| QUESTION from:jtibbs, Other Religion, Age 18-24, wrote on 9/2/1999: | |
| DO Mormons believe that eventhough someone doesn't have the athority of God, they still can use Sacred powers, such as priestcraft or withcraft? if so, is there a punishment for using witchcraft in thier life, or is it OK as long as they use discresion? | |
I would not call them sacred
powers, but evil powers. Yes they
are real. They are had in all
ages, and the Book of Mormon
records several occasions when
these began to take hold on the
people:
Mormon 1:18 And these Gadianton
robbers, who were among the
Lamanites, did infest the land,
insomuch that the inhabitants
thereof began to hide up their
treasures in the earth; and they
became slippery, because the Lord
had cursed the land, that they
could not hold them, nor retain
them again.
19 And it came to pass that
there were sorceries, and
witchcrafts, and magics; and the
power of the evil one was wrought
upon all the face of the land,
even unto the fulfilling of all
the words of Abinadi, and also
Samuel the Lamanite. Sorcery has been a sinful evil in all ages. It was present in the courts of Pharaoh (Ex. 7:11) and Nebuchadnezzar. (Dan. 2:2.) Israel's prophets inveighed against it. (Isa. 47; 57:3; Jer. 27:9.) Apostate Nephites revelled in its mysteries. (Alma 1:32; Morm. 1:19.) Peter and John fought its evils in their ministries (Acts 8:9-11; 13:6-8), and its power is prevailing with great success over much of the earth today. (Rev. 9:20-21.) Indeed, by her power and sorceries, the great and abominable church has deceived all nations in the last days. (Rev. 18:23.) (source: Mormon Doctrine, Sorcery) It is not OK to practice witchcraft, and yes there is a punishment for being on Satan's team. Hell and the second resurrection will be the result. |
| QUESTION from:Stephen NeSmith, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 9/2/1999: | |
| In Seminary today, the question came up as to whether or not a person had to be baptized in order to enter spirit paradise. The class was pretty divided. Any help that you could give would be most helpful. Thanks | |
It is a good question. What do you
think about it?Jesus told the unbaptized thief on the cross: Luke 23:43 And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise. ...and this He said to the man just before they all died and went to the Spirit World. So we see that this man went to paradise without baptism. Baptism is an ordinance that must be completed before one can enter into the Celestial Kingdom, and before their resurrection. So souls wait in the Spirit Paradise for baptisms to be done for them by proxy, in the temples of God...by a faithful mortal, a savior on Mount Zion. (see TPJS Section Four 1839-42 p.190) The prophet Alma described the Spirit World as having two parts, a Prison and a Paradise.
Alma 40:11 Now, concerning the
state of the soul between death
and the resurrection--Behold, it
has been made known unto me by an
angel, that the spirits of all
men, as soon as they are departed
from this mortal body, yea, the
spirits of all men, whether they
be good or evil, are taken home to
that God who gave them life.
12 And then shall it come to
pass, that the spirits of those
who are righteous are received
into a state of happiness, which
is called paradise, a state of
rest, a state of peace, where they
shall rest from all their troubles
and from all care, and sorrow.
13 And then shall it come to
pass, that the spirits of the
wicked, yea, who are evil--for
behold, they have no part nor
portion of the Spirit of the Lord;
for behold, they chose evil works
rather than good; therefore the
spirit of the devil did enter into
them, and take possession of their
house--and these shall be cast out
into outer darkness; there shall
be weeping, and wailing, and
gnashing of teeth, and this
because of their own iniquity,
being led captive by the will of
the devil.
14 Now this is the state of
the souls of the wicked, yea, in
darkness, and a state of awful,
fearful looking for the fiery
indignation of the wrath of God
upon them; thus they remain in
this state, as well as the
righteous in paradise, until the
time of their
resurrection. |
| QUESTION from:David Morphis, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 9/3/1999: | |
| I think I felt the Spirit but I'm not sure if it was THE "burning in the bosom". I'd like to know if this feeling should be recognizable at once and indeniable. If I'm doubting about that, doesn't it mean anyhow I have not really felt it? Thank you for your answer. | |
Yes, it is recognizable, but in
the Book of Mormon we have an
example of how the people did not
recognize immediately something
that was new to them. It was just
after great destructions and
before the Savior descended from
heaven down to the Nephites, and
the Holy Ghost was communicating
who was coming, but they didn't
get it until the third message:
3 Nephi 11:2 And [the Nephites]
were also conversing about this
Jesus Christ, of whom the sign had
been given concerning his death.
3 And it came to pass that
while they were thus conversing
one with another, they heard a
voice as if it came out of heaven;
and they cast their eyes round
about, for they understood not the
voice which they heard; and it was
not a harsh voice, neither was it
a loud voice; nevertheless, and
notwithstanding it being a small
voice it did pierce them that did
hear to the center, insomuch that
there was no part of their frame
that it did not cause to quake;
yea, it did pierce them to the
very soul, and did cause their
hearts to burn.
4 And it came to pass that
again they heard the voice, and
they understood it not.
5 And again the third time
they did hear the voice, and did
open their ears to hear it; and
their eyes were towards the sound
thereof; and they did look
steadfastly towards heaven, from
whence the sound came.
6 And behold, the third time
they did understand the voice
which they heard; and it said unto
them:
7 Behold my Beloved Son, in
whom I am well pleased, in whom I
have glorified my name--hear ye
him.
8 And it came to pass, as they
understood they cast their eyes up
again towards heaven; and behold,
they saw a Man descending out of
heaven; and he was clothed in a
white robe; and he came down and
stood in the midst of them; and
the eyes of the whole multitude
were turned upon him, and they
durst not open their mouths, even
one to another, and wist not what
it meant, for they thought it was
an angel that had appeared unto
them.
9 And it came to pass that he
stretched forth his hand and spake
unto the people, saying:
10 Behold, I am Jesus Christ,
whom the prophets testified shall
come into the world.
11 And behold, I am the light
and the life of the world; and I
have drunk out of that bitter cup
which the Father hath given me,
and have glorified the Father in
taking upon me the sins of the
world, in the which I have
suffered the will of the Father in
all things from the beginning.
12 And it came to pass that
when Jesus had spoken these words
the whole multitude fell to the
earth; for they remembered that it
had been prophesied among them
that Christ should show himself
unto them after his ascension into
heaven.
You can get a revelation and still doubt, you just have to work at not doubting. Be faithful and you will know. Laman and Lemuel saw an angel and still doubted their cause to get the plates of brass. We can get a witness, but if we don't exercise faith, then doubts can creep in. Just believe like a little child would do. |
| QUESTION from:Erin Karges, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 9/3/1999: | |
| I was wondering, do you know if marriage ceremonies can be preformed in the church building or if the church frowns on this? I know that temple marriage is strongly encouraged, but my fiancé's family is non-members and we feel that they would be extremely hurt if we were to be married without them. We do plan on going to the temple on our first anniversary, any help or advice you could give us would be greatly appreciated. Thank you | |
Erin:
You can ask your Bishop, but my advice would be to marry in the temple, not for the purpose of hurting anyone, but for the purpose of being most respectful to God's ordinances. God comes first, not family, according to the teachings of Jesus Christ. He said:
Matthew 10:36 And a man's foes
[shall be] they of his own
household.
37 He that loveth father or
mother more than me is not worthy
of me: and he that loveth son or
daughter more than me is not
worthy of me.
38 And he that taketh not his
cross, and followeth after me, is
not worthy of me. If you can go now, then do it, because you do not know what the future holds... your opportunities are now. A temple marriage is stronger than a civil marriage, the covenants are more, it is for eternity. Matthew 19:29 And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life. The purpose of these scriptures is to teach us who comes first. You would please your earthly parents and that is good, but it is our Heavenly Parents who must come first in our obedience to the commandments. We are their children. |
| QUESTION from:ricardo ascencion, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/5/1999: | |
| I need to know what can officialy be considered as doctrine besides the standard works, I know JESUS THE CHRIST is used by the missionaries and THE MIRACLE OF FORGIVENESS is recomended by bishoprics after a diciplinary action, but there are some many more books, conferences and materials that we may be taking as pure church doctrine. | |
The Apostle Bruce McConkie
taught:
Gospel doctrine is synonymous with
the truths of salvation. It
comprises the tenets, teachings,
and true theories found in the
scriptures; it includes the
principles, precepts, and revealed
philosophies of pure religion;
prophetic dogmas, maxims, and
views are embraced within its
folds; the Articles of Faith are
part and portion of it, as is
every inspired utterance of the
Lord's agents. So, anything that is truth can be doctrine. This is why we must rely on the power of the Holy Ghost to know what is true. If the living prophet teaches us "new" doctrine, how shall we know of its truth or error unless the Holy Ghost teaches us? We must rely on the Holy Ghost to let us know.
Moroni 10:5 And by the power of
the Holy Ghost ye may know the
truth of all things.
Moroni 10:4 And when ye shall
receive these things, I would
exhort you that ye would ask God,
the Eternal Father, in the name of
Christ, if these things are not
true; and if ye shall ask with a
sincere heart, with real intent,
having faith in Christ, he will
manifest the truth of it unto you,
by the power of the Holy
Ghost. |
| QUESTION from:Scott Carthew, Catholic Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/5/1999: | |
| ...I know that if people really understood the truth about the Catholic church we wouldn't have so many Churches. I do believe that many Mormons are sincere christians, and that the Catholics could probably learn a few things from Mormons. But, I also believe that the Catholic church is perfect in it's teachings and doctrines and I just wish people would take the time to study (all of them) and think about them (Catholics included). So that's where I'm coming from. Your brother in Christ--scott | |
Scott:
I think we can all learn a lot of things from each other. There is good in all churches. But there is a fulness, and there are some false doctrines in the world today. I would use the Book of Mormon prophets to illustrate truth and error. You may be aware of some of the ancient American prophetical teachings pertaining to some of the things that have also crept into the Catholic Church. Case in point: the baptism of little children. Around 400 AD the prophet Mormon taught his prophet son Moroni:
Moroni 8:5 For, if I have learned
the truth, there have been
disputations among you concerning
the baptism of your little
children.
6 And now, my son, I desire
that ye should labor diligently,
that this gross error should be
removed from among you; for, for
this intent I have written this
epistle.
