| QUESTION from:Ashley Warren, Baptist Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 9/29/2000: | |
| How can you say the Book of Mormon is an additon of the Bible when it clearly states in Revelations 22:18 or 19 that anyone who adds or takes away from the Book of Life will be cast into Hell? It is not possible for someone to add to the Bible. The Book of Mormon is NOT another additon to the Bible. | |
Ashley, you are right, it is NOT
an addition to the Bible. But it
is another testament or witness of
Christ. Think on how sad it would
be if your friend knew of Christ,
testified of Christ, and yet you
were not allowed to ever speak and
testify of Christ...that could not
be right.The Nephite and Lamanite nation had believers in Christ, and they too prophesied and preached and testified of Him! Nephi said, nearly 600 years before Jesus Christ was even born into the world: 2 Ne. 25: 26 And we talk of Christ, we rejoice in Christ, we preach of Christ, we prophesy of Christ, and we write according to our prophecies, that our children may know to what source they may look for a remission of their sins. The Book of Mormon does not "add" to the Bible, it is a completely independent record, and nothing in the Bible is changed by making it known. The Bible stands on its own, as does this magnificent record revealed specifically by the Lord for our day. Please study the Book of Mormon, consider its teachings, and see if they do not square up as the words of Christ, for it was Jesus Christ who revealed it all to those equally chosen people on the western hemisphere... |
| QUESTION from:Dayn Warren, Other Religion, Age 18-24, wrote on 9/30/2000: | |
| I have spent a lot of time with a very close mormon friend of mine and have enjoyed hearing about what Mormon's believe. It has come across in our conversation's that they don't believe that Jesus was and is God saying he is merely the son of God. I recently came across an interesting passage that seems to discuss the topic and I would love to hear what you think about it and where the Mormon church stands on the doctrine of the divinity of Jesus. The passage is found in John 5:16-18. The context is that of Jesus healing on the Sabbath followed by what he says in verse 17 and the result of his words in verse 18. Jesus says that God is his Father. The response of the Jews is to want to kill Jesus for his claim at divinity. It seems very clear that in the Jewish culture that to call yourself the son of so-and-so then you were equating yourself with him. It seems that Jesus is claiming that he is equal to Yahweh and the Jews considered this blasphemy. It seems to me from the response of the Jews that Jesus was actually claiming to be God. What do you think and what is the position of the church on the issue? Any information that you can provide on the divinity of Jesus would be very helpful in my search for the truth. Thank you! | |
Jesus is Divine! Merely the Son
of God? Ponder on the meaning of
that statement. Merely the Son of
God. Are God's children inferior
to Him? I think of my own children
and how they are as much or more
than I am. All of God's children
have the potential to be like Him,
including you and I, and that is
the beauty of the Plan of
Salvation. It is His work and His
glory to bring to pass the
immortality and eternal life of
man. (see Moses 1:39)There is no reason that Jesus can not be both the Son of God, and God. He is a member of the Godhead, He is God, but he _does_ have a Father. There are three in the Godhead. D&C 130: 22 The Father has a body of flesh and bones as tangible as man's; the Son also; but the Holy Ghost has not a body of flesh and bones, but is a personage of Spirit. Were it not so, the Holy Ghost could not dwell in us. The Book of Mormon prophets teach of the divinity of Jesus Christ. Abinadi was one of the great ones, and he taught this:
Mosiah 15:1 AND now Abinadi said
unto them: I would that ye should
understand that God himself shall
come down among the children of
men, and shall redeem his people.
2 And because he dwelleth in flesh
he shall be called the Son of God,
and having subjected the flesh to
the will of the Father, being the
Father and the Son-
3 The Father, because he was
conceived by the power of God; and
the Son, because of the flesh;
thus becoming the Father and Son-
4 And they are one God, yea, the
very Eternal Father of heaven and
of earth.
5 And thus the flesh becoming
subject to the Spirit, or the Son
to the Father, being one God,
suffereth temptation, and yieldeth
not to the temptation, but
suffereth himself to be mocked,
and scourged, and cast out, and
disowned by his people.
6 And after all this, after
working many mighty miracles among
the children of men, he shall be
led, yea, even as Isaiah said, as
a sheep before the shearer is
dumb, so he opened not his mouth.
7 Yea, even so he shall be led,
crucified, and slain, the flesh
becoming subject even unto death,
the will of the Son being
swallowed up in the will of the
Father.
8 And thus God breaketh the bands
of death, having gained the
victory over death; giving the Son
power to make intercession for the
children of men-
9 Having ascended into heaven,
having the bowels of mercy; being
filled with compassion towards the
children of men; standing betwixt
them and justice; having broken
the bands of death, taken upon
himself their iniquity and their
transgressions, having redeemed
them, and satisfied the demands of
justice.
Jesus commanded us to be as He is, and Father in Heaven. Why would He issue such a commandment if it were not possible? Consider His words to the Nephites: 3 Ne. 12: 48 Therefore I would that ye should be perfect even as I, or your Father who is in heaven is perfect. This commandment alludes to the truth that we CAN become like the Father and the Son. It is possible through complete obedience to His laws and ordinances, through faith, and through the Atonement of Christ...His sufferings for us. It may not happen in this mortality, but then again it may, Enoch and his whole city were translated because of their perfection in Christ. If it happens for us after the resurrection, that is fine too, as long as it does happen. I believe it will, and I glory in Christ because of what He has made possible for all of God's other children, literal children. We are descendants of God. |
| QUESTION from:Todd Plumb, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 10/1/2000: | |
| Dear Answerman, Why do so many passages in the Book of Mormon exactly follow the wording in the New Testament? It seems to me that if the Book of Mormon were written in the Americas and the New Testament in the Middle East that there would be very few coincidences in wording. For example, Alma chapter 40 seems to have many exact phrases to 1 Corinthians Chapter 15. How can this be explained except by stating that Joseph Smith wrote this chapter after reading the exact phraseology in 1 Corinthians 15? | |
You say there are some
similarities between writings of
various Book of Mormon prophets
and the Middle East prophets such
as Alma and Paul, however,
similarities exist even in the
Bible.One of the most obvious is Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Why do we have these four versions of the same events in the Bible, and why are there some differences between these accounts? It is because different prophets write what the Spirit inspires them to write, and there are many similarities between these four books, even much verbatim. Why is it when the Book of Mormon has some writings in it that are similar to those found in the Bible, that people might assume that Joseph Smith copied from the Bible? Did Matthew copy from Mark, or Luke from John? If any concern exists for the Book of Mormon writings being "copied" then there should be concern for the Bible as well. As for me, I have no concerns because it is obvious that the Lord repeats Himself to the various prophets. He is the same yesterday, today, and forever, and should be repeating Himself. Alma chapter 40 is very different however, in what seems like 99% of the content and language when compared to 1 Corinthians 15, and there are many doctrines of the resurrection that are touched upon by Alma that are not necessarily covered in 1 Corinthians 15 by Paul. For example, we learn of what happens after death and before the resurrection:
Alma 40:11 Now, concerning the
state of the soul between death
and the resurrection-Behold, it
has been made known unto me by an
angel, that the spirits of all
men, as soon as they are departed
from this mortal body, yea, the
spirits of all men, whether they
be good or evil, are taken home to
that God who gave them life.
12 And then shall it come to pass,
that the spirits of those who are
righteous are received into a
state of happiness, which is
called paradise, a state of rest,
a state of peace, where they shall
rest from all their troubles and
from all care, and sorrow.
13 And then shall it come to pass,
that the spirits of the wicked,
yea, who are evil-for behold, they
have no part nor portion of the
Spirit of the Lord; for behold,
they chose evil works rather than
good; therefore the spirit of the
devil did enter into them, and
take possession of their house-and
these shall be cast out into outer
darkness; there shall be weeping,
and wailing, and gnashing of
teeth, and this because of their
own iniquity, being led captive by
the will of the devil.
14 Now this is the state of the
souls of the wicked, yea, in
darkness, and a state of awful,
fearful looking for the fiery
indignation of the wrath of God
upon them; thus they remain in
this state, as well as the
righteous in paradise, until the
time of their resurrection.
23 The soul shall be restored to
the body, and the body to the
soul; yea, and every limb and
joint shall be restored to its
body; yea, even a hair of the head
shall not be lost; but all things
shall be restored to their proper
and perfect frame.
|
| QUESTION from:alfredo cantu, Other Religion, Age 25-34, wrote on 10/6/2000: | |
| Jesus stated that the two most important commandments in Matthew 24:37- 40 "Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets." Then why do LDS pratice in war for the government. Jesus also stated in John 18: 36 "Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence." | |
Some wars are justified. The Book
of Mormon teaches that. But there
are conditions as well. It is not
necesssarily a good thing to fight
in just any war. I would encourage
anyone to carefully consider any
war that they get involved in. It
is not sufficient to say that "my
government wants me to fight," and
then go without conscience.
Remember Hitler's people. One must
answer also to God. I am appalled
at most of the wars taking place
today. Nearly all unjustified, and
wicked, it seems. But there are
times for justified war, and when
it is sorely needed.How can one love one's wife and children, and not defend them from an enemy? Self defense is honorable. The Lord revealed to the Nephite prophets that is was so: Alma 43: 47 And again, the Lord has said that: Ye shall defend your families even unto bloodshed. Therefore for this cause were the Nephites contending with the Lamanites, to defend themselves, and their families, and their lands, their country, and their rights, and their religion. It is a commandment to defend our families. The little ones, and our wives, should not be left to the mercy of an enemy. It is for these reasons that we fight. It is noble and honorable, even though it is sad for the enemy. The nephites felt this way about it:
Alma 48: 23 Now, they were sorry
to take up arms against the
Lamanites, because they did not
delight in the shedding of blood;
yea, and this was not all-they
were sorry to be the means of
sending so many of their brethren
out of this world into an eternal
world, unprepared to meet their
God.
24 Nevertheless, they could not
suffer to lay down their lives,
that their wives and their
children should be massacred by
the barbarous cruelty of those who
were once their brethren, yea, and
had dissented from their church,
and had left them and had gone to
destroy them by joining the
Lamanites.
