baptist in Martha's womb upon the
nearing of the Lord Jesus in
Mary's womb. There was a spiritual
connection there as was
communicated in that New Testament
scripture. (see Luke 1:39-44)I give my opinion that it takes place immediately after conception, and this is why abortion is such a great sin. Abortion really affects the plan of salvation in an evil and negative way. President David O. McKay and his counselors officially taught: Abortion must be considered one of the most revolting and sinful practices in this day, when we are witnessing the frightening evidence of permissiveness leading to sexual immorality. |
| QUESTION from:Christina Crowell, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 4/26/1999: | |
| I am curious why Mormons believe everybody will have to accept our religion to enter into the Celestial Kingdom? What we are saying is every other religion is wrong and all the good works even Mother Theresa has done will be null and void until she accepts our religion in heaven? Isn't religion a stepping stone to god? Isn't God a loving and merciful God, would he really turn away someone because they were baptized in the Catholic church instead of the LDS? Do we really believe we are that much better & loved more than other people on the earth? | |
A better question would be "would
someone as good as Mother Theresa
be so rebellious that when given
the opportunity to accept the
ordinances of Jesus Christ, reject
them?" I don't think she will
reject Christ's ordinances.Recall that there is missionary work taking place in a major way in the Spirit World right now. It has been ever since the initial visit of Jesus Christ to the Spirits in Prison immediately after His death on the cross. (see 1 Peter 3:18-22, 4:6) A modern day prophet, Joseph F. Smith pondered on this scripture and received a revelation / vision, which is now recorded in the Doctrine and Covenants 138:
D&C 138:12 And there were gathered
together in one place an
innumerable company of the spirits
of the just, who had been faithful
in the testimony of Jesus while
they lived in mortality;
D&C 138:18 While this vast
multitude waited and conversed,
rejoicing in the hour of their
deliverance from the chains of
death, the Son of God appeared,
declaring liberty to the captives
who had been faithful;
D&C 138:30
30 But behold, from among the
righteous, he organized his forces
and appointed messengers, clothed
with power and authority, and
commissioned them to go forth and
carry the light of the gospel to
them that were in darkness, even
to all the spirits of men; and
thus was the gospel preached to
the dead.
D&C 138:32 Thus was the gospel
preached to those who had died in
their sins, without a knowledge of
the truth, or in transgression,
having rejected the prophets.
D&C 138:33 These were taught faith
in God, repentance from sin,
vicarious baptism for the
remission of sins, the gift of the
Holy Ghost by the laying on of
hands,
D&C 138:34 And all other
principles of the gospel that were
necessary for them to know in
order to qualify themselves that
they might be judged according to
men in the flesh, but live
according to God in the
spirit. God loves ALL of His children. We are His descendants. Of course He wants all to choose His way. But so few do choose His way. It is not because of God's lack of love for them, but because of their lack of love for Him. If they love Him, they find the right way eventually (even if in the Spirit World), and make it back to Him. He is fair. He leaves it up to our own choices. |
| QUESTION from:Dominic Cerra, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 4/27/1999: | |
| I notice that in the BOM and esp. in the Book of Abraham there are references to the "Gods". I know there is just one God but what is this in reference too? It is a difficut question esp. when my non-lds friends ask it. | |
The only reference to Gods in the
Book of Mormon is the reference to
the biblical account of Adam and
Eve:Alma 12:31 Wherefore, he gave commandments unto men, they having first transgressed the first commandments as to things which were temporal, and becoming as Gods, knowing good from evil, placing themselves in a state to act, or being placed in a state to act according to their wills and pleasures, whether to do evil or to do good-- (see Gen 3:22)It should not be so strange an idea to anyone who believes in the Bible that there is more than one being as God. In Genesis where it speaks of the creation, God uses a plural pronoun in reference to Himself: Us. He says: Genesis 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: This is such a powerful doctrine, and truth. Yet so many pass it over as if not to even comprehend it. But just think about it! We are man and are made in the image of Them! God (Elohim) is a plural noun in our Bible. We know of God the Father, Jesus Christ His Son, and the Holy Ghost. There are three that rule over us. Are there more? Reason tells me yes! Even so, the Bible hints at it with all of these plural pronouns. Elohim, the Hebrew word for God used in our Bibles, is a plural pronoun. |
| QUESTION from:Mike Horn, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 4/28/1999: | |
| When did Brigham Young declare the Word of Wisdom to be a commandment? | |
When the Word of Wisdom was first
given through Joseph Smith, it was
not a commandment, but a greeting,
a word of wisdom from the Lord
(see D&C 89:2)Brigham Young later was instructed of the Lord to make this revelation a commandment (September 9, 1851). |
| QUESTION from:Scott Baker, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 4/29/1999: | |
| Who is Moroni talking to in Mormon 8:37-39 when he asks 38 ...why have ye polluted the holy church of God? ... Does this refer to the saints in general or the leaders of the Church, or both? If this is refering to us what are the implications? Are we in a state of apostacy? Do the other warning to the "gentiles" in the BOM also refer to the Latter Day Saints? | |
This passage in the Book of Mormon
is referring to the general
population of Gentiles in the day
that the Book of Mormon record
would come forth. It is a prophecy
of the kind of people and
conditions that would exist in the
days of Joseph Smith. Some
occasionally have supposed that
this scripture pertains to the
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-
day Saints, and to the extent that
pride exists in the heart of any
person or people, this is true,
but the statement was applicable
before
the Church was even organized.