7 For immediately after I had
learned these things of you I
inquired of the Lord concerning
the matter. And the word of the
Lord came to me by the power of
the Holy Ghost, saying:
8 Listen to the words of
Christ, your Redeemer, your Lord
and your God. Behold, I came into
the world not to call the
righteous but sinners to
repentance; the whole need no
physician, but they that are sick;
wherefore, little children are
whole, for they are not capable of
committing sin; wherefore the
curse of Adam is taken from them
in me, that it hath no power over
them; and the law of circumcision
is done away in me.
9 And after this manner did the
Holy Ghost manifest the word of
God unto me; wherefore, my beloved
son, I know that it is solemn
mockery before God, that ye should
baptize little children.
10 Behold I say unto you that
this thing shall ye teach--
repentance and baptism unto those
who are accountable and capable of
committing sin; yea, teach parents
that they must repent and be
baptized, and humble themselves as
their little children, and they
shall all be saved with their
little children.
11 And their little children
need no repentance, neither
baptism. Behold, baptism is unto
repentance to the fulfilling the
commandments unto the remission of
sins.
12 But little children are
alive in Christ, even from the
foundation of the world; if not
so, God is a partial God, and also
a changeable God, and a respecter
to persons; for how many little
children have died without baptism!
13 Wherefore, if little
children could not be saved
without baptism, these must have
gone to an endless hell.
14 Behold I say unto you, that
he that supposeth that little
children need baptism is in the
gall of bitterness and in the
bonds of iniquity, for he hath
neither faith, hope, nor charity;
wherefore, should he be cut off
while in the thought, he must go
down to hell.
15 For awful is the wickedness
to suppose that God saveth one
child because of baptism, and the
other must perish because he hath
no baptism.
The Lord sets clear through His
prophets in the Book of Mormon
that little children are alive in
Christ, they are pure, they are
already whole, and there is no
need to baptize them. Baptism is
unto repentance. If the Catholic
Church is teaching and practicing
this doctrine of baptism for
little children, how can it be
perfect?
|
| QUESTION from:Kevin Murphy, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 9/5/1999: | |
| What textual changes to the BoM have been made over the years in the various editions? | |
The printed
versions of the Book of Mormon
derive from two manuscripts. The
first, called the original
manuscript (O), was written by at
least three scribes as Joseph
Smith translated and dictated. The
most important scribe was Oliver
Cowdery. This manuscript was begun
no later than April 1829 and
finished in June 1829.
A copy of the original was then made by Oliver Cowdery and two other scribes. This copy is called the printer's manuscript (P), since it was the one normally used to set the type for the first (1830) edition of the Book of Mormon. It was begun in July 1829 and finished early in 1830. The printer's manuscript is not an exact copy of the original manuscript. There are on the average three changes per original manuscript page. These changes appear to be natural scribal errors; there is little or no evidence of conscious editing. Most of the changes are minor, and about one in five produca a discernible difference in meaning. Because they were all relatively minor, most of the errors thus introduced into the text have remained in the printed editions of the Book of Mormon and have not been detected and corrected except by reference to the original manuscript. About twenty of these errors were corrected in the 1981 edition. The compositor for the 1830 edition added punctuation, paragraphing, and other printing marks to about one-third of the pages of the printer's manuscript. These same marks appear on one fragment of the original, indicating that it was used at least once in typesetting the 1830 edition. In preparation for the second (1837) edition, hundreds of grammatical changes and a few textual emendations were made in P. After the publication of this edition, P was retained by Oliver Cowdery. After his death in 1850, his brother-in-law, David Whitmer, kept P until his death in 1888. In 1903 Whitmer's grandson sold P to the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which owns it today. It is wholly extant except for two lines at the bottom of the first leaf. The original manuscript was not consulted for the editing of the 1837 edition. However, in producing the 1840 edition, Joseph Smith used O to restore some of its original readings. In October 1841, Joseph Smith placed O in the cornerstone of the Nauvoo House. Over forty years later, Lewis Bidamon, Emma Smith's second husband, opened the cornerstone and found that water seepage had destroyed most of O. The surviving pages were handed out to various individuals during the 1880s. (source:Encyclopedia of Mormonism, Vol.1, BOOK OF MORMON MANUSCRIPTS) |
| QUESTION from:David Morphis, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 9/6/1999: | |
| I'd like to ask you whether "The Septuagin" and "The Vulgate" are reliable. Actually, I've learned classical Greek and Latin; I just wanted to know if they were more accurate than the KJV. By the way, could you tell me what the base was for that English translation? Thank you. | |
Well, they contain Apocryphal
writings, which Joseph Smith was
told by the Lord are not
necessarily reliable. They
contain many things which are not
true.
There has been controversy concerning the value of the Apocrypha. In 1833, while engaged in revising the King James version by the spirit of revelation, the Prophet Joseph Smith inquired of the Lord as to the authenticity of the Apocrypha. The books of the Apocrypha were inspired writings in the first instance, but subsequent interpolations/changes had perverted and twisted their original contexts.
D&C 91:1 Verily, thus saith the
Lord unto you concerning the
Apocrypha--There are many things
contained therein that are true,
and it is mostly translated
correctly;
2 There are many things
contained therein that are not
true, which are interpolations by
the hands of men.
3 Verily, I say unto you, that
it is not needful that the
Apocrypha should be translated.
4 Therefore, whoso readeth it,
let him understand, for the Spirit
manifesteth truth;
5 And whoso is enlightened by
the Spirit shall obtain benefit
therefrom;
6 And whoso receiveth not by
the Spirit, cannot be benefited.
Therefore it is not needful that
it should be translated.
Amen. The Book of Mormon is a very unique work of the Lord. It was specially prepared by one great prophet, even Mormon, as an abridgement of hundreds of prophetical records from a 1000 year period of ancient America. It was prepared specifically for our day, for this people and for the world. It was preserved in its purity, and it came forth pure as well. Today is stands as the most correct book. Joseph Smith said: I told the brethren that the Book of Mormon was the most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our religion, and a man would get nearer to God by abiding by its precepts, than by any other book. (November 28, 1841.) |
| QUESTION from:Wade, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/7/1999: | |
| In Moroni 8:18 it talks about God being "unchangeable from all eternity to all eternity." Apparently this is suppose to contradict the church in that it is LDS belief that God was once mortal. How should us christians respond to this when asked by our baptist friends? | |
Moroni 8:18 For I know that God is
not a partial God, neither a
changeable being; but he is
unchangeable from all eternity to
all eternity.To me this is talking about the personality of God, not His physical being. He doesn't respect people in a partial way, and He can be counted on as a constant in His perfection. He will always be true to his word. He doesn't change His colors, so to speak. He is a constant for us. Now we know that Jesus Christ came to this earth. That was a physical change. So we know that this is not what the scripture means. It can not be talking about His physical being, but rather His nature as God. That has and always will be a constant, from all eternity to eternity. |
| QUESTION from:Sam Newton, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 9/7/1999: | |
| What is the position of the Church on Capital Punishment? | |
Articles of
Faith 1212 We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law. In the Book of Mormon days, capital punishment was in place. In fact the "socialists" of that time, or "King Men" were put to death under certain circumstances:
Alma 62:9 And the men of Pachus
received their trial, according to
the law, and also those king-men
who had been taken and cast into
prison; and they were executed
according to the law; yea, those
men of Pachus and those king-men,
whosoever would not take up arms
in the defence of their country,
but would fight against it, were
put to death.
10 And thus it became
expedient that this law should be
strictly observed for the safety
of their country; yea, and
whosoever was found denying their
freedom was speedily executed
according to the law. Let us hope that in our day, we can maintain the safety of our country, even while there are those among us who seek to destroy the Constitution of the Land, and implement other means of gaining power, because of their secret combinations. Moroni taught US:
Ether 8:24 Wherefore, the Lord
commandeth you, when ye shall see
these things come among you that
ye shall awake to a sense of your
awful situation, because of this
secret combination which shall be
among you; or wo be unto it,
because of the blood of them who
have been slain; for they cry from
the dust for vengeance upon it,
and also upon those who built it
up.
25 For it cometh to pass that
whoso buildeth it up seeketh to
overthrow the freedom of all
lands, nations, and countries; and
it bringeth to pass the
destruction of all people, for it
is built up by the devil, who is
the father of all lies; even that
same liar who beguiled our first
parents, yea, even that same liar
who hath caused man to commit
murder from the beginning; who
hath hardened the hearts of men
that they have murdered the
prophets, and stoned them, and
cast them out from the beginning.
26 Wherefore, I, Moroni, am
commanded to write these things
that evil may be done away, and
that the time may come that Satan
may have no power upon the hearts
of the children of men, but that
they may be persuaded to do good
continually, that they may come
unto the fountain of all
righteousness and be
saved. And so this is our charge, to see that these things are done away, and then comes the second coming of Christ, when evil will be done away. |
| QUESTION from:Steve, Protestant Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/7/1999: | |
| Mormons believe that there is a godhead governed by three completely separate entities - The Father, Son and Holy Spirit. Explain that: Jesus is the Father and the Son. I don't mean this to be an antagonistic question, I just got done reading something on the Godhead, but am confused on this other point. | |
You mention that Jesus is the
Father and the Son. This is taught
in the Book of Mormon, but Jesus
is not the Holy Ghost. What about
the Holy Ghost? If He is separate
from Jesus Christ, then why not
all three separate beings? They
are. Yet they are one God. The
mystery is in the meaning of the
word "one" and it means one in
purpose, perfectly united in
cause.Here is how Jesus is the Father and the Son, as taught in the Book of Mormon by the prophet Abinadi:
Mosiah 15:1 AND now Abinadi said
unto them: I would that ye should
understand that God himself shall
come down among the children of
men, and shall redeem his people.
2 And because he dwelleth in
flesh he shall be called the Son
of God, and having subjected the
flesh to the will of the Father,
being the Father and the Son--
3 The Father, because he was
conceived by the power of God; and
the Son, because of the flesh;
thus becoming the Father and Son--
4 And they are one God, yea,
the very Eternal Father of heaven
and of earth.
5 And thus the flesh becoming
subject to the Spirit, or the Son
to the Father, being one God,
suffereth temptation, and yieldeth
not to the temptation, but
suffereth himself to be mocked,
and scourged, and cast out, and
disowned by his people.