25 Yea, they could not bear that
their brethren should rejoice over
the blood of the Nephites, so long
as there were any who should keep
the commandments of God, for the
promise of the Lord was, if they
should keep his commandments they
should prosper in the land.
The responsibility for decision on whether to be involved in a war rests upon individuals on both sides. For example, I have heard that in WW II some of the Germans fighting for Hitler were Christians. But it would be better to die or be imprisoned than to fight a murderous war for a murderous dictator. People must take responsibility for answering to God as well. The Nephites were told by their prophet that they are only justified in defending their own lands, and not to take an offense.
3 Ne. 3: 20 Now the people said
unto Gidgiddoni: Pray unto the
Lord, and let us go up upon the
mountains and into the wilderness,
that we may fall upon the robbers
and destroy them in their own
lands.
21 But Gidgiddoni saith unto
them: The Lord forbid; for if we
should go up against them the Lord
would deliver us into their hands;
therefore we will prepare
ourselves in the center of our
lands, and we will gather all our
armies together, and we will not
go against them, but we will wait
till they shall come against us;
therefore as the Lord liveth, if
we do this he will deliver them
into our hands.
This is a case against so called "Pre-Emptive Strikes" which basically is a "get them before they get us" strategy. It is wrong. |
| QUESTION from:Shannon, Non-Denominational Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 10/6/2000: | |
| I am thinking about returning to the Church and I was wondering would I have to be baptized again ? And what would I have to do ? Thank you | |
Shannon:Whether you need to be baptized again depends only on whether you had your name removed from the records of the Church. Most likely, you need only start attending again, but ask your Bishop. Look up his phone number in the white pages under Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Meet with him, and he can help you understand what steps you may need to take before you begin partaking the Sacrament again, if any, and then you can begin again renewing your covenants you originally made with Jesus Christ at your Baptism. Some of the Book of Mormon prophets have spoken about Baptism, and what we must do when we are baptized:
Moro. 8: 25 And the first fruits
of repentance is baptism; and
baptism cometh by faith unto the
fulfilling the commandments; and
the fulfilling the commandments
bringeth remission of sins;
26 And the remission of sins
bringeth meekness, and lowliness
of heart; and because of meekness
and lowliness of heart cometh the
visitation of the Holy Ghost,
which Comforter filleth with hope
and perfect love, which love
endureth by diligence unto prayer,
until the end shall come, when all
the saints shall dwell with God.
2 Ne. 31: 13
13 Wherefore, my beloved brethren,
I know that if ye shall follow the
Son, with full purpose of heart,
acting no hypocrisy and no
deception before God, but with
real intent, repenting of your
sins, witnessing unto the Father
that ye are willing to take upon
you the name of Christ, by baptism-
yea, by following your Lord and
your Savior down into the water,
according to his word, behold,
then shall ye receive the Holy
Ghost; yea, then cometh the
baptism of fire and of the Holy
Ghost; and then can ye speak with
the tongue of angels, and shout
praises unto the Holy One of
Israel.
14 But, behold, my beloved
brethren, thus came the voice of
the Son unto me, saying: After ye
have repented of your sins, and
witnessed unto the Father that ye
are willing to keep my
commandments, by the baptism of
water, and have received the
baptism of fire and of the Holy
Ghost, and can speak with a new
tongue, yea, even with the tongue
of angels, and after this should
deny me, it would have been better
for you that ye had not known me.
15 And I heard a voice from the
Father, saying: Yea, the words of
my Beloved are true and faithful.
He that endureth to the end, the
same shall be saved.
16 And now, my beloved brethren, I
know by this that unless a man
shall endure to the end, in
following the example of the Son
of the living God, he cannot be
saved.
17 Wherefore, do the things which
I have told you I have seen that
your Lord and your Redeemer should
do; for, for this cause have they
been shown unto me, that ye might
know the gate by which ye should
enter. For the gate by which ye
should enter is repentance and
baptism by water; and then cometh
a remission of your sins by fire
and by the Holy Ghost.
18 And then are ye in this strait
and narrow path which leads to
eternal life; yea, ye have entered
in by the gate; ye have done
according to the commandments of
the Father and the Son; and ye
have received the Holy Ghost,
which witnesses of the Father and
the Son, unto the fulfilling of
the promise which he hath made,
that if ye entered in by the way
ye should receive.
19 And now, my beloved brethren,
after ye have gotten into this
strait and narrow path, I would
ask if all is done? Behold, I say
unto you, Nay; for ye have not
come thus far save it were by the
word of Christ with unshaken faith
in him, relying wholly upon the
merits of him who is mighty to
save.
20 Wherefore, ye must press
forward with a steadfastness in
Christ, having a perfect
brightness of hope, and a love of
God and of all men. Wherefore, if
ye shall press forward, feasting
upon the word of Christ, and
endure to the end, behold, thus
saith the Father: Ye shall have
eternal life.
These are true words of prophets of Christ from ages past. |
| QUESTION from:Amanda Linn Matts, Protestant Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 10/12/2000: | |
| It's my understanding that when someone is excommunicated for the church, and then come back, they are baptized again. The bible says there is only ONE baptism. Doesn't this contradict? Also, I am a woman and truely beleive with all my heart that I have been called to be a minister in church. However, in the mormon church only men can hold the preisthood. First of all doesn't Romans list women apostles? Second, Paul also said that women prophesied in the church. Otherwise he wouldn't have had any reason to tell them to cover their heads when they do so. Third, don't the LDS beleive in modern day prophets and revelations from God? SO why is my calling not true according to LDS belief? I'm not some feminist or anything.....but I have a very hard time beleiving in something that contradicts what God had called me to do. And I'm not in the habit of telling Him no. Can you help me understand this? | |
Eph. 4: 5 One Lord, one faith, one
baptism,
I suppose that the scripture could
be interpreted in such a way, but
even so, I believe the meaning of
the word ONE in the scripture
means one correct way, not one
time. The scripture also states
One Church, yet we know that there
are many churches of the Lord
throughout the ages, so we have an
obvious definition there. About your being a woman and being called of the Lord's Spirit, I have no doubt. Serve people in whatever capacity you feel inspired. You state correct that only men can hold the priesthood of God, for that was ordained before the foundations of the world, just as it was ordained that only women could bear children. The unique roles of man and woman in this life were set up by the Lord (see Proclamation on the Family). However, just because you can not hold the priesthood by name, if you marry in the Church you could hug your husband, and that would be holding the priesthood :-) Seriously, you can be a minister for the Lord at any time. It's missionary work! You can teach, preach, and guide the children of Heavenly Father as much as you desire. The Book of Mormon has an account of a Lamanite woman named Abish, who was converted to the Lord among the faithless Lamanites. She recognized a missionary opportunity, and was extremely instrumental in getting the masses out to see the conversion of their King, Lamoni. Alma 19: 16 16 And it came to pass that they did call on the name of the Lord, in their might, even until they had all fallen to the earth, save it were one of the Lamanitish women, whose name was Abish, she having been converted unto the Lord for many years, on account of a remarkable vision of her father- We can do much good in the world. What if a man was unsatisfied with the Priesthood and wanted to be a mother and bear children? Is that a correct desire if the Lord didn't design it that way? You have desires to serve the Lord, to teach and minister to others, and that is a great desire. He allows it. Don't let the fact that the Priesthood responsibilities lay at the feet of men get you down. You have enough responsibilities as a woman, potentially a mother, even more, already!
Also, I am not sure what Bible
version you are reading, but in
the King James version Paul
actually says women should be
silent in the Church (I'm not sure
what he meant...):
1 Cor. 14:34 Let your women keep
silence in the churches: for it is
not permitted unto them to speak;
but they are commanded to be under
obedience, as also saith the law.
And there were no female apostles that I could find... That doesn't mean that there were no female missionaries, it just indicates that these things are largely a priesthood responsibility, as President Gordon B. Hinkley has recently taught in General Conference. |
| QUESTION from:Michael Trammell, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 10/13/2000: | |
| Does it actually say in the Bible that Jesus gave his Apostles the Priesthood? Does it ever explain what the Priesthood actually is? I know that Christ layed his hands on his Apostles head but how could one convince another that it was when Christ gave them the Priesthood. | |
The answers come from modern day
revelation, for we have prophets
today who have received
understanding from Jesus Christ
pertaining to points of doctrine.
Joseph Smith, the first prophet of
this last dispensation has
received instructions pertaining
to authority and how Priesthood is
bestowed, by the laying on of
hands, by those are are in
authority to preach the gospel and
administer in the ordinances
thereof (Articles of Faith).Joseph Smith brought forth the Book of Mormon by the gift and power of God. It teaches of how Christ gave his authority to the Nephites:
3 Nephi 11:15 And it came to pass
that the multitude went forth, and
thrust their hands into his side,
and did feel the prints of the
nails in his hands and in his
feet; and this they did do, going
forth one by one until they had
all gone forth, and did see with
their eyes and did feel with their
hands, and did know of a surety
and did bear record, that it was
he, of whom it was written by the
prophets, that should come.
16 And when they had all gone
forth and had witnessed for
themselves, they did cry out with
one accord, saying:
17 Hosanna! Blessed be the name of
the Most High God! And they did
fall down at the feet of Jesus,
and did worship him.
18 And it came to pass that he
spake unto Nephi (for Nephi was
among the multitude) and he
commanded him that he should come
forth.
19 And Nephi arose and went forth,
and bowed himself before the Lord
and did kiss his feet.
20 And the Lord commanded him that
he should arise. And he arose and
stood before him.
21 And the Lord said unto him: I
give unto you power that ye shall
baptize this people when I am
again ascended into heaven.
22 And again the Lord called
others, and said unto them
likewise; and he gave unto them
power to baptize. And he said unto
them: On this wise shall ye
baptize; and there shall be no
disputations among you.
23 Verily I say unto you, that
whoso repenteth of his sins
through your words, and desireth
to be baptized in my name, on this
wise shall ye baptize them-Behold,
ye shall go down and stand in the
water, and in my name shall ye
baptize them.
24 And now behold, these are the
words which ye shall say, calling
them by name, saying:
25 Having authority given me of
Jesus Christ, I baptize you in the
name of the Father, and of the
Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.