Recall that Joseph Smith
translated the Book of Mormon
Mormon 8:26 And no one need say
they shall not come, for they
surely shall, for the Lord hath
spoken it; for out of the earth
shall they come, by the hand of
the Lord, and none can stay it;
and it shall come in a day when it
shall be said that miracles are
done away; and it shall come even
as if one should speak from the
dead.
27 And it shall come in a day when the blood of saints shall cry unto the Lord, because of secret combinations and the works of darkness. 28 Yea, it shall come in a day when the power of God shall be denied, and churches become defiled and be lifted up in the pride of their hearts; yea, even in a day when leaders of churches and teachers shall rise in the pride of their hearts, even to the envying of them who belong to their churches. 29 Yea, it shall come in a day when there shall be heard of fires, and tempests, and vapors of smoke in foreign lands; 30 And there shall also be heard of wars, rumors of wars, and earthquakes in divers places. 31 Yea, it shall come in a day when there shall be great pollutions upon the face of the earth; there shall be murders, and robbing, and lying, and deceivings, and whoredoms, and all manner of abominations; when there shall be many who will say, Do this, or do that, and it mattereth not, for the Lord will uphold such at the last day. But wo unto such for they are in the gall of bitterness and in the bonds of iniquity. 32 Yea, it shall come in a day when there shall be churches built up that shall say: Come unto me, and for your money you shall be forgiven of your sins. 33 O ye wicked and perverse and stiffnecked people, why have ye built up churches unto yourselves to get gain? Why have ye transfigured the holy word of God, that ye might bring damnation upon your souls? Behold, look ye unto the revelations of God; for behold, the time cometh at that day when all these things must be fulfilled. 34 Behold, the Lord hath shown unto me great and marvelous things concerning that which must shortly come, at that day when these things shall come forth among you. 35 Behold, I speak unto you as if ye were present, and yet ye are not. But behold, Jesus Christ hath shown you unto me, and I know your doing. 36 And I know that ye do walk in the pride of your hearts; and there are none save a few only who do not lift themselves up in the pride of their hearts, unto the wearing of very fine apparel, unto envying, and strifes, and malice, and persecutions, and all manner of iniquities; and your churches, yea, even every one, have become polluted because of the pride of your hearts. 37 For behold, ye do love money, and your substance, and your fine apparel, and the adorning of your churches, more than ye love the poor and the needy, the sick and the afflicted. 38 O ye pollutions, ye hypocrites, ye teachers, who sell yourselves for that which will canker, why have ye polluted the holy church of God? Why are ye ashamed to take upon you the name of Christ? Why do ye not think that greater is the value of an endless happiness than that misery which never dies--because of the praise of the world? This scripture applies to anyone who is guilty of these things. Pride. Costly apparel. Lavish things and places. True, some are guilty of this kind of thing, and show their true love of things worldly, but most of the people I know in the Church are not guilty of this, and more especially the Apostles and Prophets. |
| QUESTION from:Scott Baker, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 4/29/1999: | |
| I have searched through the scriptures in an attempt to find where it says the the Prophet will NEVER lead the church astray. I have not been able to find it. Can you tell me when this was first taught to the saints and who taught it? Also is there any scriptual backing for such a teaching? Thanks. | |
The Lord taught it implicitly in
one of the early D&C revelations.
The prophet Ezra Taft Benson has
taught:
On the day the Church was
organized, the Lord gave a
revelation, too often overlooked,
that he expects members of the
Church to "give
heed unto all his words and
commandments which" the Prophet
and President "shall give unto you
as he receiveth them, walking in
all holiness before me;
I remember many
years ago, when I was a boy,
hearing President Young state in
Provo, where I lived, something
like this: "Some people may think
I am not leading the Church
aright. Now, I will tell you how
you may know when I do not lead
the Church aright. The Lord will
just nip my wind; for He will
never allow any man to lead this
Church astray." I have had a great
deal of confidence in that saying,
and I have not been the least
alarmed in regard to the leading
of this Church. I know it is the
Church of Christ; I know that
Joseph Smith was a prophet; and I
know, if we live according to the
requirements of the Gospel, we
will be saved and exalted.