6 And after all this, after
working many mighty miracles among
the children of men, he shall be
led, yea, even as Isaiah said, as
a sheep before the shearer is
dumb, so he opened not his mouth.
7 Yea, even so he shall be
led, crucified, and slain, the
flesh becoming subject even unto
death, the will of the Son being
swallowed up in the will of the
Father.
8 And thus God breaketh the
bands of death, having gained the
victory over death; giving the Son
power to make intercession for the
children of men--
9 Having ascended into heaven,
having the bowels of mercy; being
filled with compassion towards the
children of men; standing betwixt
them and justice; having broken
the bands of death, taken upon
himself their iniquity and their
transgressions, having redeemed
them, and satisfied the demands of
justice. |
| QUESTION from:Dan Beall, Non-Denominational Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 9/7/1999: | |
| Is there any archaeological or historical proof for the Book of Mormon? Why are animals like horses and cattle mentioned in the Book of Mormon? It is a known fact that these animals were not present in the Americas until the 16th century. What about the origin of the American Indians? Isn't it true that they are of Asian origin and not Hebrew? Sincerely, Dan Beall | |
It is a known _theory_ that they
were not here. But to state it as
a fact, when it is merely the
conclusions of people lacking
evidences, is not correct. We have many theories of men which have yet to be proven false, but they are yet theories. They may be true, they may be false, but we use our faith to either believe or disbelieve them. Now my faith tells me that the Book of Mormon is true. There were horses here, and cattle, and Nephi, and Lehi, and Jesus Christ did walk this land too! The book is miraculous, and God tells us it is true if we read it and ask Him in the name of Christ. That is our evidence. Enos 1:15 Wherefore, I knowing that the Lord God was able to preserve our records, I cried unto him continually, for he had said unto me: Whatsoever thing ye shall ask in faith, believing that ye shall receive in the name of Christ, ye shall receive it. This Book of Mormon record WAS preserved by the power of God, and it did come forth in our day, and it is going forth to the Lamanites as well. To find out if this record is true, and the theories of man are therefore false, all one needs to do is put God to the test:
Mormon 9:21 Behold, I say unto you
that whoso believeth in Christ,
doubting nothing, whatsoever he
shall ask the Father in the name
of Christ it shall be granted him;
and this promise is unto all, even
unto the ends of the earth.
Moroni 10:4 And when ye shall
receive these things, I would
exhort you that ye would ask God,
the Eternal Father, in the name of
Christ, if these things are not
true; and if ye shall ask with a
sincere heart, with real intent,
having faith in Christ, he will
manifest the truth of it unto you,
by the power of the Holy Ghost.
5 And by the power of the Holy
Ghost ye may know the truth of all
things.
|
| QUESTION from:Linda Fleming, Born Again Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 9/8/1999: | |
| Hi. I have a question about the priesthood. It has always been a mystery to me. When I read about it in the Bible its function sounds totally different than what I understand it to mean in the LDS church. Could you clarify it for me. e.g. in Hebrews 5 it lists the duties of a priest and in Hebrews 7:24 it says that the priesthood of Jesus is unchangeable or in the Greek untransmittable meaning it cannot be passed from one person to another. LINDA | |
That particular scripture is
speaking specifically about Jesus
Christ. I would not imagine that
this high and holy Priesthood
calling that Jesus had/has could
be passed to another. It was only
He who could accomplish his
mission. He was endowed with
special Godly powers from God His
Father, and could tread the wine
press alone, and be victorious
over death and hell.
Mosiah 15:7 Yea, even so [Christ]
shall be led, crucified, and
slain, the flesh becoming subject
even unto death, the will of the
Son being swallowed up in the will
of the Father.
8 And thus God breaketh the bands
of death, having gained the
victory over death; giving the Son
power to make intercession for the
children of men--
D&C 88:106 And again, another
angel shall sound his trump, which
is the seventh angel, saying: It
is finished; it is finished! The
Lamb of God hath overcome and
trodden the wine-press alone, even
the wine-press of the fierceness
of the wrath of Almighty God.
Now as pertaining to the rest of us, Jesus has commissioned Apostles with Priesthood to take the gospel to all the world.
Mark 16:15 And he said unto them,
Go ye into all the world, and
preach the gospel to every
creature.
16 He that believeth and is
baptized shall be saved; but he
that believeth not shall be damned.
Thus we see that belief and baptism are both necessary to be saved. Faith and works. Faith without works is dead. The Priesthood, which those Apostles held, was passed on to them from Jesus Christ, by the laying on of hands (see 1 Timothy 4:14). He commissioned them to do His work. Paul was trying to teach (in Hebrews) the deadness of the Law of Moses which was fulfilled in Christ. He was not trying to teach the deadness of the Priesthood to us, only in the older ordinances of the Levitical Priesthood which were fulfilled in Christ. Certainly there were Jews in that day who had trouble accepting these monumental changes in doctrine and practice! But the Melchizedek Priesthood continued. Peter taught in later years:
1 Peter 2:9 But ye [are] a chosen
generation, a royal priesthood, an
holy nation, a peculiar people;
that ye should shew forth the
praises of him who hath called you
out of darkness into his
marvellous light.
also
Ephesians 4:11 And he gave some,
apostles; and some, prophets; and
some, evangelists; and some,
pastors and teachers;
12 For the perfecting of the
saints, for the work of the
ministry, for the edifying of the
body of Christ:
13 Till we all come in the
unity of the faith, and of the
knowledge of the Son of God, unto
a perfect man, unto the measure of
the stature of the fulness of
Christ:
14 That we [henceforth] be no
more children, tossed to and fro,
and carried about with every wind
of doctrine, by the sleight of
men, [and] cunning craftiness,
whereby they lie in wait to
deceive;
Jesus passed it on! His Priesthood is forever, and He is still working through weak man to preach His word, and these servants must hold His Priesthood authority to do this work. It continues even through our day and will continue forever. |
| QUESTION from:Bob, Born Again Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/10/1999: | |
| How does the LDS explian the contradition in the Book of Mormon about being "Saved"? It says in the b of m when jesus appered to the "nephites" he told them you must believe in him and be baptized to be saved The Bible teaches we need to believe in him only!! and we are saved How do you you explian this matter? Thanks for your time | |
That is what many churches teach
today, but it is not what that
Bible teaches. When I read the
Bible, I see that even Jesus
Christ Himself was baptized to
fulfill all righteousness. Yet we
have preachers going about today
stating that we do not need to be
baptized, but it is an outward
expression. This may be their
opinion, but it is better to
follow the example of Jesus Christ
and not question what we must do.
The truly repentant in the New
Testament submitted to baptism.One of the greatest prophets who ever lived, Nephi, taught us what God taught him: how important it is to follow the example of the Savior and be baptized after true repentance:
2 Nephi 31:11 And the Father said:
Repent ye, repent ye, and be
baptized in the name of my Beloved
Son.
12 And also, the voice of the
Son came unto me, saying: He that
is baptized in my name, to him
will the Father give the Holy
Ghost, like unto me; wherefore,
follow me, and do the things which
ye have seen me do.
13 Wherefore, my beloved
brethren, I know that if ye shall
follow the Son, with full purpose
of heart, acting no hypocrisy and
no deception before God, but with
real intent, repenting of your
sins, witnessing unto the Father
that ye are willing to take upon
you the name of Christ, by
baptism--yea, by following your
Lord and your Savior down into the
water, according to his word,
behold, then shall ye receive the
Holy Ghost; yea, then cometh the
baptism of fire and of the Holy
Ghost; and then can ye speak with
the tongue of angels, and shout
praises unto the Holy One of
Israel.
14 But, behold, my beloved
brethren, thus came the voice of
the Son unto me, saying: After ye
have repented of your sins, and
witnessed unto the Father that ye
are willing to keep my
commandments, by the baptism of
water, and have received the
baptism of fire and of the Holy
Ghost, and can speak with a new
tongue, yea, even with the tongue
of angels, and after this should
deny me, it would have been better
for you that ye had not known me.
15 And I heard a voice from
the Father, saying: Yea, the words
of my Beloved are true and
faithful. He that endureth to the
end, the same shall be saved.
16 And now, my beloved brethren,
I know by this that unless a man
shall endure to the end, in
following the example of the Son
of the living God, he cannot be
saved. |
| QUESTION from:Brad, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 9/11/1999: | |
| I have a couple of questions
stemming from my
reading of the 9th chapter of 2
Nephi. The author says that "where there is no law given there is no punishment... for the atonement satisfieth the demands of his justice upon those who have not the law given unto them". What does it mean to have the law "given" unto you? Often in the scriptures it seems to refer to those who heard so-and-so preaching and disregarded his/her advice as wicked. Were they "given" the law even if they were given no reason to adhere to it, having never sought and recieved a witness from the spirit? I understand that sinning against the holy ghost, or having made and then knowingly broken a baptismal covenant, is a transgression of God's law (where much is given, much is expected and so on) but what about transgressing laws that, at least in this world, one never studied seriously enough to covenant to keep? We are constantly in transgression of someone's interperetation of God's law and without a witness from the spirit one has no reason to treat our version any differently than anyone else's. So I guess the short version of my question is "Are my nonmember friends going to suffer for transgressions that they made against a law they did not know was God-given?" I guess it is obvious from the phrasing of my question what I would like the answer to it to be but I am more interested in the Truth than what is easiest for me to accept. Whatever your answer, I do not want opinions. I would be interested in scriptural references and/or quotes from the Presidency as I have been unable to find any that really clarify this so far. Thanks very much in advance. This will mean a lot to me. --Brad | |
It is about accountability based
on how much light and truth has
been revealed. Here is the
scripture:
2 Nephi 9:23 And he commandeth all
men that they must repent, and be
baptized in his name, having
perfect faith in the Holy One of
Israel, or they cannot be saved in
the kingdom of God.
24 And if they will not repent
and believe in his name, and be
baptized in his name, and endure
to the end, they must be damned;
for the Lord God, the Holy One of
Israel, has spoken it.
25 Wherefore, he has given a
law; and where there is no law
given there is no punishment; and
where there is no punishment there
is no condemnation; and where
there is no condemnation the
mercies of the Holy One of Israel
have claim upon them, because of
the atonement; for they are
delivered by the power of him.