26 And then shall ye immerse them
in the water, and come forth again
out of the water.
We can see that unless the Apostles got the authority from Jesus Christ directly, they had no power to administer in the ordinances of Jesus Christ. Joseph Smith, the first Apostle of these last days, received his Priesthood authority directly from Jesus Christ through the ministration of his angels, even John the Baptist, and Peter, James, and John. Resurrected beings, who bestowed the Priesthood by the laying on of hands, and then commanding Joseph to do the same.
JOSEPH SMITH-HISTORY 68 We still
continued the work of translation,
when, in the ensuing month (May,
1829), we on a certain day went
into the woods to pray and inquire
of the Lord respecting baptism for
the remission of sins, that we
found mentioned in the translation
of the plates. While we were thus
employed, praying and calling upon
the Lord, a messenger from heaven
descended in a cloud of light, and
having laid his hands upon us, he
ordained us, saying:
69 Upon you my fellow servants, in
the name of Messiah, I confer the
Priesthood of Aaron, which holds
the keys of the ministering of
angels, and of the gospel of
repentance, and of baptism by
immersion for the remission of
sins; and this shall never be
taken again from the earth until
the sons of Levi do offer again an
offering unto the Lord in
righteousness.
70 He said this Aaronic Priesthood
had not the power of laying on
hands for the gift of the Holy
Ghost, but that this should be
conferred on us hereafter; and he
commanded us to go and be
baptized, and gave us directions
that I should baptize Oliver
Cowdery, and that afterwards he
should baptize me.
71 Accordingly we went and were
baptized. I baptized him first,
and afterwards he baptized me-
after which I laid my hands upon
his head and ordained him to the
Aaronic Priesthood, and afterwards
he laid his hands on me and
ordained me to the same Priesthood-
for so we were commanded.*
72 The messenger who visited us on
this occasion and conferred this
Priesthood upon us, said that his
name was John, the same that is
called John the Baptist in the New
Testament, and that he acted under
the direction of Peter, James and
John, who held the keys of the
Priesthood of Melchizedek, which
Priesthood, he said, would in due
time be conferred on us, and that
I should be called the first Elder
of the Church, and he (Oliver
Cowdery) the second. It was on the
fifteenth day of May, 1829, that
we were ordained under the hand of
this messenger, and baptized.
73 Immediately on our coming up
out of the water after we had been
baptized, we experienced great and
glorious blessings from our
Heavenly Father. No sooner had I
baptized Oliver Cowdery, than the
Holy Ghost fell upon him, and he
stood up and prophesied many
things which should shortly come
to pass. And again, so soon as I
had been baptized by him, I also
had the spirit of prophecy, when,
standing up, I prophesied
concerning the rise of this
Church, and many other things
connected with the Church, and
this generation of the children of
men. We were filled with the Holy
Ghost, and rejoiced in the God of
our salvation.
We learn from the modern records and revelations pertaining to the details that are not to be found specifically in the biblical record. That's OK. The Lord works through modern prophets. He has always worked through prophets. He has said: Amos 3: 7 Surely the Lord GOD will do nothing, but he revealeth his secret unto his servants the prophets. |
| QUESTION from:Sandra Valdez, Protestant Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 10/16/2000: | |
| What happens to us after we die here on Earth? What are the different possibilities? | |
The Book of Mormon prophet Alma
received a revelation from the
Lord on this very matter, and
recorded it as follows:
Alma 40:9 Therefore, there is a
time appointed unto men that they
shall rise from the dead; and
there is a space between the time
of death and the resurrection. And
now, concerning this space of
time, what becometh of the souls
of men is the thing which I have
inquired diligently of the Lord to
know; and this is the thing of
which I do know.
10 And when the time cometh when
all shall rise, then shall they
know that God knoweth all the
times which are appointed unto man.
11 Now, concerning the state of
the soul between death and the
resurrection-Behold, it has been
made known unto me by an angel,
that the spirits of all men, as
soon as they are departed from
this mortal body, yea, the spirits
of all men, whether they be good
or evil, are taken home to that
God who gave them life.
12 And then shall it come to pass,
that the spirits of those who are
righteous are received into a
state of happiness, which is
called paradise, a state of rest,
a state of peace, where they shall
rest from all their troubles and
from all care, and sorrow.
13 And then shall it come to pass,
that the spirits of the wicked,
yea, who are evil-for behold, they
have no part nor portion of the
Spirit of the Lord; for behold,
they chose evil works rather than
good; therefore the spirit of the
devil did enter into them, and
take possession of their house-and
these shall be cast out into outer
darkness; there shall be weeping,
and wailing, and gnashing of
teeth, and this because of their
own iniquity, being led captive by
the will of the devil.
14 Now this is the state of the
souls of the wicked, yea, in
darkness, and a state of awful,
fearful looking for the fiery
indignation of the wrath of God
upon them; thus they remain in
this state, as well as the
righteous in paradise, until the
time of their resurrection.
You can read the entire account of this revelation at the LDS.ORG web site by clicking here. That's what happens immediately after we die. We go to the Spirit World and await resurrection. This is not the final judgement. The final judgement described in the Book of Revelation (New Testament) happens after our resurrection when we are brought before God to be judged of all our works, whether they be good or evil. For a scripture description of what happens after the judgement, this can be found in the revelation on the Three Kingdoms of Glory, found in D&C 76. |
| QUESTION from:Chris Brannen, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 10/18/2000: | |
| Hello just wanted to say I enjoy your sight very much, but I do have a question you can help me with,I'am a recent convert to the church now close to 2 years and I hold both Priesthoods.I serve 2 callings as well,my question is in a respose to a question, Record:4591 pertaining to marriage? I'am married have 3 children, my wife is not a member and at the present time refuses to be! so my question is if we are never sealed in the TEMPLE for time and eternity as stated in the Doctrine & covanents, than I shall have no Increase? is that correct? and if so what of the missionarys who never marry? Thanks Chris. | |
My faith in Christ whispers to me
that He is just and fair, and all
faithful people will have all of
the blessings that they deserve.
You keep "working" on your wife,
and pray hard, and she will come
around. It will largely depend on
your faith. Prayers for and in
behalf of the unfaithful do get
answered. Remember Alma the
Younger:Mosiah 27: 14 And again, the angel said: Behold, the Lord hath heard the prayers of his people, and also the prayers of his servant, Alma, who is thy father; for he has prayed with much faith concerning thee that thou mightest be brought to the knowledge of the truth; therefore, for this purpose have I come to convince thee of the power and authority of God, that the prayers of his servants might be answered according to their faith. In my personal case, the Lord did not send an angel to one of my unbelieving daughters, but faithful young men who went on missions, and through association introduced my daughter to the testimony that was waiting to be born. She has been born again, and we did pray very much concerning her. It took years. If it takes decades, we still need to hang in there and endure to the end. |
| QUESTION from:Pete Moss, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 10/20/2000: | |
| How can the garden of eden be located in Jackson County Missouri, as Joseph Smith said. When the Bible says 4 rivers flowed out of eden. One being the Euphrates and another flowed into ethiopia. Those facts make it seem that he was a ocean and a continent away. How can one have any faith in a man so confused? | |
Joseph was not confused, but has
revealed a marvelous and wonderful
thing. That the earth was once one
land mass, and one continent. Many
people do not realize this. If you
carefully examine the shape of
Africa's west coast, you will see
that it matches the American
continents east coast. Like a
puzzle they fit together. During
the times of the flood of Noah's
era, the earth was divided in the
days of Peleg (see Gen. 10:25).
It will yet be one land mass again
in the future, before Christ
reigns personally upon the earth!
The Book of Mormon prophet Ether spoke of what the American Continent became after the waters of the flood receded off of the face of it: A Choice Land! A separate land! ...with conditions placed upon it relating to faith and service in Christ.
Ether 13:2 For behold, [the
Jaredites] rejected all the words
of Ether; for he truly told them
of all things, from the beginning
of man; and that after the waters
had receded from off the face of
this land it became a choice land
above all other lands, a chosen
land of the Lord; wherefore the
Lord would have that all men
should serve him who dwell upon
the face thereof;
3 And that it was the place of the
New Jerusalem, which should come
down out of heaven, and the holy
sanctuary of the Lord.
4 Behold, Ether saw the days of
Christ, and he spake concerning a
New Jerusalem upon this
land. So if the land of America and Africa were originally one land mass, then it can be understood that those rivers were accessible to Adam and Eve, and their posterity. The Lord will join them together again as revealed in the following revelation:
D&C 133:17 For behold, the Lord
God hath sent forth the angel
crying through the midst of
heaven, saying: Prepare ye the way
of the Lord, and make his paths
straight, for the hour of his
coming is nigh-
18 When the Lamb shall stand upon
Mount Zion, and with him a hundred
and forty-four thousand, having
his Father's name written on their
foreheads.
19 Wherefore, prepare ye for the
coming of the Bridegroom; go ye,
go ye out to meet him.
20 For behold, he shall stand upon
the mount of Olivet, and upon the
mighty ocean, even the great deep,
and upon the islands of the sea,
and upon the land of Zion.
21 And he shall utter his voice
out of Zion, and he shall speak
from Jerusalem, and his voice
shall be heard among all people;
22 And it shall be a voice as the
voice of many waters, and as the
voice of a great thunder, which
shall break down the mountains,
and the valleys shall not be found.
23 He shall command the great
deep, and it shall be driven back
into the north countries, and the
islands shall become one land;
24 And the land of Jerusalem and
the land of Zion shall be turned
back into their own place, and the
earth shall be like as it was in
the days before it was divided.
25 And the Lord, even the Savior,
shall stand in the midst of his
people, and shall reign over all
flesh.
Some scientists see the rate of the so- called "Continental Drift" as 1 cm to 10 cm per year, or less than four inches! ...and so this "drift" has been taking place according to them for 600 million years. The Lord has done and will do, however, a major acceleration of this "drift" when he melts the earth with a fervent heat before He reigns personally upon the earth. What suposedly takes millions of years can be accomplished in a "day" with the Lord.
2 Pet. 3: 12 Looking for and
hasting unto the coming of the day
of God, wherein the heavens being
on fire shall be dissolved, and
the elements shall melt with
fervent heat?