|
| QUESTION from:Jason David Glancy, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 4/30/1999: | |
| Regarding Record #2599 - I was also faced with the question of Joseph Smith marrying living men's wives by a colleage well-versed in anti-mormon literature. He (made a mistake and) gave me the references from LDS books. In particular he accused Joseph Smith of marrying Heber C. Kimball's wife Vilate. After reading _Life_of_Heber_C._Kimball_(also see _The_Work_and_Glory_ Vol.6), I found out that Joseph tested Heber by commanding him to give his wife to Joseph. When Heber brought Vilate to Joseph, Joseph wept, said,"You passed!", then sealed (married for eternity) Heber to Vilate. This particular claim is false! I also read in John A. Widstoe's _Evidences_and_Reconciliations_ that living men's wives were sealed to Joseph Smith, Jr. - both before and after his death - , but only for eternity and NOT for time! The prophet never lived with them or consemated the marriage. This evidence convinced me there was no reason to look up the other references. The twisted lies will not stand in the light of Truth. God has revealed to me that Joseph Smith is His prophet and this is His church. I hope this helps. | |
Thanks Jason! I appreciate your
second witness on that matter of
the many falsehoods that are
spread about Joseph Smith. He
died a true prophet, and I know
that with all my heart.
|
| QUESTION from:, Non-Denominational Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 4/30/1999: | |
| do you believe that Jesus Christ is God? | |
Yes we do. He is a member of the
Godhead. He is the Son of God.
2 Nephi 25:19 For according to the
words of the prophets, the Messiah
cometh in six hundred years from
the time that my father left
Jerusalem; and according to the
words of the prophets, and also
the word of the angel of God, his
name shall be Jesus Christ, the
Son of God.
2 Nephi 25:20 And now, my
brethren, I have spoken plainly
that ye cannot err. And as the
Lord God liveth that brought
Israel up out of the land of
Egypt, and gave unto Moses power
that he should heal the nations
after they had been bitten by the
poisonous serpents, if they would
cast their eyes unto the serpent
which he did raise up before them,
and also gave him power that he
should smite the rock and the
water should come forth; yea,
behold I say unto you, that as
these things are true, and as the
Lord God liveth, there is none
other name given under heaven save
it be this Jesus Christ, of which
I have spoken, whereby man can be
saved. |
| QUESTION from:Jacob Fox, Born Again Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 5/1/1999: | |
| Latter Day Saints claim that Ezekiel 37:19 refers to the Book of Mormon and the Bible. It says, "Say to them, 'This is what the Sovereign Lord says: I am going to take the stick of Joseph--which is in Ephraim's hand--and of the Israelite tribes associated with him, and join it to Judah's stick, making them a single stick of wood, and they will become one in my hand." My question is this: Is this the right interpretation? NOTE: 1. Scrolls are not rolled up on one stick--not ever. Every single scroll ever used by anyone on the face of the planet that is long enough to contain a significant work (like the book of Ezekiel, or certainly the entire Old Testament) uses two scroll- sticks. So if we were talking about scrolls, we'd have to be talking about 4 sticks, not two. 2. The book of Mormon was written on gold plates, not a scroll. 3. Ezekiel clearly explains what he is talking about in verses 20-28, and it has nothing to do with the Book of Mormon. It has to do with the re-gathering of Israel within a context where tribal distinctions are no longer important or known about. This is fulfilled, by the way, in these modern times with the re- settlement of Jews in Palestine and the rise of Zionism). This return of Israel is what he speaks of, and the coming of the Messiah, as indicated, will be soon ("My servant David will be king over them, and they will all have one shepherd... I will make a covenant of peace with them; it will be an everlasting covenant... when my sanctuary is among them forever"). | |
You know, I've heard this argument
before, and it just does not ring
true, especially the way that you
have presented it. You skipped
verse 16 which specifically refers
to writings upon these "sticks,"
indicating that a scriptural
record is to be the means of
bringing Israel together again.Ezekiel 37:16 Moreover, thou son of man, take thee one stick, and write upon it, For Judah, and for the children of Israel his companions: then take another stick, and write upon it, For Joseph, the stick of Ephraim, and [for] all the house of Israel his companions: when Ezekiel spoke of "sticks" (probably waxed writing boards), he was illustrating the instruments by which God would bring peoples together in the latter days, just as he used the concept of the Resurrection to illustrate the gathering of God's people, which is the theme of chapters 34-37. Just as bodies are reconstituted in the Resurrection, so will Israel be reconstituted in the gathering; and the formerly divided nations will become one (Ezek. 37:1-14). Thus, the publication of the Book of Mormon in 1830 was a sign that the divided tribes of Israel were to become one under God and that God's latter-day work was beginning to be implemented (Ezek. 37:21-28; cf. 1 Ne. 13:34-41; 3 Ne. 20:46-21:11). |
| QUESTION from:shannon, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 5/1/1999: | |
| I hope you can help me .. I have been having a lot of dreams about God and then now i have dreams that the devil is trying to send me a message they really scare me and in my sleep i have woken up yelling in the name of jesus christ satan leave. Why is this happing to me . I dont go looking for trouble i have been having some problems but nothing to where i should leave the church .. i was thinking of talking to my bishop but he will think i am a freak .. please tell me what to do.. i know this a weird request but any help will help | |
Well, the two things that you are
having dreams about are very
real. God the Father lives, and
Lucifer whom He cast out of heaven
along with a third part of the
hosts of heaven, they are all real
spirits and exist in this world.
God the Father is far superior to
them, and has power over them.