26 For the atonement
satisfieth the demands of his
justice upon all those who have
not the law given to them, that
they are delivered from that awful
monster, death and hell, and the
devil, and the lake of fire and
brimstone, which is endless
torment; and they are restored to
that God who gave them breath,
which is the Holy One of Israel.
27 But wo unto him that has
the law given, yea, that has all
the commandments of God, like unto
us, and that transgresseth them,
and that wasteth the days of his
probation, for awful is his state!
People are responsibile and accountable for what they hear, no matter who the messenger. We should not be a respecter of persons, because God isn't (Acts 10:34) The spirit of Christ is given to all people that they may know good from evil. If they ignore this spirit of Christ, the Holy Ghost, they will be held accountable.
The prophet Moroni wrote:
Moroni 7:16 For behold, the Spirit
of Christ is given to every man,
that he may know good from evil;
wherefore, I show unto you the way
to judge; for every thing which
inviteth to do good, and to
persuade to believe in Christ, is
sent forth by the power and gift
of Christ; wherefore ye may know
with a perfect knowledge it is of
God.
17 But whatsoever thing
persuadeth men to do evil, and
believe not in Christ, and deny
him, and serve not God, then ye
may know with a perfect knowledge
it is of the devil; for after this
manner doth the devil work, for he
persuadeth no man to do good, no,
not one; neither do his angels;
neither do they who subject
themselves unto him.
18 And now, my brethren,
seeing that ye know the light by
which ye may judge, which light is
the light of Christ, see that ye
do not judge wrongfully; for with
that same judgment which ye judge
ye shall also be judged.
and King Benjamin spoke:
Mosiah 3:19 For the natural man is
an enemy to God, and has been from
the fall of Adam, and will be,
forever and ever, unless he yields
to the enticings of the Holy
Spirit, and putteth off the
natural man and becometh a saint
through the atonement of Christ
the Lord, and becometh as a child,
submissive, meek, humble, patient,
full of love, willing to submit to
all things which the Lord seeth
fit to inflict upon him, even as a
child doth submit to his father.
Studying seriously enough or not is a choice we make. If we wrest the scriptures, that is a choice too, for which we will be held acountable. 2 Peter 3:16 ...they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as [they do] also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction. The scriptures make it plain that obedience to the Spirit of God is something that all people will be held accountable for. God gave the word, even if through a weak vessel, and it stands. |
| QUESTION from:A.J. VAN DINE, Non-Denominational Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/11/1999: | |
| From my understanding the LDS church is the restored true church of Christ, that was in need of restoration due to a complete apostosy which resulted in the removal of the priest hood from the earth. My question is if the BOM is to be believed then how could this apostosy have taken place? because 3 Nephi 28:7-9 says "Therefore, more blessed are ye,for ye shall live to behold all the doings of the FATHER unto the children of men, even until all things shall be fulfilled according to the will of the Father, when I shall come in my glory with the powers of heaven. And ye shall never endure the pains of death; but when I shall come in my glory ye shall be changed in the twinkling of an eye from mortality to immortality; and then shall ye be blessed in the kingdom of my Father. And again,ye shall not have pain while ye dwell in the flesh, niether sorrow save it be for the sins of the world; and all this will I do because of the thing ye have desired of me, for ye have desired that ye might bring the souls of men unto me, while the world shall stand." As I said earlier I don't understand how there was a need for restoration. If these three men had the fullness of the Gospel and were promised by Christ himself that they would live until He came in His glory, to bring Him the souls of men, how could there be a complete apostosy? And again if the BOM is the most correct book on earth how is it that it seemingly contradicts the very foundation that the LDS church is based on? | |
The three Nephites who were
translated or transformed into an
immortal state, are not in the
same category as mankind in
general! They are as the angels.
There have always been angels in
the world, waiting to communicate
with righteous individuals, but
that does not necessarily a Church
make.Since God's Church is for mankind (sinners), not for the inhabitants of heaven or those who have already passed their test, then the three Nephites were not part of a Church. They were as angels. 3 Nephi 28:30 And [the three Nephites] are as the angels of God, and if they shall pray unto the Father in the name of Jesus they can show themselves unto whatsoever man it seemeth them good. They have the job of angels. It is different. Angels minister to mankind, but that does not necessarily mean that there is a Church or authority among mankind (priesthood). When God calls a prophet either directly or through an angel, they may be getting a message that will come to fruition in later years. Case in point: Moses, Joseph Smith, etc. Each waited for many years after their initial communications with God before any Church was established, or when priesthood was received. |
| QUESTION from:Mark, Non-Denominational Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 9/12/1999: | |
| Hello. I was going through some webpages about LDS beliefs on the Bible, and some comments about "Other inspired writings" that are now lost caught my eye. I've allways been interested in biblical apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha. I was wondering if the LDS church has in the past, or plans to go through and do a major study on all currently known works under these catagories and attempt to assemble a collection of works that might have also been inspired. Perhaps works that have been long neglected by churches who keep to a strict closed canon might actuly shed ned light on some topics. Just a general curiosity. Mark | |
I don't know if any studies are
forthcoming, but I do know that
the Book of Mormon most definitely
qualifies for your curiosity. It
is most definitely additional
writings of prophets not contained
in our present day Bible, but even
more. The Book of Mormon was
prepared by a prophet (Mormon) who
took small portions of the
writings of other prophets over a
1,000 year time period, and
condensed or abridged the
records. It was created
specifically for OUR day. I hope
that you can read it.
|
| QUESTION from:David Bradly Christensen, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 9/13/1999: | |
| I need help. I am trying to teach a muslim about my religion. it is very hard because i need to convert him to christianity first. do you have any suggestions for me. | |
The Book of Mormon contains an
account of Ammon, and his
brethren, who went among the
Lamanites to try and be the means
by which salvation in Christ could
come to a few of them. Thousands
were converted. Thousands of
people who never believed in Jesus
Christ and who were wicked and
delighted in bloodshed, etc. The question is, HOW did Ammon accomplish this... His brothers went up and began to teach the word, and they were promptly locked up in prison and tortured with hunger and nakedness. Ammon, on the other hand, desired to be a servant of the King Lamoni, and he waited patiently for the right opportunity. When it was right, he shared the word. We can learn from this. Service to others softens hearts, creates opportunities, and provides chances for these people to "see your light" that it may shine on a hill and not be hid. "Let your light so shine that others may see your good works and glorify your Father which is in heaven." Setting the right example, patience, and always looking for that opportunity by following the Spirit. The Lord knows these people, He knows all people. He will inspire you with what to do and when to do it. Service is the key in this case. |
| QUESTION from:Marinda Geter, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/13/1999: | |
| I have a question of race in the book of 2 Nephi 5:21-23 there is a reference to race and skinned turned black as flint and the seed being cursed if mixed what race are they talking of? and show me in the Bible where this holds up to doctrine. I Joseph Smith had to first search the scriptures of the Bible to find truth where is it listed in there. | |
2 Nephi 5:20 Wherefore, the word
of the Lord was fulfilled which he
spake unto me, saying that:
Inasmuch as they will not hearken
unto thy words they shall be cut
off from the presence of the Lord.
And behold, they were cut off from
his presence.
21 And he had caused the cursing to come upon them, yea, even a sore cursing, because of their iniquity. For behold, they had hardened their hearts against him, that they had become like unto a flint; wherefore, as they were white, and exceedingly fair and delightsome, that they might not be enticing unto my people the Lord God did cause a skin of blackness to come upon them. 22 And thus saith the Lord God: I will cause that they shall be loathsome unto thy people, save they shall repent of their iniquities. This is not the first time the Lord has changed skin colors, in the Book of Mormon. It took place a long time ago in the Old Testament as well. As we know from the record, our first parents of the human race were Adam and Eve. What race were they? Nobody knows. But this much we do know, our children who are born to us look like we do. How then did there come to be so many races and languages on this earth? If God can make the changes that He did at the Tower of Babel, even to the extent of changing languages, then why would we deny that He could make a change to small group of the families of the wicked brothers of Nephi, and call them Lamanites? He did make the change, but it was for the purpose of separating the people of God from those that hated God. The way that I look at the issue of "race" is to understand and know that we are all of the same race, even that of the children of God. We are His offspring literally, and we have God the Father as our Father. He is the Father of our spirits. So, we are all of the same family and "race" as a result of the Pre-mortal existence, where we previously lived with God the Father. But this is another topic, even one about the Plan of Salvation. |
| QUESTION from:janice peacock, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 50+, wrote on 9/13/1999: | |
| can you tell me what it means to be santified, i hear that we must become sanctified. thanks for your help | |
Moroni 10:32 Yea, come unto
Christ, and be perfected in him,
and deny yourselves of all
ungodliness; and if ye shall deny
yourselves of all ungodliness and
love God with all your might, mind
and strength, then is his grace
sufficient for you, that by his
grace ye may be perfect in Christ;
and if by the grace of God ye are
perfect in Christ, ye can in
nowise deny the power of God.
33 And again, if ye by the grace of God are perfect in Christ, and deny not his power, then are ye sanctified in Christ by the grace of God, through the shedding of the blood of Christ, which is in the covenant of the Father unto the remission of your sins, that ye become holy, without spot. Sanctification is the process of becoming a saint, holy and spiritually clean and pure, by purging all sin from the soul. The power of the Holy Ghost purifies the heart and gives an abhorrence of sin: Alma 13:12 Now they, after being sanctified by the Holy Ghost, having their garments made white, being pure and spotless before God, could not look upon sin save it were with abhorrence; and there were many, exceedingly great many, who were made pure and entered into the rest of the Lord their God. King Benjamin's people in the Book of Mormon illustrate the sanctification process. They humbled themselves and prayed mightily that God would apply the atoning blood of Christ and purify their hearts. The Spirit came upon them and filled them with joy; a mighty change came into their hearts and they had "no more disposition to do evil, but to do good continually".
Mosiah 5:1 AND now, it came to
pass that when king Benjamin had
thus spoken to his people, he sent
among them, desiring to know of
his people if they believed the
words which he had spoken unto
them.
2 And they all cried with one
voice, saying: Yea, we believe all
the words which thou hast spoken
unto us; and also, we know of
their surety and truth, because of
the Spirit of the Lord Omnipotent,
which has wrought a mighty change
in us, or in our hearts, that we
have no more disposition to do
evil, but to do good continually.