3 Ne. 26: 3 And [Jesus] did
expound all things (to the
multitude of Nephites), even from
the beginning until the time that
he should come in his glory-yea,
even all things which should come
upon the face of the earth, even
until the elements should melt
with fervent heat, and the earth
should be wrapt together as a
scroll, and the heavens and the
earth should pass away;
Morm. 9: 2 Behold, will ye believe
in the day of your visitation-
behold, when the Lord shall come,
yea, even that great day when the
earth shall be rolled together as
a scroll, and the elements shall
melt with fervent heat, yea, in
that great day when ye shall be
brought to stand before the Lamb
of God-then will ye say that there
is no God?
|
| QUESTION from:Gordon Comfort, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 10/21/2000: | |
| I actually have two questions. 1) How did the Lehi and Co. build a temple like Soloman with little resources? 2) How did a whole nation come from Lehi and Co. in such a short period of time? I have been struggling with these two for a while. Thank you. Keep up the good work. | |
Most everyone struggles with this
one, until they do the math.Lehi and Sariah had four sons, and possibly four or more daughters. They had two more sons in the wilderness before they passed on after arriving in the Promised land. They may have had more daughters in the wilderness too. Easily, they had 10 or more kids before getting on the boat. They brought along Ishmael and his family, and possibly this family had enough children to match and provide wives and husbands for the children of Lehi and Sariah. Possibly they had more kids in the wilderness too. If the Lord planned it, it was so. It would not be unreasonable to think that there was a potential of 20 children to start. These potential 20 had children in the wilderness for 10 years before they ever built the boat, and before they arrived in the Promised land. Lets say that there were 10 families (the children of Lehi and Ishmael) having children by the time they arrived in the promised land. Some obviously had children in the wilderness as well. But let's start small with 10 families. If these families each had 10 kids, and after 15 years their firstborns began to be married, then in another 15 years, the children would all be married and having their own children. So, after only 30 years we have 100 families having each 10 kids. After another 30 years, these 100 families having 10 kids each have grown to 1000 families having 10 kids each, or a population of 10,000. Some will have died already, but not too many. 60 years, a population of 10,000. As the 1000 families have 10 kids each, then after 30 more years there could be 10,000 families having children at these old fashioned high population rates. Some great grandparents will be dieing, but they are still few. In 30 more years we have 100,000 families, having kids, and after 30 more years we have 1,000,000 families having kids, and so on, this number of families grows by 10 times every 30 years. The population does not grow by the same rate, because of the passing away of generations past. However, the current generation exceeds the population of the dieing generation by 100 times. So a 1% reduction factor needs to be applied to any growth. This is practically negligible. After only 150 years, the population could have grown to over 1,000,000 families. After 180 years, it could have grown to 10,000,000 families. After 210 years it could have grown to 100,000,000 families, which would exceed todays US population. If we subtract for deaths the 1% factor, then that's a million people who died, but then instead of 100,000,000, we have 99,000,000 families, and that's about the same... What could it have been after 600 years? (a BIG number!) Is there any doubt a huge nation could have come from Lehi in so short a time? Not to me. The possibility is there. As for the temple, the Americas had many resources, and as I speculated above, there may have been lots of people to help Nephi build the temple. If 70% of the people fled with Nephi to get away from his murderous brothers, then Nephi would have 70% of the population. If Nephi was 25 when he got to the promised land and 10 families were having kids, including his own, then when Nephi turned 85 (60 years later) there could have been 1000 families, or 2000 adults, or 1000 men. 700 (70%) could have been with Nephi. That's a lot of labor. It may have taken decades to build the temple. It took the Latter-day Saints 40 years to build the relatively small Salt Lake temple. |
| QUESTION from:Letcher O. Simmons, Other Religion, Age 50+, wrote on 10/25/2000: | |
| If your church has the power of the priesthood, why can you not heal the sick all the time. Is the priesthood the power to act in his name. Some scriptures would be great. Thanks | |
It all depends on the will of the
Lord whether that person gets
healed or not. It also depends on
the faith of the individuals
giving the blessing as well as the
one receiving the blessing.
Jesus' Apostles could not heal a
man of having an evil spirit, and
Jesus taught them that fasting was
necessary in that case (they
needed additional spiritual
strength). See Matthew 17:19 Not all in the Church are of perfect faith, that is true, but the will of the Lord is also operative concerning these things. Sometimes the Lord constrains. A good example of this is in the Book of Mormon, where Alma and Amulek witnessed the martyrdom of faithful saints at the hands of murderous chief judges in their government. Amulek wanted to use the power of God to save the innocent women and children from the flames, but Alma was constrained of the Lord to not do that:
Alma 14:10 And when Amulek saw the
pains of the women and children
who were consuming in the fire, he
also was pained; and he said unto
Alma: How can we witness this
awful scene? Therefore let us
stretch forth our hands, and
exercise the power of God which is
in us, and save them from the
flames.
11 But Alma said unto him: The
Spirit constraineth me that I must
not stretch forth mine hand; for
behold the Lord receiveth them up
unto himself, in glory; and he
doth suffer that they may do this
thing, or that the people may do
this thing unto them, according to
the hardness of their hearts, that
the judgments which he shall
exercise upon them in his wrath
may be just; and the blood of the
innocent shall stand as a witness
against them, yea, and cry
mightily against them at the last
day.
Then the judge said: 15 Behold, ye
see that ye had not power to save
those who had been cast into the
fire; neither has God saved them
because they were of thy faith.
And the judge smote them again
upon their cheeks, and asked: What
say ye for yourselves?
Alma was obedient to the will of the Lord. That is why he was the prophet. They DID have the power to save those people, but Alma was more obeident to what the Spirit directed at that time. Later, when those Chief judges of the Land threw Alma and Amulek into prison, naked, and tortured them for many many days, the Lord delievered them in a miraculous way:
Alma 14:23 And it came to pass
after they had thus suffered for
many days, (and it was on the
twelfth day, in the tenth month,
*in the tenth year of the reign of
the judges over the people of
Nephi) that the chief judge over
the land of Ammonihah and many of
their teachers and their lawyers
went in unto the prison where Alma
and Amulek were bound with cords.
24 And the chief judge stood
before them, and smote them again,
and said unto them: If ye have the
power of God deliver yourselves
from these bands, and then we will
believe that the Lord will destroy
this people according to your
words.
25 And it came to pass that they
all went forth and smote them,
saying the same words, even until
the last; and when the last had
spoken unto them the power of God
was upon Alma and Amulek, and they
rose and stood upon their feet.
26 And Alma cried, saying: How
long shall we suffer these great
afflictions, O Lord? O Lord, give
us strength according to our faith
which is in Christ, even unto
deliverance. And they broke the
cords with which they were bound;
and when the people saw this, they
began to flee, for the fear of
destruction had come upon them.
27 And it came to pass that so
great was their fear that they
fell to the earth, and did not
obtain the outer door of the
prison; and the earth shook
mightily, and the walls of the
prison were rent in twain, so that
they fell to the earth; and the
chief judge, and the lawyers, and
priests, and teachers, who smote
upon Alma and Amulek, were slain
by the fall thereof.
28 And Alma and Amulek came forth
out of the prison, and they were
not hurt; for the Lord had granted
unto them power, according to
their faith which was in Christ.
And they straightway came forth
out of the prison; and they were
loosed from their bands; and the
prison had fallen to the earth,
and every soul within the walls
thereof, save it were Alma and
Amulek, was slain; and they
straightway came forth into the
city.
29 Now the people having heard a
great noise came running together
by multitudes to know the cause of
it; and when they saw Alma and
Amulek coming forth out of the
prison, and the walls thereof had
fallen to the earth, they were
struck with great fear, and fled
from the presence of Alma and
Amulek even as a goat fleeth with
her young from two lions; and thus
they did flee from the presence of
Alma and Amulek.
In other place and time, the Lord was merciful to the wicked rulers, and an army who had similarly cast Nephi and Lehi into prison, but they were all converted. I guess it is because the Lord knows their hearts... Read about Nephi and Lehi's miraculous escape from prison The will of the Lord is operative. Many people get sick, and it is the will of the Lord that they go through a sickness, and many even pass on. If we accept the will of the Lord by perceiving it through the Spirit of the Holy Ghost, we will see many people that do not get better, but their life and time on this earth is over. Sometimes even a blessing of "release" is given to those who are terminally ill, as directed by the Spirit, so that they may return to that God who gave them life. |
| QUESTION from:Mike, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 10/27/2000: | |
| Why is it that no tests have linked Native Americans to Jerusalem, or that area of the world? The only DNA tests done show a relation to those in Siberia, etc. They provide no evidence for Native Americans being ancestors of the Jews. Please help me understand why... | |
The inhabitants of this land,
before Columbus was led by the
Lord to discover it, were
Lamanites. 1 Nephi 13:12 And I looked and beheld a man among the Gentiles, who was separated from the seed of my brethren by the many waters; and I beheld the Spirit of God, that it came down and awrought upon the man; and he went forth upon the many waters, even unto the seed of my brethren, who were in the promised land. This man was Columbus, he was led by the Lord. It had been 2000 years since the Lamanite's fathers left Jerusalem. Their first father, Lehi, was not a Jew, but was of the House of Israel by the son Joseph, even of Manasseh. Ishmael who also went with Lehi's family into the wilderness, was of Ephraim. They lived in the Jerusalem vicinity, but they also knew Egyptian. Alma 10: 3 And Aminadi was a descendant of Nephi, who was the son of Lehi, who came out of the land of Jerusalem, who was a descendant of Manasseh, who was the son of Joseph who was sold into Egypt by the hands of his brethren. We don't have a lot of Manasseh in the Church right now. We have a lot of Ephraim. Who knows but many of the Tribe of Manasseh ended up in Siberia and neighboring countries thousands of years ago... But Lehi was not a Jew, or he was not of the Tribe of Judah. |
| QUESTION from:Steve, Born Again Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 10/27/2000: | |
| If the BOM is an exact translation from the plates, is it reasonable to believe that the people who wrote it would write in old English literary style (which did not get widespread until the days of King James)? | |
I think it is notable that Joseph
Smith was a man that the Lord
worked through, and he was not
a "channel" that the Lord used and
bypassed in the process. Prophets
speak what the Lord inspires them
and they typically use their own
language and style. We have had
15 prophets since the prophet
Joseph Smith, and they have all
had a unique style and delivery of
their particular message. Joseph Smith the prophet was able to put the Book of Mormon into the language in which he was familiar. He was familiar with and was a student of the Bible. It would seem appropriate that he would use the language of the day. I wonder what the Book of Mormon reads like in the 80+ languages that it is currently translated into. I am sure it reads similar to the vocabulary and style of the Latter- day Saint in each of those countries in which it was translated. The Nephites did not speak Old English. They spoke Hebrew and Egyptian, and wrote on their metal plates with a reformed Egyptian writing.