They are still subject to Him.
That is why whey we pray in the
name of Jesus Christ, His Son,
that we get results.As a youth, I was troubled by them from time to time, even Joseph Smith was troubled by them at the time when he was about to pray to God.
Joseph Smith History 1:15 After I
had retired to the place where I
had previously designed to go,
having looked around me, and
finding myself alone, I kneeled
down and began to offer up the
desires of my heart to God. I had
scarcely done so, when immediately
I was seized upon by some power
which entirely overcame me, and
had such an astonishing influence
over me as to bind my tongue so
that I could not speak. Thick
darkness gathered around me, and
it seemed to me for a time as if I
were doomed to sudden destruction.
16 But, exerting all my powers
to call upon God to deliver me out
of the power of this enemy which
had seized upon me, and at the
very moment when I was ready to
sink into despair and abandon
myself to destruction--not to an
imaginary ruin, but to the power
of some actual being from the
unseen world, who had such
marvelous power as I had never
before felt in any being--just at
this moment of great alarm, I saw
a pillar of light exactly over my
head, above the brightness of the
sun, which descended gradually
until it fell upon me.
17 It no sooner appeared than
I found myself delivered from the
enemy which held me bound. When
the light rested upon me I saw two
Personages, whose brightness and
glory defy all description,
standing above me in the air. One
of them spake unto me, calling me
by name and said, pointing to the
other--This is My Beloved Son.
Hear Him! And so we see how satan tried to scare Joseph Smith away from praying to God. They obviously knew who he was and tried to thwart him. But Joseph had faith and exerted all his powers to call upon God for help. He was delivered. Your Bishop can help you tremendously. He can give you a priesthood blessing. He can counsel you in the revelation of his calling. If your faith is strong, call upon God in the name of Jesus Christ for deliverance from this trouble. If you faith is weak, get the assistance of another, like your Bishop, who is strong in the faith and can use the priesthood in your behalf. You need not be troubled by the one who was cast out for rebellion anymore. Increase your faith through reading of the Book of Mormon and other scriptures, and you will find strength in Jesus Christ sufficient to be troubled no more by these "scary" things. With Jesus Christ as the center of your life, these other influences decrease dramatically and they have less and less power over you. Indeed, this will be the condition of a people who are ready to meet Jesus Christ when He comes again soon. |
| QUESTION from:Rob Tolley, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 5/1/1999: | |
| Do you ever wonder things like, who decided god would be the ruler of the entire universe(who made god the almighty). It is things like this that make me question if there is even a god. There obviously has to be some being or a group of beings that created this planet, but as far as one single individual I have a hard time with believing that. I was raised in the church until i was about 12 years old and know that if you live your life to the things that they tell you not to do it will obviously help you live a happier life but in order to live like that you have to believe the teachings and I try praying I don't get any warm feeling or here a voice in my head. I am not saying that the teachings are not true or that they are true or even if there is a "GOD", knowbody knows until they are physically . If you have anything that will prove me wrong (something that is hard evidence, not takin by faith and hope alone respond to this letter) other than the book of mormon or the bible because I have read a lot of books and if I beleived everything I read I would be a crazy person by now. looking forward to your reply!!!!! | |
Yes, I have wondered those
questions. I don't know the
answers to them, however, and I
believe that we will know them in
the future when God tells them to
us (if He did not already in the
Pre-Mortal Existence).There is no need to question His existence just because we can't understand His origins. His existence is proven by the very existence of this world, etc. The Book of Mormon prophet Alma was confronted with an individual, Korihor, who rationalized that there was no God, and he told Korihor this: Alma 30:44 ...ye have the testimony of all these thy brethren, and also all the holy prophets? The scriptures are laid before thee, yea, and all things denote there is a God; yea, even the earth, and all things that are upon the face of it, yea, and its motion, yea, and also all the planets which move in their regular form do witness that there is a Supreme Creator. We know from the scriptures that God created this world through His Son, Jesus Christ. (see Ephesians 3:9) But Jesus Christ had help. Who helped? Abraham 4 has an account of the creation of this world, in which it says Abraham 4:1 AND then the Lord said: Let us go down. And they went down at the beginning, and they, that is the Gods, organized and formed the heavens and the earth. Jesus Christ brought others with Him to organize and create the world. There will come a time when all these things shall be made known in all their details. It is the near future.