3 And we, ourselves, also,
through the infinite goodness of
God, and the manifestations of his
Spirit, have great views of that
which is to come; and were it
expedient, we could prophesy of
all things.
4 And it is the faith which we
have had on the things which our
king has spoken unto us that has
brought us to this great
knowledge, whereby we do rejoice
with such exceedingly great joy.
5 And we are willing to enter
into a covenant with our God to do
his will, and to be obedient to
his commandments in all things
that he shall command us, all the
remainder of our days, that we may
not bring upon ourselves a never-
ending torment, as has been spoken
by the angel, that we may not
drink out of the cup of the wrath
of God.
6 And now, these are the words
which king Benjamin desired of
them; and therefore he said unto
them: Ye have spoken the words
that I desired; and the covenant
which ye have made is a righteous
covenant.
7 And now, because of the
covenant which ye have made ye
shall be called the children of
Christ, his sons, and his
daughters; for behold, this day he
hath spiritually begotten you; for
ye say that your hearts are
changed through faith on his name;
therefore, ye are born of him and
have become his sons and his
daughters. |
| QUESTION from:Gary Mercer, Baptist Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 9/13/1999: | |
| Do you think more people will go to heaven or to hell? I have always been taught most people will turn from God and will not be saved. I have a little problem with this if you think in the secular aspects of "score". I may be way off base, but if Satan is able to sway more people to his evil ways and thus condemnation to hell, than didn't he in fact win over good. If more people end up in hell than heaven, than I see that Satan wins the war here on this earth. I apologize for the use of this analogy. I have no intention of blasmphemy. Thank you in advance for your answer. | |
Well, if "winning" means to burn
in hell foever, who wants to
"win?" Truly Satan has lost
already because he was cast out.
He is not in control over the Plan
of Salvation, God is, and He can
stop Satan whenever he pleases, or
rather, whenever His people choose
to ignore the devil. It is to the
advantage of the Plan of Salvation
to have opposition in all things,
that way the people can have a
choice to choose between good and
evil. Satan is a willing
participant, even though he has
not hope of gaining anything
except comisery. Lehi taught:
2 Nephi 2:11 For it must needs be,
that there is an opposition in all
things. If not so ...
righteousness could not be brought
to pass, neither wickedness,
neither holiness nor misery,
neither good nor bad. Wherefore,
all things must needs be a
compound in one; wherefore, if it
should be one body it must needs
remain as dead, having no life
neither death, nor corruption nor
incorruption, happiness nor
misery, neither sense nor
insensibility.
12 Wherefore, it must needs
have been created for a thing of
naught; wherefore there would have
been no purpose in the end of its
creation. Wherefore, this thing
must needs destroy the wisdom of
God and his eternal purposes, and
also the power, and the mercy, and
the justice of God.
13 And if ye shall say there
is no law, ye shall also say there
is no sin. If ye shall say there
is no sin, ye shall also say there
is no righteousness. And if there
be no righteousness there be no
happiness. And if there be no
righteousness nor happiness there
be no punishment nor misery. And
if these things are not there is
no God. And if there is no God we
are not, neither the earth; for
there could have been no creation
of things, neither to act nor to
be acted upon; wherefore, all
things must have vanished away.
14 And now, my sons, I speak
unto you these things for your
profit and learning; for there is
a God, and he hath created all
things, both the heavens and the
earth, and all things that in them
are, both things to act and things
to be acted upon.
15 And to bring about his
eternal purposes in the end of
man, after he had created our
first parents, and the beasts of
the field and the fowls of the
air, and in fine, all things which
are created, it must needs be that
there was an opposition; even the
forbidden fruit in opposition to
the tree of life; the one being
sweet and the other bitter.
16 Wherefore, the Lord God
gave unto man that he should act
for himself. Wherefore, man could
not act for himself save it should
be that he was enticed by the one
or the other.
17 And I, Lehi, according to
the things which I have read, must
needs suppose that an angel of
God, according to that which is
written, had fallen from heaven;
wherefore, he became a devil,
having sought that which was evil
before God.
18 And because he had fallen
from heaven, and had become
miserable forever, he sought also
the misery of all
mankind. Numbers or "score" do not make the difference between winning and losing in the Plan of Salvation. God has already won. There is no contest anymore. God has allowed Satan to act, as a tempter, and Satan does not force this choice on the Father. He is just a necessary element of the plan. It is not a true "war" anymore, because God has already won, when He cast Satan out of heaven. Jesus proved who has power over Satan, when He cast him out while on this earth. |
| QUESTION from:Michael A. Riggsby, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 9/13/1999: | |
| ok here it is: you used to have to wait until you where 21 to go on your mission, now you can go when you turn 19... my queston is when was it changed, and who changed it. if you can answer this for me it will be very helpful... thanks | |
People have been called to
missions at a variety of ages.
Mormon was 10 years old when he
was called.
Mormon 1:2 And about the time that
Ammaron hid up the records unto
the Lord, he came unto me, (I
being about ten years of age, and
I began to be learned somewhat
after the manner of the learning
of my people) and Ammaron said
unto me: I perceive that thou art
a sober child, and art quick to
observe;
3 Therefore, when ye are about
twenty and four years old I would
that ye should remember the things
that ye have observed concerning
this people; and when ye are of
that age go to the land Antum,
unto a hill which shall be called
Shim; and there have I deposited
unto the Lord all the sacred
engravings concerning this people.
17 But I did remain among
them, but I was forbidden to
preach unto them, because of the
hardness of their hearts; and
because of the hardness of their
hearts the land was cursed for
their sake. At 16 Mormon was appointed by the people of Nephi to be the leader over their armies. Mormon was an extremely awesome individual. As a youth, he led the nation. In 1855, Elder Joseph F. Smith (son of Hyrum Smith), was appointed to preside on the island of Maui with Sixtus E. Johnson and Simpson A. Molen as assistants. At this time he was but sixteen years of age, when called to succeed Elder Francis A. Hammond in conducting the affairs of the mission in Maui. This was a grave responsibility for one so young, nevertheless he was greatly respected by his brethren and all with whom he came in contact. The ages and terms of service of full-time missionaries have varied over the years, and exceptions are made according to circumstance. In 1990, unmarried men ages nineteen through twenty-five, or occasionally older, were called to serve for twenty-four months. Unmarried women ages twenty-one through thirty-nine were called to serve for eighteen months, and those age forty through sixty-nine were called to serve for twelve months. Married couples normally served for either twelve or eighteen months. (source: Encyclopedia of Mormonism, Vol.2, MISSIONS) |
| QUESTION from:James, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/14/1999: | |
| Hello Answerman, I have very much enjoyed reading the Q&A's on the site. It has been informative and reaffirming to me. I am submitting a exerpt from a letter I received from a female freind who is black and with whom we have discussed gospel topics and I have testified to her. I am requesting some help in the delicate manner of responding honestly. Here it is: "1 Nephi 12:23, 2 Nephi 5:21, Jacob 3:5, Alma 3:6- 9, Mormon 5:15, and in the 1830 edition, 2 Nephi 30:6--- all portray a white or light skin as a sign of righteousness and a black or dark skin was a sign of unrighteousness. These scriptures are still used by Mormons. You also believe that Cain conversed with his God daily and knew about the plan of creating this earth. But through jealousy killed his brother. Then that the Lord put a mark on him and when all the other children of Adam have had the privilege of receiving the Priesthood, and of coming into the Kingdom of God, and of being redeemed from the four quarters of the earth, and have received their resurrection from the dead, then it will be time enough to remove the curse from Cain and his posterity. Brigham Young stated in October 1859 in the Journal of Discourses 7:290-291 that "You see some classes of the human family that are black, uncouth, uncomely, disagreeable and low in their habits, wild, and seemingly deprived of nearly all the blessings of the intelligence that is generally bestowed upon mankind..How long is that race to endure the dreadful curse that is upon them? That curse will remain upon them, and they NEVER can hold the Priesthood or share in it until all the other descendants of Adam have received the promises and enjoyed the blessings of the Priesthood and the keys thereof. Until the last ones of the residue of Adam's children are brought up to that favorable position, the children of Cain cannot receive the first ordinances of the Priesthood." Then in March of 1863 he said that if the white man who belongs to the chosen seed mixes his blood with the seed of Cain, the penalty, under the law of God, is death on the spot. This will always be so." Joseph Smith said in the Doctrines of Salvation in 1954; 1:61, 65-66 that there is a reason why one man is born black and with other disadvantages, while another is born white with great advantages. The reason is that we once had an estate before we came here, and were obedient, more or less, to the laws that were given us there. Those who were faithful in all things there received greater blessings here, and those who were not faithful received less." Tell me James, does this sound like something a loving God would say or do? This is a disgrace to my people, to me, how can you love me and keep this from me, that really hurts me James. Although your church does not talk about this anymore, these teachings are all still in place. According to your very own Scriptures, white is righteous, clean, pure; black or dark is inrighteous, dirty, impure." So, I am a member of three years and have a strong testimony but have yet to answer to any such charges. So, is there a definitive statement on mixed marriages as we would think of them generally today? Are there other materials that address this subject more fully? Thanks for your response. James | |
Thanks!In that same talk, Brigham Young said "For their abuse of that race, the whites will be cursed, unless they repent." It is good to read the whole thing. (Journal of Discourses, Vol.10, p.110, Brigham Young, March 8, 1863). Brigham Young said many things that were all true. He was right. He was always right. But it is hard to take when we have so much political correctness today to get everybody up in arms and offended at certain words. When Brigham Young taught that death on the spot was the penalty, he was referring to the Law of Moses, and when the people were governed by ecclesiastical authority (the Church). Death for adultery was in place, death for touching Mount Sinai, death for murder, cursing your father or mother, a lot of things got death as the penalty! But today, we are all governed not by our prophets directly, but by the Constitution and the laws of the land. It would be good if there was a penalty for adultery, it sure is needed! Anciently it was death. My take on all of those things that she mentions is that they are all true, but it is important to understand the context of everything. The Book of Mormon DID contain specific accounts of where people's skin color did change according to their wickedness or righteousness. But that was that people. This does not mean that today skin color has ANY bearing on personal righteousness. It was how the Lord handled the separation of these people in that day (Nephites and Lamanites from 600 BC to 421 AD). It provided ample opportunity for the Lord to allow the enemies of the Nephites (the Lamanites) to stir them up unto repentance by warring against them. It worked many times. People were smitten. People were humbled. People repented. The Lord certainly knew what he was doing to keep a covenant people of the Lord for over 1000 years! The Church has no policy on mixed marriages at all. There is no law against it. In the days of Brigham Young, however, the issue was slightly more volatile, and over 1,000,000 men died as a result of the Civil War. Brigham Young was wise to stay away from the volatile issue of the slave question. They had enough trouble with polygamy! |
| QUESTION from:Paula Arnts, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 9/14/1999: | |
| Sometimes you guys have no idea how much you touch those of us with problems just by replying to others with questions. I have been confused and unhappy about a certain situation with tithing and by reading your loving spiritual answers to others have re-established strength to just do as HE would want and pay my tithing and worry about the others later. You will surely be blessed by our sweet Lord for the love and guidance you bring to all of us. From Australia I send my love, deepest gratitude and call upon the Lords blessings for all of you for a lifetime. | |
Paula:
Your kind comments have been
noted. Thanks. The Book of Mormon
scripture is so helpful to us all,
it has the answers. God inspired
those prophets then to write what
they wrote, and it is God's
message to us in these latter
days. Here is Moroni's farewell
to all who would read it:
Moroni 10:30 And again I would
exhort you that ye would come unto
Christ, and lay hold upon every
good gift, and touch not the evil
gift, nor the unclean thing.