Mormon 9:30 Behold, I speak unto
you as though I spake from the
dead; for I know that ye shall
have my words.
31 Condemn me not because of mine
imperfection, neither my father,
because of his imperfection,
neither them who have written
before him; but rather give thanks
unto God that he hath made
manifest unto you our
imperfections, that ye may learn
to be more wise than we have been.
32 And now, behold, we have
written this record according to
our knowledge, in the characters
which are called among us the
reformed Egyptian, being handed
down and altered by us, according
to our manner of speech.
33 And if our plates had been
sufficiently large we should have
written in Hebrew; but the Hebrew
hath been altered by us also; and
if we could have written in
Hebrew, behold, ye would have had
no imperfection in our record.
34 But the Lord knoweth the things
which we have written, and also
that none other people knoweth our
language; and because that none
other people knoweth our language,
therefore he hath prepared means
for the interpretation thereof.
That means of interpretation was the Urim and Thummim, which allowed Joseph Smith to know the meaning of what was written on the plates. Although the Nephites did not speak Old English, Joseph Smith got the meaning right, and we have a treasure in this record! |
| QUESTION from:Jordan Thompson, Catholic Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 10/27/2000: | |
| I am trying very hard to understand your religion and I thank you for this web site to help. I might be moving to a morman community and frankly I am nervous because from what I understand I will not be accepted if I do not convert to Mormanism. I do not undestand because you all seem to have great values. (It is reassuring to know that when I have kids they will be brought up in a great community). As a Catholic I was taught to love and accept all regardless of who they are. Why arnt Mormans taught this as well? And if they are taught this why are us non Mormans not accepted and ignored? | |
We are taught that. We do practice
this, if we practice our religion
at all. Here is the doctrine that
teaches what we are to practice.
It is found in the writings of the
prophet Moroni, who taught of the
pure love of Christ:
Moroni 7:41 And what is it that ye
shall hope for? Behold I say unto
you that ye shall have hope
through the atonement of Christ
and the power of his resurrection,
to be raised unto life eternal,
and this because of your faith in
him according to the promise.
42 Wherefore, if a man have faith
he must needs have hope; for
without faith there cannot be any
hope.
43 And again, behold I say unto
you that he cannot have faith and
hope, save he shall be meek, and
lowly of heart.
44 If so, his faith and hope is
vain, for none is acceptable
before God, save the meek and
lowly in heart; and if a man be
meek and lowly in heart, and
confesses by the power of the Holy
Ghost that Jesus is the Christ, he
must needs have charity; for if he
have not charity he is nothing;
wherefore he must needs have
charity.
45 And charity suffereth long, and
is kind, and envieth not, and is
not puffed up, seeketh not her
own, is not easily provoked,
thinketh no evil, and rejoiceth
not in iniquity but rejoiceth in
the truth, beareth all things,
believeth all things, hopeth all
things, endureth all things.
46 Wherefore, my beloved brethren,
if ye have not charity, ye are
nothing, for charity never
faileth. Wherefore, cleave unto
charity, which is the greatest of
all, for all things must fail-
47 But charity is the pure love of
Christ, and it endureth forever;
and whoso is found possessed of it
at the last day, it shall be well
with him.
48 Wherefore, my beloved brethren,
pray unto the Father with all the
energy of heart, that ye may be
filled with this love, which he
hath bestowed upon all who are
true followers of his Son, Jesus
Christ; that ye may become the
sons of God; that when he shall
appear we shall be like him, for
we shall see him as he is; that we
may have this hope; that we may be
purified even as he is pure.
Amen. Now in all realilty, we are not a perfect people. We have weaknesses, and sometimes people fail here and there in their faith. If you will strive to be a friend to your new neighbors no matter what their religion, you will most likely get that all coming back to you. What goes around, comes around. I believe that completely. |
| QUESTION from:Mary McDonell, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 10/28/2000: | |
| The non lds have said that the quotations in the Book of Mormon from the Old Testament contain the same mistakes as the KJV version. How do I answer them? | |
It seems that the only reason one
would say this is to try and
discredit the Book of Mormon
somehow, but it is akin
to "cutting off one's nose despite
the face." It is the doctrine of
many churches that the Bible is
the "infallible word of God,"
which is flawless, final, etc.
Yet in saying that the KJV has
mistakes, this is an admission
which reveals what such a person
really knows and believes about
the Bible, that's its
infallibility depends on how well
it was translated.We believe the Bible to be the word of God as far as it is translated correctly. We also believe the Book of Mormon to be the word of God. There are no writings in the Book of Mormon which are biblical also, that are false. This is the important thing to remember, that although there may be some technical issues on a word here or there as some modern scholars may see it, the gospel message still comes through loud and clear, and people should not be straining at gnats and swallowing camels. The Bible and the Book of Mormon together are the word of God, as is. The Lord has said so. D&C 42: 12 And again, the elders, priests and teachers of this church shall teach the principles of my gospel, which are in the Bible and the Book of Mormon, in the which is the fulness of the gospel. If the Lord says that the fulness of His gospel is in these books, then there is no issue. The Book of Mormon prophets knew thousands of years ago that the Gentiles would mock at the Book of Mormon. They knew of their own weaknesses in writing, and felt that they might not be effective. They worried about it, but the Lord reassured, and it is the pattern of the Lord to work through the weak and imperfect things of the world. He always has, and it is a sign to those that believe:
Ether 12:23 And I said unto him:
Lord, the Gentiles will mock at
these things, because of our
weakness in writing; for Lord thou
hast made us mighty in word by
faith, but thou hast not made us
mighty in writing; for thou hast
made all this people that they
could speak much, because of the
Holy Ghost which thou hast given
them;
24 And thou hast made us that we
could write but little, because of
the awkwardness of our hands.
Behold, thou hast not made us
mighty in writing like unto the
brother of Jared, for thou madest
him that the things which he wrote
were mighty even as thou art, unto
the overpowering of man to read
them.
25 Thou hast also made our words
powerful and great, even that we
cannot write them; wherefore, when
we write we behold our weakness,
and stumble because of the placing
of our words; and I fear lest the
Gentiles shall mock at our words.
26 And when I had said this, the
Lord spake unto me, saying: Fools
mock, but they shall mourn; and my
grace is sufficient for the meek,
that they shall take no advantage
of your weakness;
|
| QUESTION from:Leon Eric Johnson, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 10/28/2000: | |
| I was talking to a Catholic the other day and he asked me why Jesus waited until he was thirty years old before he started his ministry, and I wasn't able to provide an answer. He said it was because you have to wait until you are 30 to preach. I know this is not true because we have missionaries at 19 years old, but why did Jesus wait until he was 30? | |
Jesus did not wait until He was 30
to preach. He was "about His
Father's business" when he was
only 12. But, He was still
subject to his parents, so He
waited and prepared according to
the customs of the day.In the Book Jesus the Christ, the Apostle James Talmage stated: ...[Jesus], not being thirty years old, could not have assumed the right or privilege of a teacher without contravening established customs. It was tradition and custom of Jerusalem and the Jewish Sanhedrin, etc. Nothing more. But it was not the Lord's timetable, because we have a record of Jesus when He was only 12 years old, being about His Father's business, and in the temple giving answers to doctors and lawyers as would a teacher. They were astonished at Him!
Luke 2:42 And when he was twelve
years old, they went up to
Jerusalem after the custom of the
feast.
43 And when they had fulfilled the
days, as they returned, the child
Jesus tarried behind in Jerusalem;
and Joseph and his mother knew not
of it.
44 But they, supposing him to have
been in the company, went a day's
journey; and they sought him among
their kinsfolk and acquaintance.
45 And when they found him not,
they turned back again to
Jerusalem, seeking him.
46 And it came to pass, that after
three days they found him in the
temple, sitting in the midst of
the doctors, both hearing them,
and asking them questions.
47 And all that heard him were
astonished at his understanding
and answers.
The Book of Mormon also teaches of how young people can go out and preach. It does not seem to matter what age. Joseph Smith was 14 years old when he began to make known his calling and vision. Mormon was only 15 when he went out among the Nephite people and preached as the prophet that he was.
Mormon 1:13 But wickedness did
prevail upon the face of the whole
land, insomuch that the Lord did
take away his beloved disciples,
and the work of miracles and of
healing did cease because of the
iniquity of the people.
14 And there were no gifts from
the Lord, and the Holy Ghost did
not come upon any, because of
their wickedness and unbelief.
15 And I, *being fifteen years of
age and being somewhat of a sober
mind, therefore I was visited of
the Lord, and tasted and knew of
the goodness of Jesus.
16 And I did endeavor to preach
unto this people, but my mouth was
shut, and I was forbidden that I
should preach unto them; for
behold they had wilfully rebelled
against their God; and the beloved
disciples were taken away out of
the land, because of their
iniquity.
17 But I did remain among them,
but I was forbidden to preach unto
them, because of the hardness of
their hearts; and because of the
hardness of their hearts the land
was cursed for their sake.
|
| QUESTION from:Fred Bacorot, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 11/5/2000: | |
| Who are the remnant in the BofM (3 nephi 21,22) and who is going to build the New Jerusalem. It seems to me that the New Jerusalem is going to be built by the Indians and we will assist them. Fred | |
Who are the remnant? They are the
Lamanites, or the remaining
descendants of Lehi and Ishmael.