D&C 121:28 A time to come in the
which nothing shall be withheld,
whether there be one God or many
gods, they shall be manifest.
|
| QUESTION from:Scott Baker, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 5/3/1999: | |
| The BOM talks a lot about being born of the spirit, being baptised by fire and the holy ghost, receiving the mighty change of heart? Each time this "ordinance" is received by someone in the BOM it is given as a spectacular event, yet we seldom if ever are taugh about this in the church. why? The few times I have heard it mentioned it is taught that a spectacular event is rare and is the exception, that the "usual" way people receive the mighty change of heart is very gradual and slow --throughout a lifetime. If this is true where in the BOM is there an example of the baptism of fire, the mighty change, being administered in this slow gradual way? It seems in every case I can find it is an extra ordinary event, and although the recipient may not know what has happened to them, they do know something very powerful did happen. Is there really a scriptual basis for the common LDS teaching of the "slow and gradual over a life time" might change, or baptism of fire? It seems to me that such a slow gradual change would not qualify as a "mighty change"? Why isn't this foundation BOM doctrine taught much more powerfully from the brethren? Doesn't Nephi say that this baptism of fire is essential to get on the path to God? If there are so few that have received such a mighty experience, perhaps there are very few "saints" who are truly through the "gate" of the two baptisms? Is this correct? | |
Do you remember the story of Enoch
the great prophet, whose city and
people were eventually translated
into heaven? It was not a single
spectacular event that prepared
this people for translation. It
took time. First, it was Enoch
alone-except for his heavenly
helpers. Then a handful of humans
joined him. Soon there was a
colony. Then a city!God preserved and prepared Enoch's people in the midst of awful and enveloping evil, and, reassuringly, he has promised his people in our own time that though "great tribulations shall be among the children of men, ... my people will I preserve. (Moses 7:6].) (Neal A. Maxwell, Of One Heart, p.6)It was centuries later that Sodom was destroyed by fire and brimstone. And so we see that these things take time. In our own day we are counseled by the Brethren to do everything necessary to become converted. Whether or not this is a spectacular event or not is a function of our own faith. Miracles still happen today, and I would say that if all the revelations and visions of the faithful people in the church were published today, that it would be overwhelming and "spectacular." The reason we do not hear so much about them, is that these sacred things are not to be noised about (casting pearls before swine, as Jesus taught) except under the most sacred circumstances.
The Book of Mormon teaches that
conversion takes place over time.
A mighty change of heart is a
function of our own faith. Alma 5:12 And
according to his faith there was a
mighty change wrought in his
heart. Behold I say unto you that
this is all true. Do the Brethren of the Church teach this today? Yes they do. All we need to do is go to the www.lds.org web site, and search through the General Conference proceedings and read what they have been teaching even this past year!
The following Apostles and
Prophets have taught us concerning
the importance of getting this
mighty change of heart:
President Hinckley said to us: |
| QUESTION from:Rodney J. McGuire, Non-Denominational Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 5/3/1999: | |
| In the BofM or the Bible, Jesus Christ never hints as to it being necessary to be endowed or married forever to gain supreme salvation, yet these two principles are central LDS doctrine. How do you reconcile this inconsistency, after all, isn't the BofM supposed to get you nearer to God than any other book. It seems one must refer to other books to find the essentials to salvation, ie;The D&C. Thank you for your time. | |
The Book of Mormon testifies of
Jesus Christ in so many ways. It
truly will get one closer to God
by reading it than will any other
book. There are numerous
references to Jesus Christ in this
wonderful book, compiled
specifically for our day by
ancient prophets inspired of
God.Many of the details pertaining to ordinances and the temple, etc. are not contained in the scriptures. For example, can we find the details pertaining to the many different things that were done in the temples at the time of Jesus, ...can we find these things directly in our New Testament? The reason we can not, is because the purpose of the writings of the prophets who wrote the New Testament was to communicate other things, such as the good news of Jesus Christ being our Lord and Savior. The Book of Mormon communicates many things but does not contain the specifics of the temple, eternal marriage, and many other doctrines. We look to the whole of scripture and not just a part. These details you mention are contained in other modern revelations such as the Doctrine and Covenants. Some important details are not contained in the canonized scriptures at all, such as the temple ordinances and ceremony, etc. We do not present the Book of Mormon as the end all / be all book. It is a part of the whole. |
| QUESTION from:Rodney J McGuire, Non-Denominational Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 5/4/1999: | |
| Perhaps there is no appropriate answer to my question from yesterday, in a Mormon perspective. Being non Mormon, I find you answer illogical. Joseph Smith said that the BofM would get you nearer to God than ANY OTHER BOOK. So to turn around and say that I must refer to OTHER BOOKS for essential salvational issues is contradictory. I see only two possiblities. One, if J. Smith is correct than those doctrines not even mentioned in the BofM are wrong and consequently the LDS church is wrong. Second, if J. Smith is wrong, than again the LDS church is wrong. The facts as you've explained previously show me that you must (in your faith) draw from works other than the BofM to have a complete knowledge of ESSENTIAL Mormon doctrine. I'm not talking inconsequential doctrine. The Temple is a central point in the Mormon doctrines of salvation, yet, Christ never mentions its' necessity, even in passing(In the BofM or Bible). How do you possibly reconcile this inconsistency? | |
You are suggesting that Joseph
Smith taught us to only read the
Book of Mormon, and that is all we
need. That is not the case.
Joseph Smith read the Bible to get
the idea to pray to God to know
which church to join, and it was
James 1:5 that inspired him.