31 And awake, and arise from
the dust, O Jerusalem; yea, and
put on thy beautiful garments, O
daughter of Zion; and strengthen
thy stakes and enlarge thy borders
forever, that thou mayest no more
be confounded, that the covenants
of the Eternal Father which he
hath made unto thee, O house of
Israel, may be fulfilled.
32 Yea, come unto Christ, and
be perfected in him, and deny
yourselves of all ungodliness; and
if ye shall deny yourselves of all
ungodliness and love God with all
your might, mind and strength,
then is his grace sufficient for
you, that by his grace ye may be
perfect in Christ; and if by the
grace of God ye are perfect in
Christ, ye can in nowise deny the
power of God.
33 And again, if ye by the
grace of God are perfect in
Christ, and deny not his power,
then are ye sanctified in Christ
by the grace of God, through the
shedding of the blood of Christ,
which is in the covenant of the
Father unto the remission of your
sins, that ye become holy, without
spot.
34 And now I bid unto all,
farewell. I soon go to rest in the
paradise of God, until my spirit
and body shall again reunite, and
I am brought forth triumphant
through the air, to meet you
before the pleasing bar of the
great Jehovah, the Eternal Judge
of both quick and dead.
Amen. |
| QUESTION from:Roger Atkin, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 9/17/1999: | |
| I am a new Elders quarum teacher, I have never tought before and am scared to death. My first lesson is on building personal testimony, can you suggest anything to help me with this subject? thank you Roger | |
Building personal testimony is
something that Alma addressed in
the Book of Mormon. He likened our
faith and testimony unto a seed.
Here is his discourse:
Alma 32:17 Yea, there are many who
do say: If thou wilt show unto us
a sign from heaven, then we shall
know of a surety; then we shall
believe.
18 Now I ask, is this faith?
Behold, I say unto you, Nay; for
if a man knoweth a thing he hath
no cause to believe, for he
knoweth it.
19 And now, how much more
cursed is he that knoweth the will
of God and doeth it not, than he
that only believeth, or only hath
cause to believe, and falleth into
transgression?
20 Now of this thing ye must
judge. Behold, I say unto you,
that it is on the one hand even as
it is on the other; and it shall
be unto every man according to his
work.
21 And now as I said
concerning faith--faith is not to
have a perfect knowledge of
things; therefore if ye have faith
ye hope for things which are not
seen, which are true.
22 And now, behold, I say unto
you, and I would that ye should
remember, that God is merciful
unto all who believe on his name;
therefore he desireth, in the
first place, that ye should
believe, yea, even on his word.
23 And now, he imparteth his
word by angels unto men, yea, not
only men but women also. Now this
is not all; little children do
have words given unto them many
times, which confound the wise and
the learned.
24 And now, my beloved
brethren, as ye have desired to
know of me what ye shall do
because ye are afflicted and cast
out--now I do not desire that ye
should suppose that I mean to
judge you only according to that
which is true--
25 For I do not mean that ye
all of you have been compelled to
humble yourselves; for I verily
believe that there are some among
you who would humble themselves,
let them be in whatsoever
circumstances they might.
26 Now, as I said concerning
faith--that it was not a perfect
knowledge--even so it is with my
words. Ye cannot know of their
surety at first, unto perfection,
any more than faith is a perfect
knowledge.
27 But behold, if ye will
awake and arouse your faculties,
even to an experiment upon my
words, and exercise a particle of
faith, yea, even if ye can no more
than desire to believe, let this
desire work in you, even until ye
believe in a manner that ye can
give place for a portion of my
words.
28 Now, we will compare the
word unto a seed. Now, if ye give
place, that a seed may be planted
in your heart, behold, if it be a
true seed, or a good seed, if ye
do not cast it out by your
unbelief, that ye will resist the
Spirit of the Lord, behold, it
will begin to swell within your
breasts; and when you feel these
swelling motions, ye will begin to
say within yourselves--It must
needs be that this is a good seed,
or that the word is good, for it
beginneth to enlarge my soul; yea,
it beginneth to enlighten my
understanding, yea, it beginneth
to be delicious to me.
29 Now behold, would not this
increase your faith? I say unto
you, Yea; nevertheless it hath not
grown up to a perfect knowledge.
30 But behold, as the seed
swelleth, and sprouteth, and
beginneth to grow, then you must
needs say that the seed is good;
for behold it swelleth, and
sprouteth, and beginneth to grow.
And now, behold, will not this
strengthen your faith? Yea, it
will strengthen your faith: for ye
will say I know that this is a
good seed; for behold it sprouteth
and beginneth to grow.
31 And now, behold, are ye
sure that this is a good seed? I
say unto you, Yea; for every seed
bringeth forth unto its own
likeness.
32 Therefore, if a seed
groweth it is good, but if it
groweth not, behold it is not
good, therefore it is cast away.
33 And now, behold, because ye
have tried the experiment, and
planted the seed, and it swelleth
and sprouteth, and beginneth to
grow, ye must needs know that the
seed is good.
34 And now, behold, is your
knowledge perfect? Yea, your
knowledge is perfect in that
thing, and your faith is dormant;
and this because you know, for ye
know that the word hath swelled
your souls, and ye also know that
it hath sprouted up, that your
understanding doth begin to be
enlightened, and your mind doth
begin to expand.
35 O then, is not this real? I
say unto you, Yea, because it is
light; and whatsoever is light, is
good, because it is discernible,
therefore ye must know that it is
good; and now behold, after ye
have tasted this light is your
knowledge perfect?
36 Behold I say unto you, Nay;
neither must ye lay aside your
faith, for ye have only exercised
your faith to plant the seed that
ye might try the experiment to
know if the seed was good.
37 And behold, as the tree
beginneth to grow, ye will say:
Let us nourish it with great care,
that it may get root, that it may
grow up, and bring forth fruit
unto us. And now behold, if ye
nourish it with much care it will
get root, and grow up, and bring
forth fruit.
38 But if ye neglect the tree,
and take no thought for its
nourishment, behold it will not
get any root; and when the heat of
the sun cometh and scorcheth it,
because it hath no root it withers
away, and ye pluck it up and cast
it out.
39 Now, this is not because
the seed was not good, neither is
it because the fruit thereof would
not be desirable; but it is
because your ground is barren, and
ye will not nourish the tree,
therefore ye cannot have the fruit
thereof.
40 And thus, if ye will not
nourish the word, looking forward
with an eye of faith to the fruit
thereof, ye can never pluck of the
fruit of the tree of life.
41 But if ye will nourish the
word, yea, nourish the tree as it
beginneth to grow, by your faith
with great diligence, and with
patience, looking forward to the
fruit thereof, it shall take root;
and behold it shall be a tree
springing up unto everlasting life.
42 And because of your
diligence and your faith and your
patience with the word in
nourishing it, that it may take
root in you, behold, by and by ye
shall pluck the fruit thereof,
which is most precious, which is
sweet above all that is sweet, and
which is white above all that is
white, yea, and pure above all
that is pure; and ye shall feast
upon this fruit even until ye are
filled, that ye hunger not,
neither shall ye thirst.
43 Then, my brethren, ye shall
reap the rewards of your faith,
and your diligence, and patience,
and long-suffering, waiting for
the tree to bring forth fruit unto
you.