There are many members of the
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-
day Saints in Central and South
America, and these are of Lamanite
descent. The American Indian are
only one small fraction of the
total people of which the Book of
Mormon speaks, and hopefully as
they are faithful enough, they
will also be included as heirs of
the Lord's blessings with the rest
of the faithful. The Lord is no respector of persons, and He does not favor the Tribe of Manasseh any more than the Tribe of Ephraim. Indeed, they are all pretty much the same: the Lord's covenant people. It should be noted that Lehi was a descendant of Manasseh, and Ishmael (father of the other family which inter-married with Lehi's family) was a descendant of Ephraim. This means that both of these tribes are accounted for completely in the Lamanite posterity. They are completely mixed. If the Lamanite is also Ephraim, what does this say about the current leadership in the Church who is also primarily Ephraim? It means they are pretty much one in the same, from the same tribe. It means that people can wear two hats. One can be a Lamanite and be of Ephraim. One can be of Ephraim and be a Gentile by geographic association. One can be a pure Gentile (no Israel genealogy) and get adopted into the House of Israel. It is the House of Israel who will build the New Jerusalem, comprised of the remnant, and many of the House of Israel who shall come, as well as the Gentiles who convert (which seems to be a small number...). These three groups are mentioned by the resurrected Jesus Christ in the Book of Mormon, 3 Nephi, 22,23 and more especially in 3 Nephi 22:23 . It seems to be a Mormon Myth that the "American Indian" will build the New Jerusalem. It has real no basis in fact in the scriptures, and seems to place current Church leadership in a kind of lame duck status. There is some talk of a Lamanite prophet who will take over, but this also is a misinterpretation of a scripture which pertains to Joseph Smith in the Book of Mormon. The myth would place most in current membership in the Lord's Kingdom in a lame duck status. It makes no gospel sense. I am a descendant of Ephraim, as is all my family. It seems most of the Church is in that category. I have a personal excitement over the prospect of participating in helping to build the New Jerusalem. I can feel that I will be a part of that, and look foward to that day. I suppose if I remain faithful, that all of the Lord's blessings would be made available to my family and I, with no disappointments. That is my faith. The New Jerusalem is going to be for all righteous people who have made and kept sacred covenants with the Lord. The City of Enoch will return and join with it when Christ comes again. |
| QUESTION from:Cindy Kencsan, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 12/1/1997: | |
| I am what I call an "active inactive" who desires to live the gospel more fully. I haven't paid my tithing for almost a year now and am not sure what to do so that I can be a full tithe payer. Do I pay my tithing on the past income in addition to my income now to be able to say I pay a full tithing? Or do I start paying it now and pay it for a full year before I can say I'm a full tithe payer? I would like to be able to return to the temple and need to know how to take care of this. Thanks!! | |
Cindy:Tithing is a law that expresses how we feel about the Lord. Jesus taught us "If ye love me, keep my commandments." (John 14:15) There is no such thing as "back- tithing" as the Lord does not feel about money as does the IRS. The Lord wants the hearts of His people. He doesn't even need your money. But he wants you to pay it. It is a commandment. Tithing is chiefly for us, for it helps us keep things spiritually in perspective: all things do come from the Lord. The Lord wants us to repent and follow Him. All you need to do is act on your spiritual feelings, repent of the past, and look to the future, which is bright. Tell your desires to your Bishop. Express your repentance. Start paying the tenth to the Lord from this day on, and that is what repentance is all about. The Spirit will witness to you and to your Bishop, when you are ready to go to the temple again. That day depends primarily on your heart. Get the Lord on your side by approaching Him in prayer on this. |
| QUESTION from:Mike Jordison, Other Religion, Age 18-24, wrote on 12/4/1997: | |
| After reading several of your responses to inquirers about Joseph Smith translating the Book of Mormon and utilizing his own thoughts, and languages of the times, etc. According to personal testimony by Joseph Smith, all he did was dictate the Book to the scribes. The Holy Ghost did the translating. Therefore how can there be ANY questions reguarding the accuracy and authority of the Holy Ghost, unless the Book was changed or is a fraud? I don't understand your (LDS) stance on this. | |
As we read the Bible, we can see
that each prophet has their own
style of language and speech, and
the translators who changed it
from Hebrew, etc. into English
have their style as well. We have
KJV and NIV, etc. each of which is
steeped in a style. It is not all
the same, as if the Holy Ghost did
the speaking personally. It does
not work that way. The Holy Ghost
inspires prophets (or us) with
what to say, but we still are
agents unto ourselves, and can
make choices as to the language,
indeed, our language is used in
the process. The Spirit conveys
the meaning of our language
spiritually. It is a perfect
system no matter what language is
used, or whether a man is weak in
speech (such as Moses).In the case of Joseph Smith translating the Book of Mormon, it was not the Holy Ghost that did the translating, but Joseph, under the power of the Spirit, and using the brilliant brain that the Lord blessed him with. |
| QUESTION from:K. Duane Erickson, BMS, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 50+, wrote on 12/5/1997: | |
| I would like to know the someone who says "It's not necessary for our salvation to know the geography of the Book of Mormon" ? If I were Mormon, I would come out of my grave with sword in hand to face the person who is saying, some of the things that has been recorded in the Book of Mormon is good and worthwhile, but some of it should not be bothered with. The real mystery is why there is a mystery to the lands of the Book of Mormon. Its all in Nephi's vision, and everything fits perfectly with the present day Land of Liberty which he saw. There is no mention of pyramids in the Book of Mormon, no ties in any way to any other country except the modern day United States. Lehi and Nephi saw the record recorded, buried, and brought forth from this land of promise, and that's not Mexico. I have spent 20 plus years most of which I tried to place it where the scholars of the church were paid big bucks to find the land. After personally going there, it didn't fit. Why the prophets either don't know (they must not know if they pay someone else to find the land) or cannot find it in the Book of Mormon, or just wont tell us, is the real mystery. I have thousands of written evidences of a rightous people who lived here in the United States prior to Columbus and its ignored by historians and the church. Why? Thank you, Duane | |
I don't believe that it is ignored
by the Church or historians. Sure
there have been "scholars" who
speculate on where things are, but
they don't know, and they are
about as accurate as the
scientists who believe in the
theory of evolution based on a few
pieces of the puzzle. They just
can't do it. Maybe the Lord
intended it that way, because He
didn't want us to lose sight of
the MESSAGE in the Book of Mormon
by getting all caught up in the
archealogy.That book has the answers to an exceedingly many modern day issues that face us today. I never cease to be amazed at how Lehi's and Nephi's and Alma's and Ammon's and Captain Moroni's and Mormon's and Helaman's and Nephi III's etc., experiences ALL have application to my own life in some way. I LOVE the book!!! Here's an exerpt from the EOM: Of the numerous proposed external Book of Mormon geographies, none has been positively and unambiguously confirmed by archaeology. More fundamentally, there is no agreement on whether such positive identification could be made or, if so, what form a "proof" would take; nor is it clear what would constitute "falsification" or "disproof" of various proposed geographies. Until these methodological issues have been resolved, all internal and external geographies-including supposed archaeological tests of them-should, at best, be considered only intelligent conjectures. |
| QUESTION from:Juanita Cuevas, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 12/6/1997: | |
| In the Spirit World there are two realms--one where the righteous abide (paradise) and one where the wicked abide (spirit prison). People who live a good life but did not have the opportunity to receive the gospel--when they die do they go to Paradise or to Spirit Prison? | |
Doctrine and Covenants 138 has the
answers to this. They go to the
"prison," but this is figurative:
they are under the bondage of
sin (as if in a prison). Christ has the key to let them out (His Atonement)The Spirit World is really all the same place, because the gospel is preached by the righteous to those who need it and are in the "spirit prison." D&C 138:30 ...from among the righteous, [Christ] organized his forces and appointed messengers...and commissioned them to...carry the light of the gospel to them that were in darkness, even to all the spirits of men; and thus was the gospel preached to the dead. D&C 138:31 And the chosen messengers went forth to declare the acceptable day of the Lord and proclaim liberty to the captives who were bound, even unto all who would repent of their sins and receive the gospel. Their "prison" is being under the bondage of sin. I find it fascinating to learn that faithful people are preaching the gospel of Jesus Christ in the Spirit World, and that repentance is possible there. If those spirits repent, they will be redeemed. D&C 138:57 I beheld that the faithful elders of this dispensation, when they depart from mortal life, continue their labors in the preaching of the gospel of repentance and redemption, through the sacrifice of the Only Begotten Son of God, among those who are in darkness and under the bondage of sin in the great world of the spirits of the dead. 58 The dead who repent will be redeemed, through obedience to the ordinances of the house of God, And so there we have it. The righteous are AMONG the wicked, and they are teaching repentance and the gospel of Christ. |
| QUESTION from:barbara, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 12/6/1997: | |
| were dinosaurs alive on earth when our earthly parents,Adam and Eve, were in the garden? I thought I read somewhere that there were no carnivores before the fall, and yet, i think sometimes it all fits, and then sometimes i am so confused. how can i explain this to my 8 yr old, and also to myself? thanks, you really do a great job sharing the gospel. | |
Scientists teach that Dinosaurs
have been dead for millions of
years. Yet the scriptures teach
that death came into the world by
reason of the fall of Adam (who
lived 6000 years ago). Adam named
all of the animals. How could he
name Dinosaurs if they were
already dead? And if they were not already dead, then how come scientists say that they died millions of years ago? Something is incompatible here. Choose which you will believe, God's word or the theories of man. The Book of Mormon prophet Lehi taught that before the fall of Adam, there was no death in the world! So if one believes in the Book of Mormon, they can not believe that Dinosaurs lived and died on this earth as it applies to our lifetime. Consider the following scripture: 2 Nephi 2:22 ..if Adam had not transgressed he would not have fallen, but he would have remained in the Garden of Eden. And ALL THINGS which were created must have remained in the SAME STATE in which they were after they were created; and they must have remained forever, and had no end. This scripture teaches the immortality of all things before the fall. Death came into the world AFTER Adam and Even partook of the fruit of the tree. That is what the scriptures teach. The Book of Mormon sets this especially clear. |
| QUESTION from:Karl Krout, Baptist Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 12/7/1997: | |
| Answerman, The LDS church often asks investigators to pray about the Book of Mormon, and that if they pray sincerely, the Holy Spirit will reveal that it is true. I have three objections/questions. 1) I have a coin and tell people if they flip it right, the coin will land on heads. If it lands on tails, they obviously flipped it wrong. Likewise, if one prays about the Book of Mormon and feels nothing, is the obvious assumption that you weren't sincere? 2) Isn't having to be sincere placing the resonsibility of salvation on us and not depending on God? 3) Isn't this asking for a sign (the burning in the bosom)? And yet the only sign we are to receive is the sign of Jonah? | |
Interesting analogy. Yet we are
not dealing with chance here, as
with the flipping of a coin. We
are dealing with testimony that
can be gained from God by reading
His word. A testimony is when God
speaks to one's soul by the Holy
Ghost and a conversion is the
process. It is not a chance
experience, or an intellectual
experience. It is a miracle.