Indeed, in 1843 just before he
died, he was still teaching from
the Bible, disproving that which
you have suggested (Teachings of
the Prophet Joseph Smith, Section
Six 1843-44)Certainly he was not advocating that we only read the Book of Mormon, indeed, he worked on a retranslation of the Bible AFTER the Book of Mormon translation. He knew of the importance of all scripture. He also knew as I knew the continuing principle of revelation. God has always spoken to mankind through prophets (Amos 3:7). It will never stop unless there is no faith in the world. But it continues today. Who knows, but the revelations that the prophets of today receive will also become a book of canonized scripture to some future generations? I believe they will, just as these ancient revelations we have now which have stood the test of time have become our scriptures today. We believe all that God has revealed, all that He does now reveal, and we believe that He will yet reveal many great and important things pertaining to the Kingdom of God. (Articles of Faith 9) It is important to note that Doctrines can be revealed to mankind through a prophet of God, and yet NOT be in the canonized scripture. Indeed, when Jesus Christ taught His doctrines anew to the people of His day, it was not in any canon of scripture. It was new. Any prophet of ancient time was under the same condition. They taught the truths that God revealed to them, and certainly wrote it down, and eventually, much of this found its way into future canons of scripture. Today, the revelations received are no different. It may take long time before particular revelations find there way into the official canon. Yet, they are still scripture to us, and the temple ceremony and ordinances are no different. |
| QUESTION from:Elder Aaron M. Hackett, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 5/5/1999: | |
| I am a missionary serving in Brazil. Many of our investigators have questions about how the ancient indians of South and Central America relate to the Book of Mormon. Where can I find scientific facts and religious facts on how they relate? | |
There is too much lively
discussion on the matter to come
to any certain scientific
conclusion, and so it is left to
the personal interpretations and
opinions of the individual. The
modern organization FARMS has
educated themselves into believing
(for the most part) that the whole
of Book of Mormon activity took
place in Central America. I have
my own personal beliefs, and they
differ from the theories put forth
by the primarily intellectual
FARMS community. I agree with the
early statements of Joseph Smith
and early Apostles who spoke on
the matter. They were not ignorant
men, and I believe like they do,
not because they believed it, but
because I believe it indeed to be
true, that the whole American
continent was populated by peoples
who lived in Book of Mormon times,
and that the last battle was
indeed in New York at the Hill
Cumorah. To believe otherwise is
to pooh pooh many of the
statements of real prophets. The
many statements of the early
prophets who spoke on the matter
cause spiritual stirrings within
me, that I know they are true. FARMS staff views, in my way of thinking, can not possibly begin to equate with the views of Apostles who were the Lord's conduits for revelation. It is better, in my view, to believe the prophets and the Spirit rather than to rationalize them away with our thinking. Pondering yields truth by the power of the Spirit. Truth is truth, and the Spirit witnesses to it. |
| QUESTION from:Karen Cadle, Born Again Christian, Age 50+, wrote on 5/5/1999: | |
| 1. Where in the BIBLE does it say that Jesus is the brother of Satan? 2. Is it true that the Book of Mormon has gone through many revisions? I am speaking in particular to a 1930 version have prophecies in it that are not included in the current day publication of BOM, because the propecy has not come true. I seek to understand, and am investigating your church. I ask in a pure heart. Thank you. Karen | |
Revelation 12:7 And there was war
in heaven: Michael and his angels
fought against the dragon; and the
dragon fought and his angels,
8 And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven. 9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. The first question is, what were these doing in heaven, who once had a place there (...neither was their place found any more in heaven...) ? They were the family of God, and they rebelled against God, and were judged and cast out, just like we will be judged and "cast out" after this life if we rebel against the Lord in this the time of our probation.
1 Nephi 10:21 Wherefore, if ye
have sought to do wickedly in the
days of your probation, then ye
are found unclean before the
judgment-seat of God; and no
unclean thing can dwell with God;
wherefore, ye must be cast off
forever.
Alma 42:4 And thus we see, that
there was a time granted unto man
to repent, yea, a probationary
time, a time to repent and serve
God.
Alma 34:31 Yea, I would that ye
would come forth and harden not
your hearts any longer; for
behold, now is the time and the
day of your salvation; and
therefore, if ye will repent and
harden not your hearts,
immediately shall the great plan
of redemption be brought about
unto you.