|
| QUESTION from:Alex R. Spong, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/17/1999: | |
| I recently attended a weekly LDS Seminar taught by the author (compliler) of the Encyclopedia Morminism. The seminar was entitled, "The Greatest Week in History" and was a recap of events leading up to the crucifiction and resurrection of the Savior. An interesting notion was raised regarding the timing of the resurrection. I had traditionally understood that Christ was placed on the cross Friday morning and died shortly thereafter. And that he was resurrected on Sunday morning. However, in the seminar it was suggested that perhaps Christ was put on the cross on Thursday and raised again on Sunday morning. This possibility seems to make more sense in light of numerous scriptural references that often cite a 3 day interval. E.G. The Savior responding to the pharisees/scribes that the only sign he would give them (regarding his resurrection) would be the sign of Jonas, ie being in the belly of the fish for 3 days. What are your thoughts on this? Do you think the Savior was placed on the cross on Thursday or Friday? It seems this is an important question as some faiths (7th Day Adventist, Judaism, etc) celebrate the Sabbath at a different time than many Christians ie on Sunday (or the 1st day of the week). | |
1 Nephi 19:10 ...The God of
Abraham, and of Isaac, and the God
of Jacob, yieldeth himself,
according to the words of the
angel, as a man, into the hands of
wicked men, to be lifted up,
according to the words of Zenock,
and to be crucified, according to
the words of Neum, and to be
buried in a sepulchre, according
to the words of Zenos, which he
spake concerning the three days of
darkness, which should be a sign
given of his death unto those who
should inhabit the isles of the
sea, more especially given unto
those who are of the house of
Israel.Mosiah 15:7 Yea, even so he shall be led, crucified, and slain, the flesh becoming subject even unto death, the will of the Son being swallowed up in the will of the Father. 8 And thus God breaketh the bands of death, having gained the victory over death; giving the Son power to make intercession for the children of men-- 9 Having ascended into heaven, having the bowels of mercy; being filled with compassion towards the children of men; standing betwixt them and justice; having broken the bands of death, taken upon himself their iniquity and their transgressions, having redeemed them, and satisfied the demands of justice. Now we have a clue in the New Testament to the time of his crucifixion, but not of his birth; that is, we know that he was crucified on Friday, for all of the Evangelists testify that Saturday was the Jewish Sabbath, and that on Friday Jesus was hung on the cross... Journal of Discourses, Vol.15, p.261, Orson Pratt, December 29, 1872 I have never heard before of the idea that Jesus was lifted up on the cross on a Thursday. We have the New Testament record concerning the timing of Christ's crucifixion, and the mention of the sabbath, which we understand was a Saturday, not a Friday. On the night of His crucifixion, the record states: Mark 15:42 And now when the even was come, because it was the preparation, that is, the day before the sabbath, The question is not whether Christ was placed on the cross on a Thursday or a Friday, but whether the Jewish Sabbath was a Friday or a Saturday. The scriptures seem to be clear: Christ was placed on the cross on the eve of the sabbath. |
| QUESTION from:Dave Mumford, Non-Denominational Christian, Age 50+, wrote on 9/18/1999: | |
| Hi, I make a living from religion, selling books, tapes etc. and giving talks. My wife says that I should give all the money I earn to the poor. But then I would have to work! What is your opinion? D | |
It depends on WHY one does the
things that they do. We should all
be careful of the warning of the
ancient American/Nephite prophet
Nephi who spoke of priestcrafts,
where men set themselves up as a
light to get gain. I'm not saying
you are doing this. He declared:2 Nephi 26:29 [The Lord] commandeth that there shall be no priestcrafts; for, behold, priestcrafts are that men preach and set themselves up for a light unto the world, that they may get gain and praise of the world; but they seek not the welfare of Zion. 30 Behold, the Lord hath forbidden this thing; wherefore, the Lord God hath given a commandment that all men should have charity, which charity is love. And except they should have charity they were nothing. Wherefore, if they should have charity they would not suffer the laborer in Zion to perish. 31 But the laborer in Zion shall labor for Zion; for if they labor for money they shall perish. What this means is that the "laborer" in Zion will be taken care of by his own. Zion will have charity and this is the way a laborer in Zion is to make ends meet. People will come forward with money and help, to meet their needs. If one gets rich on this, there is something wrong with the picture. The money is better spent on the poor, because it is sacred money. It was given out of charity. But to meet one's modest needs, that seems OK to me. Luke 10:7 And in the same house remain, eating and drinking such things as they give: for the labourer is worthy of his hire. Go not from house to house. Or in other words, don't beg or ask. Trust in the Lord! How often we hear people asking for money and help, like beggars. I can not imagine Paul or any other ancient Apostle doing this. They would trust in the Lord, and people would come forth out of charity. They would follow the promptings of the Spirit. A paid ministry is not a good thing. It leads to corruption as we have seen many times even in the last few years, as preachers who take personal shares of the sacred monies that come in from their congregations, and are many times caught in scandal. for if they labor for money they shall perish. Motives are everything. To be reimbursed is no sin, but let the saints do it out of charity. Trust that the Lord will take care of you. If we can't have that kind of trust or faith, then get a job. |
| QUESTION from:Ken Lacey, Born Again Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 9/18/1999: | |
| The Book of Mormon/church teaches that Jesus and Lucifer were once brothers up in heaven. When I read the KJV bible in Ephesians 6:12 and Colossians 1:16 it indicates that Jesus created the 'principalities' - one of those must have been Lucifer. How could Jesus be Lucifer's brother and his creator at the same time? | |
Jesus is the creator, that is
true, but there is a limit as to
what He created. Certainly He did
not create His Father in Heaven,
to whom He prayed. The New
Testament as well as the Book of
Mormon records many instances
where Jesus Christ prayed to His
Father in Heaven, His literal
Father. He was the Son of God, and
every son has a father.
3 Nephi 17:17 And no tongue can
speak, neither can there be
written by any man, neither can
the hearts of men conceive so
great and marvelous things as we
both saw and heard Jesus speak;
and no one can conceive of the joy
which filled our souls at the time
we heard him pray for us unto the
Father.
18 And it came to pass that
when Jesus had made an end of
praying unto the Father, he arose;
but so great was the joy of the
multitude that they were overcome.
19 And it came to pass that
Jesus spake unto them, and bade
them arise.
20 And they arose from the
earth, and he said unto them:
Blessed are ye because of your
faith. And now behold, my joy is
full.
21 And when he had said these
words, he wept, and the multitude
bare record of it, and he took
their little children, one by one,
and blessed them, and prayed unto
the Father for them.
22 And when he had done this
he wept again;
23 And he spake unto the
multitude, and said unto them:
Behold your little ones. Having established that there are at least two beings in the Godhead, and the third is the Holy Ghost, we know that the creator of this earth, Jesus Christ, is in parnership (if you will) with other perfect and eternal beings. That is how God works. God our Father has a very vast family, and Jesus Christ was His most beloved Son. Jesus Christ was selected among all His sons to be the Savior of the world. Lucifer was rejected, and a third of the hosts of heaven followed after Lucifer when there was a war in heaven. These were cast out of heaven. 1 Nephi 10:21 ...no unclean thing can dwell with God... Since no unclean thing can dwell in the presence of God, that is why these spirit brother and sisters of ours were cast out of heaven, because they became rebellious and unclean.
Revelation 12:7 And there was war
in heaven: Michael and his angels
fought against the dragon; and the
dragon fought and his angels,
8 And prevailed not; neither
was their place found any more in
heaven.
9 And the great dragon was
cast out, that old serpent, called
the Devil, and Satan, which
deceiveth the whole world: he was
cast out into the earth, and his
angels were cast out with him.
So we see that Satan was in heaven at one time, and at that time, he was OK enough to still be there. But he turned on God, just as Judas turned on the Savior, and he and a third part of the hosts of heaven lost their first estate and were damned forever. Since all of us who are here on earth kept our first estate in heaven, we have opportunity to move onward, and if we fully believe in Jesus Christ we can become exalted like He is now. Jesus said to John: Revelation 3:21 To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne. |
| QUESTION from:regina phillips, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/18/1999: | |
| who do you think the Nephilim (the sons of God who came down) were??? I am a latter day saint and this really interests me as to whom they may have been,and where did they come from? have any theories?? thanx | |
Genesis 6:2
...The sons of God saw the
daughters of men that they [were]
fair; and they took them wives of
all which they chose.
The Book of Moses, which also covers some of the same time period renders this more clear:
The Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible also renders this scripture as the sons of men. Even if we allow for the sons of God to be used in this scripture, there are other ways of looking at this. John taught:
John 1:12 But as many as received
him, to them gave he power to
become the sons of God, [even] to
them that believe on his name:
and Paul:
Romans 8:14 For as many as are led
by the Spirit of God, they are the
sons of God. There is no need to think the unthinkable, that extra- terrestrial beings (or angels of God for that matter) came down to help populate the earth. |
| QUESTION from:Bert Graef, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/18/1999: | |
| Which of Noah's sons do the Jaredites, Lamanites, and nephites come from. why are there no genealogies in the book of mormon to coincide with the genealogies in the old testament? | |
Probably Shem, but here is what
Moroni said when translating and
including the 24 gold plates
containing the record of the
Jaredite nation:
Ether 1:3 And as I suppose that
the first part of this record,
which speaks concerning the
creation of the world, and also of
Adam, and an account from that
time even to the great tower, and
whatsoever things transpired among
the children of men until that
time, is had among the Jews--
4 Therefore I do not write those
things which transpired from the
days of Adam until that time; but
they are had upon the plates; and
whoso findeth them, the same will
have power that he may get the
full account. The Nephite and Lamanite genealogy we know, because we have the record of Alma stating that they came from Manasseh (alma 10:3) and that Ishmael and his family came from Ephraim, and Mulek from King Zedekiah. |
| QUESTION from:Chelsea Jo Rivera, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 1-17, wrote on 9/19/1999: | |
| Where did Heavenly Father come from? | |
He is eternal, and has always
existed, just as you and I have
always existed. There never was a time
when there were not spirits; for
they are co-equal [co-eternal]
with our Father in heaven.(see
TPJS Section Six 1843-44, p.353).
We are all eternal intelligences, but now we have our opportunity for growth and advancement in God's Plan of Salvation for us, even the Plan of our Heavenly Father. It is now our turn to come to an earth, gain a body of flesh and bone, receive a resurrection, and go on to one of the three Kingdoms of Glory, possibly the Celestial Kingdom of God where Heavenly Father dwells...depending on our faith and obedience to His Son and His commandments. The prophet Mormon taught:
Mormon 7:5 Know ye that ye must
come to the knowledge of your
fathers, and repent of all your
sins and iniquities, and believe
in Jesus Christ, that he is the
Son of God, and that he was slain
by the Jews, and by the power of
the Father he hath risen again,
whereby he hath gained the victory
over the grave; and also in him is
the sting of death swallowed up.
6 And he bringeth to pass the
resurrection of the dead, whereby
man must be raised to stand before
his judgment-seat.
7 And he hath brought to pass
the redemption of the world,
whereby he that is found guiltless
before him at the judgment day
hath it given unto him to dwell in
the presence of God in his
kingdom, to sing ceaseless praises
with the choirs above, unto the
Father, and unto the Son, and unto
the Holy Ghost, which are one God,
in a state of happiness which hath
no end.
8 Therefore repent, and be
baptized in the name of Jesus, and
lay hold upon the gospel of
Christ, which shall be set before
you, not only in this record but
also in the record which shall
come unto the Gentiles from the
Jews, which record shall come from
the Gentiles unto you.
|
| QUESTION from:Ronald Joseph Smith, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 9/19/1999: | |
| Dear BOMA, I had asked this question about ten months ago, but didn't get an answer. Anyway, here goes: I was teaching a seminary class, last fall, and we came to D&C 63:16, which reads, "and verily I say unto you, as I have said before, he that looketh on a woman to lust after her...shall commit adultery in their hearts." One of the boys said that this adulterous disposition could only be made by MARRIED men. I disagreed, saying that lustful thoughts grieve the Spirit of all men, married or single. It is the desires of one's heart that is at the root of adulterous behaviour. Are there any scripture references that might make this a bit clearer? Can adultery only be committed by married men? | |
The burden is upon him to prove
that this commandment is for
married men only. Jesus said to
the Nephites:
3 Nephi 12:28 But I say unto you,
that whosoever looketh on a woman,
to lust after her, hath committed
adultery already in his heart.