There is no chance in it.
Is it a chance that someone is healthy because they exercise and eat right? Is it a chance that someone learns math by studying math? Or when we jump off a building, is it a chance that we might die? In some arguments, the factor of chance is almost non-existent, let alone 50/50 like the case with the coin. The experiment has been spelled out specifically. Read the Book of Mormon, sincerely ponder, pray, and ask the Lord if it is true. The reason that this can not be compared to flipping a coin, is that the odds are so much more than 50/50! How many people have read the Book of Mormon sincerely, fasted and prayed about it to know if it were true, asked God, and received nothing? I testify that nobody has been able to do this. That is the beauty of this! |
| QUESTION from:Shane A. Green, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 12/8/1997: | |
| In Alma 40:12-13 Alma tells of paradise and Outer Darkness. These are portrayed as the two places spirits go immediately following death. This is different than what I was always taught in Sunday school about the plan of salvation, you know, the lesson with the preexistence, earth life, paradise and spirit prison, the three degrees of glory, and outer darkness. Alma does not mention a spirit prison, only a paradise. I was taught that outer darkness is where the third that followed Satan went. Alma says we can only go to paradise or outer darkness following earth life. Was I taught wrong in Sunday school? | |
The teachings of Alma coupled with
the teachings and revelation of
Joseph F. Smith found in D&C 138,
and Joseph Smith in D&C 76 give
the complete picture. All are
compatible and very interesting
when they are used together, which
they should be. Read D&C 138 and
76 carefully, and pieces of the
puzzle come together.D&C 138 teaches that the gospel of repentance is preached in the Spirit World by the faithful ELders of Israel to those who are in darkness, and are under the bondage of sin. In order for their to be an opposition in all things, Lucifer would also have to be there with his people, and they are. The Spirit World is indeed here as Brigham Young taught. And so the Spirit World is a place where there is darkness and light. Good and evil. Faith and choice. A gospel of repentance and faith in Christ is taught. Christ went only to the faithful there after His death, and organized His missionary forces among them, and then left for His resurrection. To the wicked He did not go. (See D&C 138). If Lucifer and his angels are there in opposition to that which is good, then most certainly there is punishment for the wicked immediately after death as Alma teaches. They are captive to the devil. They have to deal with his forces and power there. An awful punishment when one considers that they came from a glorious Pre- Existence before birth. They must be set free from that awful monster, if it were at all possible, and so the key is repentance and coming out of it. But it is probably not easy, as Alma teaches that the same spirit which doth possess you at the time of your death has the power to possess you in the next world, even the Spirit World. Would it not be punishment and a terrible experience to have to be in the presence of the dark forces of the evil world, even Lucifer and his people in their outer darkness? Scary indeed, and yet justice for a wicked person who rejected God...even so, God is merciful and offers them all a chance to yet repent and at least gain the Terrestial Kingdom if they accept Christ in the Spirit World, but rejected him in the flesh (See D&C 76). At the same time, those who did not reject Christ in the flesh may have opportunity for the Celestial Kingdom! And so we have temples for those ordinances. These books are fascinating! Read the three together: Alma, D&C 138, and D&C 76 for the complete picture. Alone we only get a part. |
| QUESTION from:deatra nicholson, Catholic Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 12/10/1997: | |
| Dear answerman, what is your stand on a non practicing divorced mormon marrying a catholic. They will be married by a mormon minister. Does the Catholic have to turn mormon? What about children they might have? Please let me know where your church stands on this. Thank you very much. | |
Temple marriage is the ideal,
because there is the greatest
"chance" for success in a
marriage. A common faith is a
common extremely strong bond
between husband and wife. But all
other marriages are allowed, no
conversion is required, as
everyone has free agency to make
their choices in this life. But
there is prophetic counsel that
can help us make great choices.
Consider the following:Latter-day Saints married in a temple ceremony are considerably less likely to divorce than those married outside the temple (Thomas, 1983). Among men and women who were married in the temple, 6 percent of the men and 7 percent of the women have been divorced, while among men and women not married in the temple the figures were 28 percent and 33 percent, respectively (Heaton, The Religion and Family Connection, 1988). The late prophet Spencer W. Kimball had some counsel concerning marriage choices. He said: Marriage statistics and our general experience convince us that marriage is not easy. It is difficult when all factors are favorable. The divorces increase constantly, even where the spouses have the same general background of race, religion, finances, education, and otherwise. (58-08) |
| QUESTION from:Nicole Christiansen, Other Religion, Age 18-24, wrote on 12/12/1997: | |
| Why is the temple wedding ceremony so private. If I were considering converting to Mormonism and wanted to know what my marraige ceremony would be like, would any one tell me? How does one prepare for such a secret ceremony? Is the temple wedding based on anything scriptural? | |
Nicole:
It is not as if we can not say
anything about it. It is sacred,
so we do not reveal to the world
the sacred ordinance. But let me
just briefly describe what happens
in general.The bride and groom come into a fairly small "sealing" room, a beautiful room, and family and friends are already in there when they come in. They kneel on each side of an alter, facing each other, join hands, and the "Sealer" (a wonderful wise man who holds the Priesthood sealing power) begins some words of counsel. Then he says the words of the ordinance, and then it is done! It is wonderously simple, yet the Spirit of the Holy Ghost present is powerful. Then traditionally, the couple may exchange rings after this is over, but it is not a part of the temple ceremony. If you would like a bible scripture that applies to the sealing power, consider that Christ gave this power to Peter: Matthew 16:19 And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven. |
| QUESTION from:Derek Keith Kelly, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 12/13/1997: | |
| Does everyone have a "mission" in life that they will be spared for until they complete it? Can people die because they became victim to chance inherent to mortality, or does everyone have a "time to go"? Can some people have a mission, die in an accident or to violence, and not be allowed to complete their mission (God finding another way)? I think of Abinadi and I think of a friend across the street who died in a car accident. | |
There are works and missions to
fulfill in the World of Spirits
after we die. This life includes
our time in the Spirit World,
before our eventual resurrection
and judgement. Consider the
following scripture:D&C 138:57 I beheld that the faithful elders of this dispensation, when they depart from mortal life, continue their labors in the preaching of the gospel of repentance and redemption, through the sacrifice of the Only Begotten Son of God, among those who are in darkness and under the bondage of sin in the great world of the spirits of the dead. 58 The dead who repent will be redeemed, through obedience to the ordinances of the house of God, 59 And after they have paid the penalty of their transgressions, and are washed clean, shall receive a reward according to their works, for they are heirs of salvation. (emphasis mine) As to everyone having a mission and an appointed time to die, well, yes. Unless we think that some people have no purpose in life. We all do! Our mission in life may be as simple as obeying the commandments of Christ, and staying on the straight and narrow path. Yet it may include much more as well. The Lord will let us know what our mission is, by the power of His Spirit. |
| QUESTION from:VERN, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 12/16/1997: | |
| Next Month I will be leaving to go on my mission. My question is; I look at other missionaries that are about to go, and it seems like they know so much more about the gospel than me. I was born into the Church, I graduated from seminary, yet I feel like I know less. DO YOU THINK THIS WILL AFFECT MY MISSION EXPERIENCE? | |
Vern:
Knowledge of the gospel is good
and you should strive to get more,
but the Lord has _always_ worked
through the weak things of the
world, for they are more humble
people.If you are humble and stay spiritually clean, and are valiant in the testimony of Jesus Christ, then you will be blessed to have the Holy Ghost work through you, and then you will be doing God's work. Contrast the well-studied young man who has the scriptures memorized, but thinks too highly of his abilities. He relies less on the Holy Ghost and so he is less effective. What I am saying, my brother, is that YOU QUALIFY! You have already expressed your humility on the matter, now just make sure that you keep the Spirit and have confidence that the Lord will make up for your weaknesses. Study the Book of Mormon diligently, and it will give you confidence. Fast and pray often, for it will give you spiritual strength. If you do these things, and realize that even Moses felt inadquate (and look what he did!), then you will also be blessed with abilities that exceed your own. You can be a conduit for the Spirit to touch the lives of others. In all humility. |
| QUESTION from:M. McLain, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 12/18/1997: | |
| On 7/6//97 you answered someone's question regarding the God of the OT verses the NT. I too was a little surprised when I learned that Jesus was the God of the Old Testament. What I don't understand is that how could Jesus be a God without having a body? I thought that one way we become more like God the Father, and to one day become a God is to first receive a body. I know Jesus was perfect, but why didn't he have to take all the same steps we do in order to become a God. I thought that the Father was a God of order and was no respector or persons. Thank you for your time and wonderful work!! | |
I have always believed that we are
who we are, from all eternity to
all eternity. We are progressing
but we will become what we are.