The Book of Mormon has not changed. It has been enhanced with footnotes, chapter and verse numbers, and minor text corrections compatible to the original manuscript and the revelation of God. You have heard a false rumor, about some prophecy being removed because it did not come to pass. |
| QUESTION from:Spencer Mac, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 5/6/1999: | |
| Exactly when did Jesus Christ organize the Church on the earth? Was it during his ministry, or did he first have to complete the atonement? A friend recently pointed out that the Church mentioned in Mosiah 18 (along with the term "Christians" in Alma) predates the Savior's ministry. Also, was the organization of the Church as a distinct entity an evolutionary process or an event? Thanks. | |
Before the church that Jesus
Christ personally set up in the
meridian of time, there were
Christian churches practicing the
Law of Moses. We have the BOok of
Mormon record which states plainly
that Captain Moroni was a
Christian defending the cause of
Christians on the land of
America. Surely they knew of
Jesus Christ and worshipped Him
even before He was born. Angels
had revealed the plan of salvation
to the prophets of their day, and
they knew why they practiced the
Law of Moses: to point them to
Christ.In the thousands of years that predated Jesus Christ, the prophets knew of Him. The prophet Ether in the Jaredite nation knew of Him, and wrote: Ether 2:12 Behold, [America]is a choice land, and whatsoever nation shall possess it shall be free from bondage, and from captivity, and from all other nations under heaven, if they will but serve the God of the land, who is Jesus Christ, who hath been manifested by the things which we have written. What this means, is that the Church of Jesus Christ was in existence even before He was born to this earth. The churches that pre-date the one that Christ set up personally with Apostles, were led by a prophet who had the help of others. The Book of Mormon identifies some of these as High Priests: Alma 46:6 Thus they were led away by Amalickiah to dissensions, notwithstanding the preaching of Helaman (the prophet) and his brethren, yea, notwithstanding their exceedingly great care over the church, for they were high priests over the church. |
| QUESTION from:Sheri Bell, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 5/6/1999: | |
| Hi Answerman!, I had a comment about question # 2806 from Jacob Fox. the question talked about the "sticks" that represented the two peoples coming together. In those times they used to write genealogys on literal sticks. More like staffs. they would carve whole family histories on them. So when it talks about sticks, it not only is symbolic , but literal. Thanks so much for the good work. | |
Hi Sheri:That is an interesting side note! The bottom line, is that Ezekiel is referring to two different written records being brought together for the purpose of gathering together the House of Israel, a process that has already taken place and which is currently taking place, respectively. Great to hear from you. |
| QUESTION from:Erica B., Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 5/9/1999: | |
| I was just wondering why we have to be sealed in the temple to gain exaltation when Jesus, at least, not to my knowledge, ever got married. I don't know many things about the church because I'm the only member in my family and I've only been a member for 1 and 1/2 years. Thanks. | |
Erica:Jesus was most definitely married, as were all other contemporary ecclesiastical leaders in Jerusalem. It is also one of the requirements of exaltation as defined in D&C 132 which Jesus Christ revealed to Joseph Smith. And we know that Jesus is now exalted and glorified with a body of flesh and bone! There was a temple in the days of Jesus Christ, and we know that it was a sacred place, because He drove out the money changers and thieves from the entry ways, and called it the "house of my Father." We don't know a lot of the details about the temple from the New Testament, do we? This absence of information is no different today: the temple ordinances and ceremony, etc. are not contained in the canon of scripture. Why not? Because they are sacred and not for the general use of the church or world. They are reserved for the temple only. It has always been so. Many have taken this absence of information, including the marriage of Jesus Christ, as doctrine that there is no marriage in heaven, etc. But we know that there is, because it is explicitly revealed through the prophets that Jesus Christ has called today, beginning with Joseph Smith. There are temple ordinances done for both the living and those who have passed on to the Spirit World, who await their resurrection and temple ordinances...ordinances which they can not do themselves, but which are done vicariously for them in the temples of God by mortals who can do them. |
| QUESTION from:nat f john, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 5/10/1999: | |
| if you repent for looking at x rated material can you still go on a mission? | |
If one truly repents, then the sin
will be forgiven, right? So this
question has to do with
repentance. Ask the Lord to help
us with our weaknesses, and He
will turn them into our
strengths. The most important
thing one can do when they have
viewed pornography, is to work
diligently towards greater
spirituality. Satan won't stop
tempting us, ever. He will
continue to prey on our
weaknesses, so if we were weak
enough to view this stuff in the
first place, we see that there is
a need to get more spiritual
strength. He will give it to us if
we specifically ask Him. In the
Book of Mormon the Lord states:Ether 12:27 And if men come unto me I will show unto them their weakness. I give unto men weakness that they may be humble; and my grace is sufficient for all men that humble themselves before me; for if they humble themselves before me, and have faith in me, then will I make weak things become strong unto them. So we need to come unto Him. Pray and kneel in humble prayer, on a very regular basis. Make it a part of our lives, change our lives to accommodate this behavior, make time for it, pray always. Acknowledge our weaknesses before Him. Ask Him to make these weaknesses our strengths, and He will! |
| QUESTION from:Michael Rodrigues, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 5/10/1999: | |
| I heard there will be more scriptures coming forth in the modern day... is that true? Will the world ever be that ready? Many don't believe in the BOM now, so why would our Heavenly father give more? thanks | |
Yes, there is a major part of the
Book of Mormon that is yet to come
forth, as well as the other
scriptures from the Lost Tribes of
Israel. The world will be most
definitely ready after the coming
of Christ. He will get the world
ready when He comes again. It
will be burned as you may know...
2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up. The earth will most definitely be ready at that day, when satan will be bound.
2 Nephi 29:13 And it shall come to
pass that the Jews shall have the
words of the Nephites, and the
Nephites shall have the words of
the Jews; and the Nephites and the
Jews shall have the words of the
lost tribes of Israel; and the
lost tribes of Israel shall have
the words of the Nephites and the
Jews.