29 Behold, I give unto you a
commandment, that ye suffer none
of these things to enter into your
heart;
30 For it is better that ye
should deny yourselves of these
things, wherein ye will take up
your cross, than that ye should be
cast into hell.
Jesus taught that "whosoever" looks upon a woman in lust, commits this adultery in his heart. "Whosoever" can include a young unmarried man as well. Jesus did not qualify this statement for married men only. The sin of adultery/fornication is capable of being committed by all. The late prophet Harold B. Lee (and many others!) wrote: "Thou shalt not commit adultery" (which is unquestionably interpreted to mean all unlawful sexual association, inasmuch as the Master used interchangeably the words adultery and fornication in defining sexual impurity, and it has been severely condemned in every dispensation by authorized church leaders). |
| QUESTION from:Michael Ferraro, Other Religion, Age 25-34, wrote on 9/19/1999: | |
| Why are Greek words so prevalent throughtout the Book of Mormon? (ie., christ, crucify, baptism, church, Timothy, etc.) Was the Greek culture a major influence on the family of Lehi while living in Jerusalem? If not, why are Alpha & Omega (2 greek letters) used by Jesus when speaking to peoples on this continent, since they were totally seperated from the Old World? [see 3 Nephi 9:18 (34AD)] Thank you for your consideration. | |
No, the Greek culture was a major
influence on America, as these
words were common and prevalent
already in the United States,
where the Bible was had. Joseph
Smith was very familiar with the
Holy Writ as well and was a
student of the word before the age
of 14.Upon translation of the Book of Mormon into the known language of the day, words were used that were familiar to Joseph Smith, for he was the one through whom the Lord worked. All we have to do is read the scriptures such as the New Testament to see how differently language styles come through depending on who wrote the books. To me, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John wrote about the same events, yet used different words in many cases to describe the events. These books are also (in my opinion) significantly easier to read than the writings of the great Apostle Paul, who was multi- cultural being a Jew, a Roman citizen by birth, and familiar with Greek as well. As he speaks to different peoples in his apostolic missionary work efforts, it can be difficult to follow his line of reasoning if one does not consider to WHOM he is speaking, and considering WHAT he is emphasizing. He was dealing with the closure of the law of Moses (a major change for the people) with many individuals who were either considering the new doctrines of Christ, or were holding on to the older law. Thus the emphasis on grace and the deadness of the law (which many today interpret as license not to worry about keeping the commandments, the ordinances of baptism, etc.) In Paul's theology, the doctrines of salvation by grace and justification by faith do not eliminate but require the absolute necessity for high personal standards of conduct (see 1 Cor. 6:9-11; Gal. 5:19-21). So what is my point? These prophets wrote what they felt, and what they were inspired to write. They covered the same topics with different words: their words, their style. Joseph Smith translated the Book of Mormon into the language of his mind. He knew the little bit of Greek influence that was in the Americas at the time. |
| QUESTION from:anonymous, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 9/21/1999: | |
| Something has been bothering me: I hear said that we need to try transgression or sin in order to understand it and to gain experience and know what we're trying to overcome. Well, I don't like that idea and would like some help with the argument for the other side. Can you help me strengthen my perspective? Thank you much | |
That is a false thing you have
heard. Jesus never tried sin, yet
He understood all things. Alma
knew this and taught:
Alma 7:11 And he shall go forth,
suffering pains and afflictions
and temptations of every kind; and
this that the word might be
fulfilled which saith he will take
upon him the pains and the
sicknesses of his people.
12 And he will take upon him
death, that he may loose the bands
of death which bind his people;
and he will take upon him their
infirmities, that his bowels may
be filled with mercy, according to
the flesh, that he may know
according to the flesh how to
succor his people according to
their infirmities.
Alma reveals that the Savior suffered affliction and pain, and was not absolved from temptations of any kind, so that he might fully understand his people. There is a popular myth which teaches that good people know little if anything about the power of temptation. This is patently false. It is the wicked who know little of its allure, its seducing force, and its punishing power because they never resist. How do they know what it is like to have to be strong for an hour, a day, or a year. The Savior never gave in. He stands alone as the one who never fell captive to the enticements of sin for an entire lifetime. He knows more about the power of temptation than any. For this reason, he can "succor his people according to their infirmities. (source: JBMS p.88) |
| QUESTION from:Steven A. Pocock, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 35-49, wrote on 9/22/1999: | |
| A friend of mine told me that the Prophet while traveling through Huntsville, Missouri, during Zion's camp said that this was the original location of the city of Manti. The Manti named in the Book of Mormon. He said this was confirmed in two seperate journals and re- confirmed in another book, which I cannot remember. Can you confirm this? Or debunk it? I would appreciate your help. Thanks, Steven A. Pocock | |
It is!Here are the exerpts from Church History journals:
"The camp passed through
Huntsville, in Randolph County,
which has been appointed as one of
the stakes of Zion, and is the
ancient site of the City of Manti,
and pitched tents at Dark Creek,
Salt Licks, seventeen miles. It
was reported to the camp that one
hundred and ten men had
volunteered from Randolph and gone
to Far West to settle
difficulties." (taken from the
history of the travels of the
Kirtland Camp)
"September 25, 1838. We passed
through Huntsville, Co, seat of
Randolph Co, Pop. 450, and three
miles further we bought 32 bu, of
corn off one of the brethren who
resides in this place. There are
several of the brethren round
about here and this is the ancient
site of the City of Manti, which
is spoken of in the Book of Mormon
and this is appointed one of the
Stakes of Zion, and it is in
Randolph County, Missouri, three
miles west of the county seat."
(taken from the daily journal of
the Kirtland Camp, and was written
by Samuel D. Tyler) |
| QUESTION from:dave, Other Religion, Age 18-24, wrote on 10/2/1999: | |
| Dear Answerman, I have a number of mormon friends who have tried to enlighten me over the years of their beliefs, all of them have been members from a very young age as I believe you also have. My friends tell me of a feeling they get inside(the Holy Ghost I believe) where they know with no uncertainty that their church is the true and only church of God. My question is this, how can a person who has been a member of one church their whole life have had an opportunity to explore the many other religions in this world, is it not possible that the feeling a Protestant, for example, gets in their heart is even a greater one than what a mormon might feel? I'm certain that Hindus, Muslims, Jews, Buhdists, Catholics, etc. all experiance feelings inside that tell their heart that what they believe is true. So in conclusion isn't it ignorant to say that with no uncertainty at all the mormon church is the one and only true church of God, when most members have probably not even explored any other options at all? I ask only because I'm In search of the truth and it frustrates me to see my friends so content with ignoring all other religions and spiritual traditions in the world. They seem to me to be hypocrites. Thank you. | |
Everyone who is born into the
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-
day Saints must come to a turning
point where they gain a testimony
of various truths. But since
faith is like a seed which grows
into a tree, it is a process that
evolves (see Alma 32)So how do we know if what we have is more or less than what others have? Well, we can't speak for others, only ourselves. If the "fruit" of the tree of our faith is delicious, and we know it is because we like the way it tastes, then why would one abandon such a tree bearing fruit? Would one chop down a perfect fruit tree, and go searching for another tree?
Alma 32:37 And behold, as the tree
beginneth to grow, ye will say:
Let us nourish it with great care,
that it may get root, that it may
grow up, and bring forth fruit
unto us. And now behold, if ye
nourish it with much care it will
get root, and grow up, and bring
forth fruit.
38 But if ye neglect the tree,
and take no thought for its
nourishment, behold it will not
get any root; and when the heat of
the sun cometh and scorcheth it,
because it hath no root it withers
away, and ye pluck it up and cast
it out.
39 Now, this is not because
the seed was not good, neither is
it because the fruit thereof would
not be desirable; but it is
because your ground is barren, and
ye will not nourish the tree,
therefore ye cannot have the fruit
thereof.
40 And thus, if ye will not
nourish the word, looking forward
with an eye of faith to the fruit
thereof, ye can never pluck of the
fruit of the tree of life.
41 But if ye will nourish the
word, yea, nourish the tree as it
beginneth to grow, by your faith
with great diligence, and with
patience, looking forward to the
fruit thereof, it shall take root;
and behold it shall be a tree
springing up unto everlasting life.
42 And because of your
diligence and your faith and your
patience with the word in
nourishing it, that it may take
root in you, behold, by and by ye
shall pluck the fruit thereof,
which is most precious, which is
sweet above all that is sweet, and
which is white above all that is
white, yea, and pure above all
that is pure; and ye shall feast
upon this fruit even until ye are
filled, that ye hunger not,
neither shall ye thirst.
43 Then, my brethren, ye shall
reap the rewards of your faith,
and your diligence, and patience,
and long-suffering, waiting for
the tree to bring forth fruit unto
you.
Now as to our ability to judge what other faiths have to offer, it is a simple matter of considering the doctrines, praying about them, seeing if they are compatible with that which we have already come to know is true by the power of the Spirit and personal prayer...etc. If we have tasted of fruit, and it is sweet and wonderful, there is no need to reject that which we know. It is a benchmark by which other things can be judged. I have examined, for instance, the doctrines of other faiths, and so many of the world religions deny the divine nature of Jesus Christ, and I can reject that false doctrine without delay, because the Holy Ghost has made such a strong witness to my soul that He lives, that He is my Savior, my God, my King. I have a benchmark by which to judge. I have a witness. |
| QUESTION from:Heather Loyalll, Latter-day Saint Christian, Age 18-24, wrote on 10/2/1999: | |
| Recently I was speaking to a co- worker about religion, and he stated that he could not believe anything in the Book of Mormon because it is not supported by the Bible. I remember when my family was converted we were shone a verse in the Bible that said there would be other books, or Jesus would visit other lands. I can't remember the exact spot please tell me were it is so I can show it to my co-worker. Thank you. | |
Jesus taught His disciples:And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one shepherd. (John 10:16.) The prophet E |