Even though (before His birth) Jesus the Christ had not been exalted yet, He still was representing and acting as God before He was born. So were others who helped him to create the earth. One might ask, can anyone besides a God create an earth? And if not, then does that not make Jesus a God even before His birth, because he created it? (see Hebrews 1:2) Joseph Smith taught: "I would just remark, that the spirits of men are eternal, that they are governed by the same Priesthood that Abraham, Melchizedek, and the Apostles were: that they are organized according to that Priesthood which is everlasting, "without beginning of days or end of years,"-that they all move in their respective spheres, and are governed by the law of God; that when they appear upon the earth they are in a probationary state, and are preparing, if righteous, for a future and greater glory..." ...indicating that the Priesthood extends forever in both directions of eternity, and that Christ and others who created the earth operated by this power. |
| QUESTION from:Kasimido, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 12/20/1997: | |
| Answerman: first of all I want to congratulate you for this site; it is grrrreat!!! I am standing firm behind you for this great work you are doing for the kingdom of God.I have like you a strong testimony of the BOM and I received that by the power of the Holy Ghost. My question is what is going to happen to the resurrected people after the millenium? Are they going to be living on earth until the Gog and Magog war? Thanks for your answer. | |
The only reason this site has a
measure of success is because of
riding on the coat-tails of Jesus
Christ and all that His servants
have done. It's not this sorry
site, but it is them! This gospel
is a hot topic, and many people
are really humbled to participate
in it.Revelation 20:8-10 describes how the saints in the New Jerusalem are protected by fire from heaven at the end of the 1000 years. There is no mention of them even lifting a sword in that event. The battles are among the wicked. There is a type of this before the Millennium as well: D&C 45:68 And it shall come to pass among the wicked, that every man that will not take his sword against his neighbor must needs flee unto Zion for safety. After the millennium Satan D&C 88:111 "shall be loosed for a little season, that he may gather together his armies. 112 And Michael, the seventh angel, even the archangel, shall gather together his armies, even the hosts of heaven. 113 And the devil shall gather together his armies; even the hosts of hell, and shall come up to battle against Michael and his armies. 114 And then cometh the battle of the great God; and the devil and his armies shall be cast away into their own place, that they shall not have power over the saints any more at all. 115 For Michael shall fight their battles, and shall overcome him who seeketh the throne of him who sitteth upon the throne, even the Lamb." I can not help but wonder what kind of battle it is, in which evil spirits, mortals, and resurrected beings such as Adam (Michael) will fight, and yet eternal beings such as Adam and Satan can not die. No doubt it must be a war like unto the war in heaven before we were born (see Rev 12:7) |
| QUESTION from:Andy Fuhriman, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 12/20/1997: | |
| My wife and I have a question concerning the Spirit world. We know that there is missionary work going on there and they are teaching the gospel, but are spirits from other religions also trying to persuade spirits to there side? They have the same opportunity to accept or reject the gospel, but are the same distractions still present on the other side that would keep them from accepting the truth? | |
We don't have details as to what
kind of distractions that people
have in the World of Spirits, but
we do know that there is good and
evil in that world as there is
here.The scriptures (D&C 138) teach that the gospel of repentance is preached "among those who are in darkness and under the bondage of sin in the great world of the spirits of the dead." (D&C 138:57) The prophet Lehi taught that there is an opposition in all things (2 Nephi 2:11), which would indicate that the "darkness" spoken of in D&C 138:57 is in opposition to the light and glory that is there also. Can you imagine the combined glory and power of all the past righteous prophets and people there together numbering in the millions upon millions? At the same time, can you imagine the combined darkness of Satan and his following as well... ...the war in heaven continues in this life, and in the Spirit World, and even until the last of the 7th Millennium when the wicked (Gog and Magog) are destroyed by fire from heaven: Revelation 20:9 And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them. |
| QUESTION from:Dennis C, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 12/21/1997: | |
| I have wondered for years why the B of M contains such a detailed record of wars with the Lamanites. Then it occurred to me a possible reason. The Nephites were always chastising the Lamanites of the "false traditions of the fathers". Can we liken these "false traditions of the fathers" to the false traditions of Christianity? I believe this is our burden as Latter-day Saints, to free the world of these false traditions and enlighten them with the truth. | |
That's an interesting analogy, but
I also believe that the accounts
in the Book of Mormon show how
hard some people had to fight to
maintain their freedom, and we may
have to do the same.I would liken the Lamanites and Gadianton Robbers to the Communist King Men in the world, who feel that they can usurp power over others, and influence a way of thinking by force, if necessary. That is what Captain Moroni and other great Book of Mormon heros were fighting against, because it would destroy their religion. Freedom is key to religion. Moroni is quoted: Alma 60:36 Behold, I am Moroni, your chief captain. I seek not for power, but to pull it down. I seek not for honor of the world, but for the glory of my God, and the freedom and welfare of my country. I love the great man Captain Moroni, and also Mormon! The great prophet Mormon (who is another great hero!), abridged the Book of Mormon and said of this Captain Moroni (and maybe it is why he named his own son Moroni!): Alma 48:17 Yea, verily, verily I say unto you, if all men had been, and were, and ever would be, like unto Moroni, behold, the very powers of hell would have been shaken forever; yea, the devil would never have power over the hearts of the children of men. 18 Behold, he was a man like unto Ammon, the son of Mosiah, yea, and even the other sons of Mosiah, yea, and also Alma and his sons, for they were all men of God. 14 Now the Nephites were taught to defend themselves against their enemies, even to the shedding of blood if it were necessary; yea, and they were also taught never to give an offense, yea, and never to raise the sword except it were against an enemy, except it were to preserve their lives. 15 And this was their faith, that by so doing God would prosper them in the land, or in other words, if they were faithful in keeping the commandments of God that he would prosper them in the land; yea, warn them to flee, or to prepare for war, according to their danger; 16 And also, that God would make it known unto them whither they should go to defend themselves against their enemies, and by so doing, the Lord would deliver them; and this was the faith of Moroni, and his heart did glory in it; not in the shedding of blood but in doing good, in preserving his people, yea, in keeping the commandments of God, yea, and resisting iniquity. |
| QUESTION from:Peter Kolb, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 12/23/1997: | |
| Great site! My question is, how come Abraham is exhalted already? Wouldn't Abraham be waiting for judgement like anyone else who has died? Thank you for your time. | |
Thanks Peter. Well, to be exalted
means to receive Celestial Glory
in a resurrected state, and you
are married for all time and
eternity (see TPJS, pp. 300-301;
D&C 132:19). This can happen
before the end of this world. It
has. Moroni is exalted.I believe that the answer to your question as to why there was an "exception" made for these great prophets and their wives...it is found here: D&C 132:37 ...[Abraham] abode in my law; as Isaac also and Jacob did none other things than that which they were commanded; and because they did none other things than that which they were commanded, they have entered into their exaltation, according to the promises, and sit upon thrones, and are not angels but are gods. It is because of their obedience that they have been exalted. Jesus was the first to be exalted, and it happened immediately after His resurrection. Many others have been exalted as well. |
| QUESTION from:Kevin Taylor, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 12/31/1997: | |
| First off, I would just like to say that I am LDS. I am not anti- Mormon, nor do I have any intentions of leaving this great church. However, I have discovered something that has been seriously troubling me. In the Book of Mormon in Alma 34:36, it says that God dwells in the heart of righteous men. But in D&C 130:3, it basically says that God does not dwell in the hearts of any man. How can this be? Thank you. | |
Don't be too troubled, for they
both are true. Your scripture
says D&C 130:3 ...the idea that the Father and the Son dwell in a man's heart is an old sectarian notion, and is false. This rings true in light of verse 22 which says that it is the Holy Ghost that dwells in us and our hearts: D&C 130:22 The Father has a body of flesh and bones as tangible as man's; the Son also; but the Holy Ghost has not a body of flesh and bones, but is a personage of Spirit. Were it not so, the Holy Ghost could not dwell in us. Since the Holy Ghost is a member of the Godhead, and has the title God, then it is possible for God to dwell in us and cause our hearts to burn. Jesus' disciples experienced this as recorded in the Bible: Luke 24:32 And they said one to another, Did not our heart burn within us, while he talked with us by the way, and while he opened to us the scriptures? That was the Holy Ghost within them! |
| QUESTION from:Diana Saenz, Non-Denominational Christian, Age 50+, wrote on 1/2/1998: | |
| Can I send my questions in Spanish or another language? | |
Yes, that would be fine as we can
translate to and from Spanish.
|
| QUESTION from:David, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 1/5/1998: | |
| I would like to comment on the question by Jay Adams (record 943). It seems the best answer for Jay's question is, that is the way the Lord intended it. For what ever reason, the destructions were to a much greater extent in the Americas, perhaps to be a "type" of the second coming. I do not believe the darkness in the Americas was the result of dust and pollution kicked up by the great destructions, for that type of darkness would not inhibit the lighting of candles or flame of any kind, even from dry kindling. "And it came to pass that there was thick darkness upon all the face of the land, insomuch that the inhabitants thereof who had not fallen could feel the vapor of darkness; And there could be no light, because of the darkness, neither candles, neither torches; neither could there be fire kindled with their fine and exceedingly dry wood, so that there could not be any light at all; And there was not any light seen, neither fire, nor glimmer, neither the sun, nor the moon, nor the stars, for so great were the mists of darkness which were upon the face of the land." (3 Nephi 8:20-22) I believe the darkness was complete and total and was made that way by the Lord, perhaps to symbolize the departure of the source of all truth and LIGHT, even God himself, from the Earth, and to remind us of our dependence on him as the source of all the light and knowledge, and perhaps also to symbolize the darkness that would cover the Earth resulting from the great apostasy yet to come. An object lesson never be forgotten by those who experienced it. | |
David:
I appreciate your statement, and
it may be true. It may have been
a miracle that can't be
explained. However, my parents while living in Alaska experienced a darkness because of volcanic ash that made it difficult to see more than 5 feet in front of you outside in the middle of the day. All activity in the area came to a virtual stop. Worse than fog, and dark. My point is, if one volcano can make it near dark, what can two volcanoes do? Or three? And when valleys are made into mountains, pour on some more ash, and when mountains are made into valleys, and cities sunk into oceans, well, it seems that there may have been so much potential for ash in the skies raining down for days, that maybe it literally took three days before it subsided or blew away with a strong "east wind" into the ocean or something. Plausible, and even interesting, because people have really experienced this sort of thing on a small scale. |
| QUESTION from:Peggy Hardy, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 1/10/1998: | |
| The family proclomation to the world is offical church policy. It states that mothers are primarly responsible for the |