14 And it shall come to pass
that my people, which are of the
house of Israel, shall be gathered
home unto the lands of their
possessions; and my word also
shall be gathered in one. And I
will show unto them that fight
against my word and against my
people, who are of the house of
Israel, that I am God, and that I
covenanted with Abraham that I
would remember his seed
forever. Many even in the Church have rested the Book of Mormon, and do not study it, and do not give heed to the many teachings and warnings contained in it.
D&C 84:54 And your minds in times
past have been darkened because of
unbelief, and because you have
treated lightly the things you
have received--
55 Which vanity and unbelief
have brought the whole church
under condemnation.
56 And this condemnation
resteth upon the children of Zion,
even all.
57 And they shall remain under
this condemnation until they
repent and remember the new
covenant, even the Book of Mormon
and the former commandments which
I have given them, not only to
say, but to do according to that
which I have written-- |
| QUESTION from:Michael Rodrigues, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 5/10/1999: | |
| My friend has just told me she is interested in our religion... I don't want to overwhelm her with too much! What can I start with? I think she would rather learn from me than from missionaries, especially since I only see her at school. Should I give her a BOM, or what? Help! Thanks... | |
I believe that the Book of Mormon
is just about the best place to
start. If people read this
powerful and wonderful book, they
will see that the hand of God was
in the preparation of it. They
will know that He works through
living prophets to communicate to
His people, and they will see the
gospel in action in the lives of
the many individuals in the Book
of Mormon era. Jesus Christ
lives, and these good ancient
Americans knew about Him even
before he was born to the earth.
The ancient Americans, the
Nephites and Lamanites, were
called Christians, and it seems to
me that anyone who believes in
Jesus Christ would be extremely
interested in this book of books.
|
| QUESTION from:David Ogden, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 5/12/1999: | |
| I think I have a pretty good understanding of the godhead/trinity but I honestly don't under stand or can't follow Abinadi's sermon on Christ being both the father and the son. I know the Book of Mormon to be true so I hope you can help me follow this confusing chapter (Mosiah 15) Thanks | |
Mosiah 15:1 AND now Abinadi said
unto them: I would that ye should
understand that God himself shall
come down among the children of
men, and shall redeem his people.
2 And because he dwelleth in flesh he shall be called the Son of God, and having subjected the flesh to the will of the Father, being the Father and the Son-- 3 The Father, because he was conceived by the power of God; and the Son, because of the flesh; thus becoming the Father and Son-- 4 And they are one God, yea, the very Eternal Father of heaven and of earth. 5 And thus the flesh becoming subject to the Spirit, or the Son to the Father, being one God, suffereth temptation, and yieldeth not to the temptation, but suffereth himself to be mocked, and scourged, and cast out, and disowned by his people. 6 And after all this, after working many mighty miracles among the children of men, he shall be led, yea, even as Isaiah said, as a sheep before the shearer is dumb, so he opened not his mouth. 7 Yea, even so he shall be led, crucified, and slain, the flesh becoming subject even unto death, the will of the Son being swallowed up in the will of the Father. One of the reasons that Jesus Christ was the Father, was because He did the will of the Father, always. That makes Him represent His Father very perfectly. When we accept Christ and follow Him into the waters of baptism, we become the children of Christ, and take upon us His name. That makes Him our Father too. He was the Son of God, as Abinadi says, because of the Flesh. He already had God status before He was born, because Jesus Christ, as a spirit, created this earth under the direction of His Father. He is God because of His status in the Godhood, where there are three, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. Three beings acting as one. |
| QUESTION from:Eric Jeide, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 5/12/1999: | |
| My parents and I were talking about Moses and came up with this question. Moses is carrying a staff in the wilderness. The staff head is a serpent. This drove the poisonous snakes and saves lives. My dad was talking with an institute teacher and he said the serpent represented JESUS CHRIST. He also said he didn't know WHY..but that that was the case. Please help my family and I with this question. I would appreciate an answer soon if you know of one. If not...maybe you know HOW I can find this answer. Thanks a bunch. | |
If I were to come up with a reason
why a snake was used, I would say
because it was very relevant to
the problem at hand. We have many
symbols representing Christ: A
cross, nails, the bread and water
of sacrament, fish, sacrifice of
lambs, first-born, alter, blood,
etc. Most of the basic symbolical
representations tie into him and
his atoning sacrifice. It is not so much WHAT the symbol is, as much as the Lord chose it. It represents the Son of God, and many of these symbols such as cross, blood, sacrifice could be repulsive objects if we did not understand the great love of God and His Son for us, and these things help the faithful remember Him / Them. The brazen snake that Moses raised up was taught to them by Moses to represent Christ. And so it was.
Alma 33:18 But behold, this is not
all; these are not the only ones
who have spoken concerning the Son
of God.
19 Behold, he was spoken of by
Moses; yea, and behold a type was
raised up in the wilderness, that
whosoever would look upon it might
live. And many did look and live.
20 But few understood the
meaning of those things, and this
because of the hardness of their
hearts. But there were many who
were so hardened that |